Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 820–840

# Adjusted Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Distribution Function and Quantile with Nonignorable Missing Data

Article

## Abstract

This paper considers the estimation problem of distribution functions and quantiles with nonignorable missing response data. Three approaches are developed to estimate distribution functions and quantiles, i.e., the Horvtiz-Thompson-type method, regression imputation method and augmented inverse probability weighted approach. The propensity score is specified by a semiparametric exponential tilting model. To estimate the tilting parameter in the propensity score, the authors propose an adjusted empirical likelihood method to deal with the over-identified system. Under some regular conditions, the authors investigate the asymptotic properties of the proposed three estimators for distribution functions and quantiles, and find that these estimators have the same asymptotic variance. The jackknife method is employed to consistently estimate the asymptotic variances. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed methodologies.

## Keywords

Adjusted empirical likelihood distribution estimation exponential tilting model nonignorable missing data quantile

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

1. [1]
Little R J and Rubin D B, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 2002.
2. [2]
Kim J K and Shao J, Statistical Methods for Handling Incomplete Data, CRC Press, 2013.
3. [3]
Qin J, Leung D, Shao J, Estimation with survey data under nonignorable nonresponse or informative sampling, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2002, 97(457): 193–200.
4. [4]
Zhao J and Shao J, Approximate conditional likelihood for generalized linear models with general missing data mechanism, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2017, 30(1): 139–153.
5. [5]
Kim J K and Yu C L, A semiparametric estimation of mean functionals with nonignorable missing data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2011, 106(493): 157–165.
6. [6]
Zhao H, Zhao P Y, and Tang N S, Empirical likelihood inference for mean functionals with nonignorably missing response data, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2013, 66(66): 101–116.
7. [7]
Tang N, Zhao P, and Zhu H, Empirical likelihood for estimating equations with nonignorably missing data, Statistica Sinica, 2014, 24(2): 723.
8. [8]
Shao J and Wang L, Semiparametric inverse propensity weighting for nonignorable missing data, Biometrika, 2016, 103(1): 175–187.
9. [9]
Wang S, Shao J, and Kim J K, An instrumental variable approach for identification and estimation with nonignorable nonresponse, Statistica Sinica, 2014, 24(3): 1097–1116.
10. [10]
Tang G, Little R J, and Raghunathan T E, Analysis of multivariate missing data with nonignorable nonresponse, Biometrika, 2003, 90(4): 747–764.
11. [11]
Zhao J and Shao J, Semiparametric Pseudo-likelihoods in generalized linear models with nonignorable missing data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2015, 110(512): 1577–1590.
12. [12]
Miao W, Ding P, and Geng Z, Identifiability of normal and normal mixture models with nonignorable missing data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2016, 111(516): 1673–1683.
13. [13]
Fang F and Shao J, Model selection with nonignorable nonresponse, Biometrika, 2016, 103(4): 861–874.
14. [14]
Nadaraya E A, Some new estimates for distribution functions, Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 1964, 9(3): 497–500.
15. [15]
Nadaraya E A, On estimating regression, Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 1964, 9(1): 141–142.
16. [16]
Watson G S, Smooth regression analysis, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics Series A, 1964, 26(4): 359–372.
17. [17]
Chen J and Wu C, Estimation of distribution function and quantiles using model-calibrated pseudo empirical likelihood method, Statistica Sinica, 2002, 12(4): 1223–1239.
18. [18]
Cheng P E and Chu C K, Kernel estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with missing data, Statistica Sinica, 1996, 6(1): 63–78.
19. [19]
Liu X, Liu P, and Zhou Y, Distribution estimation with auxiliary information for missing data, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2011, 141(2): 711–724.
20. [20]
Hu Z, Follmann D A, and Qin J, Dimension reduced kernel estimation for distribution function with incomplete data, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2011, 141(9): 3084–3093.
21. [21]
Zhao P Y, Tang M L, and Tang N S, Robust estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with non-ignorable missing data, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 2013, 41(4): 575–595.
22. [22]
Chen J, Variyath A M, and Abraham B, Adjusted empirical likelihood and its properties, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2008, 17(2): 426–443.
23. [23]
Owen A B, Empirical Likelihood, CRC Press, Florida, 2001.
24. [24]
Horvitz D G and Thompson D J, A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1952, 47(260): 663–685.
25. [25]
Kang J D Y and Schafer J L, Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data, Statistical Science, 2006, 22(4): 574–580.
26. [26]
Robins J M, Rotnitzky A, and Zhao L P, Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1994, 89(427): 846–866.
27. [27]
Qin J, Shao J, and Zhang B, Efficient and doubly robust imputation for covariate-dependent missing responses, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2008, 103(482): 797–810.
28. [28]
Ogburn E L, Rotnitzky A, and Robins J M, Doubly robust estimation of the local average treatment effect curve, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2015, 77(2): 373–396.
29. [29]
Chang T, Kott P S, Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse under a plausible model, Biometrika, 2008, 95(3): 555–571.
30. [30]
Newey W K and Smith R J, Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators, Econometrica, 2004, 72(1): 219–255.
31. [31]
Qin J and Lawless J, Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations, Annals of Statistics, 1994, 22(1): 300–325.
32. [32]
Liu Y and Chen J, Adjusted empirical likelihood with high-order precision, Annals of Statistics, 2010, 38(3): 1341–1362.
33. [33]
Chen X, Wan A T K, and Zhou Y, Efficient quantile regression analysis with missing observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2015, 110(510): 723–741.
34. [34]
Wang Q, Linton O, and Härdle W, Semiparametric regression analysis with missing response at random, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2004, 99(466): 334–345.
35. [35]
Shao J and Sitter R R, Bootstrap for imputed survey data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1996, 91(435): 1278–1288.
36. [36]
Wang D and Chen S X, Empirical likelihood for estimating equations with missing values, Annals of Statistics, 2009, 37(1): 490–517.