Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1404–1425 | Cite as

The Payouts Choice for Deposit Insurance System

  • Yiming Chang
  • Shangmei ZhaoEmail author
  • Fei Hu


Entropy balancing is introduced to assess the deposit insurance design characteristics in this paper. Applying an extensive duration data including 141 countries from 1960 to 2015, the authors employ the entropy balancing method to simulate the data structure under the implicit deposit insurance system. Then the paper adopts an endogenous treatment effects model and a Heckman two-step selection model to examine payouts choice of the deposit insurance. It is found that entropy balancing can calibrate unit weights and reweight treatment and control groups by a maximum entropy scheme. Thus, a possibly given conditions will be satisfied and information concerning sample moments will be integrated. The results show clearly that different payouts choice and the corresponding coverage setting can effectively reduce the moral hazards that may result from the introduction of a deposit insurance scheme. When the Payouts is Per Depositor Account or Per Depositor, the banks’ moral hazard is higher. However, the payment method of Per Depositor Per Institution can effectively restrain the banks’ risk-taking activities.


Deposit insurance entropy balancing payouts choice treatment effects 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Diamond D W and Dybvig P H, Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity, J. Polit. Econ, 1983, 91(3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Demirgüç-Kunt A, Kane E J, and Laeven L, Deposit insurance design and implementation: Policy lessons from research and practice, The World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, No. 3969, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Barth J R, Caprio Jr G, and Levine R, Bank regulation and supervision: What works best?, J. Finan. Intermediation, 2004, 13(2): 205–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Angkinand A and Wihlborg C, Deposit insurance coverage, ownership, and banks’ risk-taking in emerging markets, J. Int. Money. Finance, 2010, 29(2): 252–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Watson S K and Elliot M, Entropy balancing: A maximum-entropy reweighting scheme to adjust for coverage error, Qual Quant., 2016, 50(4): 1781–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Demirgüç-Kunt A, Karacaovali B, and Laeven L, Deposit insurance around the world: A comprehensive database, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3628, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Demirgüç-Kunt A, Kane E J, and Laeven L, Deposit Insurance Database No. WP-14118, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kroszner R S and Strahan P E, What drives deregulation? Economics and politics of the relaxation of bank branching restrictions, Q. J Econ., 1999, 114(4): 1437–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Demirgüç-Kunt A, Kane E J, and Laeven L, Determinants of deposit-insurance adoption and design, J. Financ. Intermediation, 2008, 17(3): 407–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shy O, Stenbacka R, and Yankov V, Limited deposit insurance coverage and bank competition, J. Bank. Financ., 2016, 71(1): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ho D E, Imai K, King G, et al., Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference, Polit Anal., 2007, 15(3): 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Sekhon J S, Opiates for the matches: Matching methods for causal inference, Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 2009, 12(1): 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Curto-Grau M, Voters’ responsiveness to public employment policies, Pub. Choice, 2017, 170(1): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Abadie A and Imbens G W, Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects, National Bureau of Economic Research Technical Working Paper Series, No. 283, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Diamond A and Sekhon J S, Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multi-variate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies, Rev. Econ. Stat., 2012, 95(3): 932–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Iacus S M, King G, and Porro G, Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching, Polit. Anal., 2012, 20(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hainmueller J, Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate re observational studies, Polit. Anal., 2012, 20(1): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hirano K, Imbens G W, and Ridder G, Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score, Econometrica, 2003, 71(4): 1161–1189.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Zhi-Quan L and Wei Y, An introduction to convex optimization for communications and signal processing, IEEE J. Select. Areas.Communicat., 2006, 24(8): 1426–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Aiyagari S R, Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving, Q. J. Econ., 1994, 109(3): 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Saunders A and Schumacher L, The determinants of bank interest rate margins: An international study, J. Int. Money. Finance, 2000, 19(6): 813–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Liu X, Zhang W, Xiong X, et al., Credit rationing and the simulation of bank-small and medium sized firm artificial credit market, Journal of Systems Science &ampl Complexity, 2016, 29(4): 991–1017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Jayaratne J and Strahan P E, The finance-growth nexus: Evidence from bank branch deregulation, Q. J. Econ., 1996, 111(3): 639–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Barth J R, Jr G C, and Levine R, Bank regulation and supervision in 180 countries from 1999 to 2011, J. Finan. Econ. Pol., 2013, 5(2): 111–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Li J, Liang C, Zhu X, et al., Risk contagion in Chinese banking industry: A transfer entropy-based analysis, Entropy, 2013, 15(12): 5550–5561.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Laeven L, The political economy of deposit insurance, J. Financ. Serv. Res., 2004, 26(3): 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Deb P and Trivedi P K, Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of a negative binomial regression model with multinomial endogenous treatment, Stata. J., 2006, 6(2): 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Maddala G S, Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Greene W H, Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2012.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Heckman J J, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 1979, 47(1): 153–161.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Belsley D A, A guide to using the collinearity diagnostics, Computational Econ., 1991, 4(1): 33–50.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Merton R C, An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees: An application of modern option pricing theory, J. Bank. Financ., 1977, 1(1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Greene W H, Sample selection bias as a specification error: A comment, Econometrica, 1981, 49(3): 795–798.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Demirgüç-Kunt A and Kane E J, Deposit insurance around the globe: Where does it work?, J. Econ. Perspect., 2002, 16(2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editorial Office of JSSC & Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Market and Price, National Development and Reform CommissionBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations