Advertisement

An application of the LTP_DSEF model to heavy precipitation forecasts of landfalling tropical cyclones over China in 2018

  • Zuo Jia
  • Fumin RenEmail author
  • Dalin Zhang
  • Chenchen Ding
  • Mingjen Yang
  • Tian Feng
  • Boyu Chen
  • Hui Yang
Research Paper Special Topic: Weather characteristics and climate anomalies of the TC track, heavy rainfall and tornadoes in 2018
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Recently, a track-similarity-based Dynamical-Statistical Ensemble Forecast (LTP_DSEF) model has been developed in an attempt to predict heavy rainfall from Landfalling Tropical cyclones (LTCs). In this study, the LTP_DSEF model is applied to predicting heavy precipitation associated with 10 LTCs occurring over China in 2018. The best forecast scheme of the model with optimized parameters is obtained after testing 3452 different schemes for the 10 LTCs. Then, its performance is compared to that of three operational dynamical models. Results show that the LTP_DSEF model has advantages over the three dynamical models in predicting heavy precipitation accumulated after landfall, especially for rainfall amounts greater than 250 mm. The model also provides superior or slightly inferior heavy rainfall forecast performance for individual LTCs compared to the three dynamical models. In particular, the LTP_DSEF model can predict heavy rainfall with valuable threat scores associated with certain LTCs, which is not possible with the three dynamical models. Moreover, the model can reasonably capture the distribution of heavier accumulated rainfall, albeit with widespread coverage compared to observations. The preliminary results suggest that the LTP_DSEF model can provide useful forecast guidance for heavy accumulated rainfall of LTCs despite its limited variables included in the model.

Keywords

Landfalling tropical cyclones Heavy precipitation forecasts LTP_DSEF model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41675042), the Hainan Provincial Key R & D Program of China (Grant No. SQ2019KJHZ0028), the National Key R & D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1507703), and the Project “Dynamical-Statistical Ensemble Technique for Predicting Landfalling Tropical Cyclones Precipitation”.

References

  1. Cangialosi J, Franklin J. 2015. National Hurricane Center Forecast Verification Report. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/National Hurricane Center. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2015.pdf
  2. Chen L S, Xu Y L. 2017. Review of typhoon very intense rainfall in China (in Chinese). Meteorol Environ Sci, 40: 3–10Google Scholar
  3. Chou J F. 1974. A problem of using past data in numerical Weather Forecasts. Sci China Ser A, 17: 108–119Google Scholar
  4. Chou J F. 1986. Why do the dynamical models and statistical methods need to be combined?—Also on how to combine (in Chinese). Plateau Meteorol, 5: 77–82Google Scholar
  5. Ding C C, Ren F M, Qiu W Y, Li G P, Wu L G, Jiang X L. 2019. A Dynamical statistical ensemble forecast model for landfalling tropical cyclone precipitation based on track similarity (in Chinese). Meteorol Mon, 45: 29–37Google Scholar
  6. Ebert E E, Turk M, Kusselson S J, Yang J, Seybold M, Keehn P R, Kuligowski R J. 2011. Ensemble tropical rainfall potential (eTRaP) forecasts. Weather Forecast, 26: 213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao S T, Ran L K, Li N, Zhang X. 2013. The “ensemble dynamic factors” approach to predict rainstorm (in Chinese). Torrential Rain Disaster, 32: 289–302Google Scholar
  8. Hong J S, Fong C T, Hsiao L F, Yu Y C, Tzeng C Y. 2015. Ensemble typhoon quantitative precipitation forecasts model in Taiwan. Weather Forecast, 30: 217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsiao L F, Yang M J, Lee C S, Kuo H C, Shih D S, Tsai C C, Wang C J, Chang L Y, Chen D Y C, Feng L, Hong J S, Fong C T, Chen D S, Yeh T C, Huang C Y, Guo W D, Lin G F. 2013. Ensemble forecasting of typhoon rainfall and floods over a mountainous watershed in Taiwan. J Hydrol, 506: 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang Y, Jin L, Zhao H S, Huang X Y. 2018. Fuzzy neural network and LLE Algorithm for forecasting precipitation in tropical cyclones: Comparisons with interpolation method by ECMWF and stepwise regression method. Nat Hazards, 91: 201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang H Y, Zipser E J. 2010. Contribution of tropical cyclones to the global precipitation from eight seasons of TRMM data: Regional, seasonal, and interannual variations. J Clim, 23: 1526–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kidder S Q, Kusselson S J, Knaff J A, Ferraro R R, Kuligowski R J, Turk M. 2005. The tropical rainfall potential (TRaP) technique. Part I: Description and examples. Weather Forecast, 20: 456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koo C C. 1958. On the utilization of past data in numerical weather forecasting (in Chinese). Acta Meteorol Sin, 29: 176–184Google Scholar
  14. Langmack H, Fraedrich K, Sielmann F. 2012. Tropical cyclone track analog ensemble forecasting in the extended Australian basin: NWP combinations. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 138: 1828–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee C S, Huang L R, Shen H S, Wang S T. 2006. A climatology model for forecasting typhoon rainfall in Taiwan. Nat Hazards, 37: 87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li B, Zhao S X. 2009. Development of forecasting model of typhoon type rainstorm by using SMAT (in Chinese). Meteorology, 35: 3–12Google Scholar
  17. Li Q L, Lan H P, Chen Z L, Cao C Y, Li C, Wang X B. 2015. An operational statistical scheme for tropical cyclone induced rainfall forecast. J Trop Meteorol, 21: 101–110Google Scholar
  18. Liu C C. 2009. The influence of terrain on the tropical rainfall potential technique in Taiwan. Weather Forecast, 24: 785–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Y, Zhang D L, Yau M K. 1997. A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: Explicit simulation and verification. Mon Weather Rev, 125: 3073–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lonfat M, Rogers R, Marchok T, Marks Jr F D. 2007. A parametric model for predicting hurricane rainfall. Mon Weather Rev, 135: 3086–3097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchok T, Rogers R, Tuleya R. 2007. Validation schemes for tropical cyclone quantitative precipitation forecasts: Evaluation of operational models for U.S. landfalling cases. Weather Forecast, 22: 726–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marks F D, Kappler G, DeMaria M. 2002. Development of a tropical cyclone rainfall climatology and persistence (RCLIPER) model. San Diego: Preprints, 25th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology. 327–328Google Scholar
  23. Peng X D, Fei J F, Huang X G, Cheng X P. 2017. Evaluation and error analysis of official forecasts of tropical cyclones during 2005–14 over the Western North Pacific. Part I: Storm Tracks. Weather Forecast, 32: 689–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rappaport E N, Franklin J L, Avila L A, Baig S R, Beven Ii J L, Blake E S, Burr C A, Jiing J G, Juckins C A, Knabb R D, Landsea C W, Mainelli M, Mayfield M, McAdie C J, Pasch R J, Sisko C, Stewart S R, Tribble A N. 2009. Advances and challenges at the national hurricane center. Weather Forecast, 24: 395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ren F M, Gleason B, Easterling D R. 2001. A technique for partitioning tropical cyclone precipitation (in Chinese). J Trop Meteorol, 17: 308–313Google Scholar
  26. Ren F M, Qiu W Y, Jiang X L, Wu L G, Xu Y L, Duan Y H. 2018. An objective track similarity index and its preliminary application to predicting precipitation of landfalling tropical cyclones. Weather Forecast, 33: 1725–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ren F M, Wang Y M, Wang X L, Li W J. 2007. Estimating tropical cyclone precipitation from station observations. Adv Atmos Sci, 24: 700–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ren F M, Xiang C Y. 2017. Review and prospect of researches on the prediction of precipitation associated with landfalling tropical cyclones (in Chinese). J Mar Meteorol, 37: 8–18Google Scholar
  29. Tuleya R E, Bender M, Knutson T R, Sirutis J J, Thomas B, Ginis I. 2016. Impact of upper-tropospheric temperature anomalies and vertical wind shear on tropical cyclone evolution using an idealized version of the operational GFDL hurricane model. J Atmos Sci, 73: 3803–3820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuleya R E, Demaria M, Kuligowski R J. 2007. Evaluation of GFDL and simple statistical model rainfall forecasts for U.S. landfalling tropical storms. Weather Forecast, 22: 56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Shen X S, Chen D H. 2012. Verification of tropical cyclone rainfall predictions from CMA and JMA global models. J Trop Meteorol, 18: 537–542Google Scholar
  32. Wei C C. 2012. RBF neural networks combined with principal component analysis applied to quantitative precipitation forecast for a reservoir watershed during typhoon periods. J Hydrometeor, 13: 722–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiao Q N, Kou Y H, Sun J Z, Lee W C, Barker D, Lim E. 2007. An approach of Radar reflectivity data assimilation and its assessment with the inland QPF of typhoon Rusa (2002) at landfall. J Appl Meteor Climatol, 46: 14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang D L, Kain J S, Fritsch J M, Gao K. 1994. Comments on: “Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review”. Mon Weather Rev, 122: 2222–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang F Q, Weng Y H, Whitaker J S, Xie B G. 2010. Predicting typhoon Morakot’s catastrophic rainfall with a convection-permitting mesoscale ensemble system. Weather Forecast, 25: 1816–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang H L, Pu Z X. 2014. Influence of assimilating surface observations on numerical prediction of landfalls of hurricane Katrina (2005) with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev, 142: 2915–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao K, Li X F, Xue M, Jou B J, Lee W C. 2012. Short-term forecasting through intermittent assimilation of data from Taiwan and mainland China coastal radars for Typhoon Meranti (2010) at landfall. J Geophys Res, 117: D06108Google Scholar
  38. Zhong Y, Yu H, Teng W P, Chen P Y. 2009. A dynamic similitude scheme for tropical cyclone quantitative precipitation forecast (in Chinese). J Appl Meteorol Sci, 20: 17–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zuo Jia
    • 1
  • Fumin Ren
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dalin Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chenchen Ding
    • 1
  • Mingjen Yang
    • 3
  • Tian Feng
    • 1
    • 4
  • Boyu Chen
    • 5
  • Hui Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Severe WeatherChinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic ScienceUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Atmospheric Sciences“National” Taiwan UniversityTaipeiChina
  4. 4.College of Atmospheric SciencesChengdu University of Information TechnologyChengduChina
  5. 5.National Meteorological CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations