Science China Earth Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 11, pp 1756–1763 | Cite as

Rock crevices determine woody and herbaceous plant cover in the karst critical zone

  • Hongyan LiuEmail author
  • Zihan Jiang
  • Jingxi Dai
  • Xiuchen Wu
  • Jian Peng
  • Hongya Wang
  • Jeroen Meersmans
  • Sophie M. Green
  • Timothy A. Quine
Research Paper


The study of the critical zones (CZs) of the Earth link the composition and function of aboveground vegetation with the characteristics of the rock layers, providing a new way to study how the unique rock and soil conditions in karst regions affect the aboveground vegetation. Based on survey results of the rocks, soils and vegetation in the dolomite and limestone distribution areas in the karst area of central Guizhou, it was found that woody plant cover increases linearly with the number of cracks with a width of more than 1 mm, while the cover of herbaceous plants shows the opposite trend (p<0.01). The dolomite distribution area is characterized by undeveloped crevices, and the thickness of the soil layer is generally less than 20 cm, which is suitable for the distribution of herbaceous plants with shallow roots. Due to the development of crevices in the limestone distribution area, the soil is deeply distributed through the crevices for the deep roots of trees, which leads to a diversified species composition and a complicated structure in the aboveground vegetation. Based on moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) remote sensing data from 2001 to 2010, the normalized differentiated vegetation index (NDVI) and annual net primary productivity (NPP) results for each phase of a 16-day interval further indicate that the NDVI of the limestone distribution area is significantly higher than that in the dolomite distribution area, but the average annual NPP is the opposite. The results of this paper indicate that in karst CZs, the lithology determines the structure and distribution of the soil, which further determines the cover of woody and herbaceous plants in the aboveground vegetation. Although the amount of soil in the limestone area may be less than that in the dolomite area, the developed crevice structure is more suitable for the growth of trees with deep roots, and the vegetation activity is strong. At present, the treatment of rocky desertification in karst regions needs to fully consider the rock-soilvegetation- air interactions in karst CZs and propose vegetation restoration measures suitable for different lithologies.


Vegetation composition Vegetation productivity Dolomite Limestone Karst critical zone 



We thank the Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing assistance with the field survey. This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41571130044 & 41325002), 111 Plan (B14001), and Peking University Undergraduate Talents Training Program.


  1. Bornyasz M A, Graham R C, Allen M F. 2005. Ectomycorrhizae in a soil-weathered granitic bedrock regolith: Linking matrix resources to plants. Geoderma, 126: 141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brantley S L, Goldhaber M B, Ragnarsdottir K V. 2007. Crossing disciplines and scales to understand the critical zone. Elements, 3: 307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucker P K, Grapes R. 2011. Metamorphism of Dolomites and Limestones. Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B, Mooney H A, Sala O E, Schulze E D. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108: 583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compilation Committee of the Local Chronicle of Puding County. 1999. Puding County. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  6. Du H, Peng W X, Song T Q, Zeng F P, Wang K L, Song M, Zhang H. 2015. Spatial pattern of woody plants and their environmental interpretation in the karst forest of southwest China. Plant Biosystems, 149: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du X L, Wang S J, Luo X. 2009. Effects of different soil types on δ13C values of common plant leaves in karst rocky desertification areas in Guizhou Province (in Chinese with English abstract). Environ Sci, 35: 3587–3594Google Scholar
  8. Guo L, Lin H. 2016. Critical zone research and observatories: Current status and future perspectives. Vadose Zone J, 15: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hahm W J, Riebe C S, Lukens C E, Araki S. 2014. Bedrock composition regulates mountain ecosystems and landscape evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111: 3338–3343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang W L, Tu Y L, Yang L. 1988. Guizhou Vegetation (in Chinese). Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  11. Holbrook W S, Riebe C S, Elwaseif M, Hayes J L, Basler-Reeder K, Harry D L, Malazian A, Dosseto A, Hartsough P C, Hopmans J W. 2014. Geophysical constraints on deep weathering and water storage potential in the Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory. Earth Surf Process Landf, 39: 366–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang Z C, Lian Y Q, Qin X Q. 2014. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration. Earth-Sci Rev, 132: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuzyakov Y, Xu X L. 2013. Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: Mechanisms and ecological relevance. New Phytol, 198: 656–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin H. 2010. Earth’s Critical Zone and hydropedology: Concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 14: 25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Y G, Liu C C, Wei Y F, Liu Y G, Guo K. 2011. Species composition and community structure characteristics of different vegetation successional stages in Puding County, Guizhou Province (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Plant Ecol, 35: 1009–1018Google Scholar
  16. Loreau M, Hector A. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 412: 72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma L F. 2002. China Geological Atlas (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing HousesGoogle Scholar
  18. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Basic Research Opportunities in Earth Science. Washington D C: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Rempe D M, Dietrich W E. 2014. A bottom-up control on fresh-bedrock topography under landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111: 6576–6581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rempe D M, Dietrich W E. 2018. Direct observations of rock moisture, a hidden component of the hydrologic cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115: 2664–2669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richter D B, Yaalon D H. 2012. “The changing model of soil” revisited. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 76: 766–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richter D B, Billings S A. 2015. ‘One physical system’: Tansley’s ecosystem as Earth’s critical zone. New Phytol, 206: 900–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roering J J, Marshall J, Booth A M, Mort M, Jin Q. 2010. Evidence for biotic controls on topography and soil production. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 298: 183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schultz J, Jordan I, Jordan D. 1995. The Ecozones of the World: The Ecological Divisions of the Geosphere. Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  25. Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2005. Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma, 126: 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song T Q, Peng X X, Zeng Y P, Wang K L, Qin W G, Tan W N, Liu L, Du H, Lu S Y. 2010. The spatial pattern and environmental interpretation of forest communities in the karst peak clusters (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin J Plant Ecol, 34: 298–308Google Scholar
  27. Sweeting M M. 2012. Karst in China: Its Geomorphology and Environment. Berlin, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  28. Tong X, Brandt M, Yue Y, Horion S, Wang K, Keersmaecker W D, Tian F, Schurgers G, Xiao X, Luo Y, Chen C, Myneni R, Shi Z, Chen H, Fensholt R. 2018. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering. Nat Sustain, 1: 44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang C, Liu C Q, Song Z L, Liu Z M, Zheng H Y. 2008. Distribution characteristics of plant soil C, N and S in karst mountain areas of Guizhou (in Chinese with English abstract). J Beijing For Univ, 30: 45–51Google Scholar
  30. Yin L, Cui M, Zhou J X, Li Z W, Huang B, Fang J M. 2013. Spatial variability of soil thickness in small watersheds in karst plateau (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin Soil Water Conserv Sci, 11: 51–58Google Scholar
  31. Yu L F, Zhu S Q, Ye J Z. 2002. Drought tolerance adaptability of different species in karst forests (in Chinese with English abstract). J Nanjing For Univ-Nat Sci Ed, 26: 19–22Google Scholar
  32. Yue Y M, Zhang B, Wang K L, Liu B, Li R, Yang Q Q, Zhang M Y. 2010a. Spectral indices for estimating ecological indicators of karst rocky desertification. Int J Remote Sens, 31: 2115–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yue Y M, Wang K L, Zhang B, Chen Z X, Jiao Q J, Liu B, Chen H S. 2010b. Exploring the relationship between vegetation spectra and ecogeo-environmental conditions in karst region, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess, 160: 157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu S Q. 1997. Karst Forest Ecology Research. Guiyang: Guizhou Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongyan Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zihan Jiang
    • 1
  • Jingxi Dai
    • 1
  • Xiuchen Wu
    • 2
  • Jian Peng
    • 1
  • Hongya Wang
    • 1
  • Jeroen Meersmans
    • 3
  • Sophie M. Green
    • 4
  • Timothy A. Quine
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Urban and Environmental Sciences and MOE Laboratory for Earth Surface ProcessesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Geographical SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Cranfield Soil and Agrifood Institute, School of Water, Energy and EnvironmentCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK
  4. 4.Geography, CLESUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations