Advertisement

Seismic behavior of thin-walled circular and stiffened square steel tubed-reinforced-concrete columns

  • Dan GanEmail author
  • XuHong Zhou
  • JiePeng Liu
  • Jiang Li
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Steel tubed-reinforced-concrete (TRC) columns have been gradually used in the construction of high-rise buildings recently because of their high axial load-carrying capacities and excellent seismic behavior. Existing studies about their seismic behavior were focused on columns with relatively thick tubes, i.e., diameter-to-thickness/width-to-thickness (D/t) ratios were below 100, while little is known about thin-walled TRC columns, especially for square TRC columns. Considering the infilled concrete of square TRC columns is non-uniformly and non-effectively confined, accordingly, stiffened square TRC columns are usually adopted in practice. Thus, two thin-walled circular TRC columns (D/t=120) and two stiffened square ones with diagonal stiffeners in plastic hinge regions (D/t=106) were tested under a constant axial compression combined with cyclic lateral loading. Both the circular and stiffened square TRC columns had the same cross sectional area, tube thickness, reinforcing bar ratio and column height. Flexural failure occurred for all the four specimens. Test results showed the strengths of the stiffened square TRC columns were a little higher in comparison to their circular counterparts; the ductility and energy dissipation capacities were excellent for both the stiffened and circular TRC columns, indicating very good confinement was gained from the yielded steel tubes of the plastic hinge regions at the peak loads. And shear stresses (35–90 MPa) in the sheared plates showed their moderate contribution of carrying lateral loads. Finally, cross sectional capacity analysis results demonstrated the method for TRC columns is acceptable for the stiffened square TRC columns.

Keywords

steel tubed-reinforced-concrete column concrete filled steel tube composite column cyclic behavior steel jacket 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fukuhara T, Sun Y P. Earthquake-resisting properties of confined high-strength concrete frames. In: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, 2008. 1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gan D, Zhou Z, Yan F, et al. Shear transfer capacity of composite sections in steel tubed-reinforced-concrete frames. Structures, 2017, 12: 54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Priestley M J N, Seible F, Xiao Y, et al. Steel jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns for enhanced shear strength-Part 2: Test results and comparison with theory. ACI Struct J, 1994, 91: 537–551Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Q J, Cai J, Bradford M A, et al. Seismic behaviour of a throughbeam connection between concrete-filled steel tubular columns and reinforced concrete beams. Eng Struct, 2014, 80: 24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou X, Cheng G, Liu J, et al. Behavior of circular tubed-RC column to RC beam connections under axial compression. J Constr Steel Res, 2017, 130: 96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hiroyuki Y, Hiroshi H, Kishimoto H, Hideyuki K. Construction of a large-scale super high-rise apartment building with ultra-high strength concrete column confined by steel plate (Fc=130 N/mm2) (in Japanese). Concrete Eng, 2006, 44: 51–57Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han L H, Yao G H, Chen Z B, et al. Experimental behaviours of steel tube confined concrete (STCC) columns. Steel Compos Struct, 2005, 5: 459–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou X, Liu J. Seismic behavior and shear strength of tubed RC short columns. J Constr Steel Res, 2010, 66: 385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aboutaha R S, Machado R I. Seismic resistance of steel-tubed highstrength reinforced-concrete columns. J Struct Eng, 1999, 125: 485–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun Y, Sakino K, Yasuda K, et al. Earthquake-resisting performance of R/C columns confined by square steel tubes: Part 3. Effects of shear span ratio of column (in Japanese). Trans AIJ, 2001, 66: 129–136Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiao Y, Wu H. Retrofit of reinforced concrete columns using partially stiffened steel jackets. J Struct Eng, 2003, 129: 725–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu J, Ali Abdullah J, Zhang S. Hysteretic behavior and design of square tubed reinforced and steel reinforced concrete (STRC and/or STSRC) short columns. Thin-Walled Struct, 2011, 49: 874–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ding F, Lu D, Bai Y, et al. Comparative study of square stirrupconfined concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns under axial loading. Thin-Walled Struct, 2016, 98: 443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Y T, Cai J, Long Y L. Hysteretic behavior of square CFT columns with binding bars. J Constr Steel Res, 2017, 131: 162–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding F, Luo L, Wang L, et al. Pseudo-static tests of terminal stirrupconfined concrete-filled rectangular steel tubular columns. J Constr Steel Res, 2018, 144: 135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park R. State of the art report ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In: 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, 1988. 605–616Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    CEN. EuroCode 8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN 1998-1: 2004. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    China Construction Science Research Institute. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (in Chinese). GB50011-2010. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2010Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang S, Guo L, Ye Z, et al. Behavior of steel tube and confined high strength concrete for concrete-filled RHS tubes. Adv Struct Eng, 2005, 8: 101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu J, Gan D, Zhou X, et al. Cyclic shear behavior and shear strength of steel tubed-reinforced-concrete short columns. Adv Struct Eng, 2018, 21: 1749–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gan D, Guo L, Liu J, et al. Seismic behavior and moment strength of tubed steel reinforced-concrete (SRC) beam-columns. J Constr Steel Res, 2011, 67: 1516–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang X, Liu J, Zhang S. Behavior of short circular tubed-reinforcedconcrete columns subjected to eccentric compression. Eng Struct, 2015, 105: 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu J, Wang X, Zhang S. Behavior of square tubed reinforced-concrete short columns subjected to eccentric compression. Thin-Walled Struct, 2015, 91: 108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Gan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • XuHong Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  • JiePeng Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area (Ministry of Education)Chongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations