Advertisement

Cyclic posets and triangulation clusters

  • Kiyoshi Igusa
  • Gordana TodorovEmail author
Articles Special Topic on Cluster Algebras

Abstract

Triangulated categories coming from cyclic posets were originally introduced by the authors in a previous paper as a generalization of the constructions of various triangulated categories with cluster structures. We give an overview, and then analyze “triangulation clusters” which are those corresponding to topological triangulations of the 2-disk. Locally finite nontriangulation clusters give topological triangulations of the “cactus space” associated to the “cactus cyclic poset”.

Keywords

cactus cyclic poset cluster structure triangulated categories Frobenius categories cocycle 

MSC(2010)

18E30 16G20 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professors Bin Zhu, Fang Li and Zongzhu Lin for their hospitality at Tsinghua University and at the Chern Institute of Mathematics during the Workshop on Cluster Algebras and Related Topics, July 10–13, 2017. A series of lectures on this topic were given by the authors, which motivated the beginning of this paper and subsequent work for the rest of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Amiot C. On generalized cluster categories. In: Representations of Algebras and Related Topics. EMS Series of Congress Reports. Zürich: Eur Math Soc, 2011, 1–53Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buan A B, Iyama O, Reiten I, et al. Cluster structures for 2-Calabi-Yau categories and unipotent groups. Compos Math, 2009, 145: 1035–1079MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buan A B, Iyama O, Reiten I, et al. Mutation of cluster-tilting objects and potentials. Amer J Math, 2011, 133: 835–887MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buan A B, Marsh R J, Reiten I, et al. Tilting theory and cluster combinatorics. Adv Math, 2006, 204: 572–618MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldero P, Chapoton F, Schiffler R. Quivers with relations arising from clusters (A n case). Trans Amer Math Soc, 2006, 358: 1347–1364MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drinfeld V. On the notion of geometric realization. Mosc Math J, 2004, 4: 619–626MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gratz S, Holm T, Jørgensen P. Cluster tilting subcategories and torsion pairs in Igusa-Todorov cluster categories of Dynkin type A . Math Z, 2019, in pressGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Happel D. Triangulated Categories in the Representation Theory of Finite Dimensional Algebras. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Seres, vol. 119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holm T, Jørgensen P. On a cluster category of infinite Dynkin type, and the relation to triangulations of the infinity-gon. Math Z, 2012, 270: 277–295MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holm T, Jørgensen P. Cluster tilting vs. weak cluster tilting in Dynkin type A infinity. Forum Math, 2015, 27: 1117–1137MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Igusa K, Todorov G. Continuous Frobenius categories. In: Algebras, Quivers and Representations. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2013, 115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Igusa K, Todorov G. Cluster categories coming from cyclic posets. Comm Algebra, 2015, 43: 4367–4402MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Igusa K, Todorov G. Continuous cluster categories I. Algebr Represent Theory, 2015, 18: 65–101MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jørgensen P, Yakimov M. c-vectors of 2-Calabi-Yau categories and Borel subalgebras of sl . ArXiv:1710.06492, 2017Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu S, Paquette C. Cluster categories of type A and triangulations of the infinite strip. Math Z, 2017, 286: 197–222MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Megiddo N. Partial and complete cyclic orders. Bull Amer Math Soc, 1976, 82: 274–276MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi X P. On flatness properties of cyclic S-posets. Semigroup Forum, 2008, 77: 248–266MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Roosmalen A-C. Hereditary uniserial categories with Serre duality. Algebr Represent Theory, 2012, 15: 1291–1322MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang X, Zhang W L, Knauer U. A characterization of a pomonoid S-posets are regular injective. Categor Gen Algebr Structures Appl, 2013, 1: 103–117zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations