Advertisement

Predicting teachers’ continuance in a virtual learning environment with psychological ownership and the TAM: a perspective from Malaysia

  • Joanne Sau-Ching YimEmail author
  • Priscilla Moses
  • Alia Azalea
Development Article

Abstract

Psychological ownership (PO) is a sense of being psychologically tied to an object to the extent that it becomes part of the extended self. As technology becomes ubiquitous in daily lives, research have shown the potential of this concept to influence users’ behavior. Hence, this study incorporates PO and its antecedents with the beliefs of perceived ease of use (PEU) and perceived usefulness (PU) to predict teachers’ intention to continue using a cloud-based virtual learning environment (cVLE). A hypothesized model with direct and mediated relationships was tested with data obtained from 1068 practicing secondary school teachers using the cVLE. Results from structural equation modeling supported the model, which explained 56.3% of variance in continuance intention with sufficient predictive relevance (Stone–Geisser Q2 = 0.463). Results demonstrated that the tenets of PO hold true in the cVLE context, as a significant influence to PEU and PU, as well as a significant mediator in the hypothesized model. PEU was found to have a stronger effect than PU on continuance intention, implying its importance despite teachers having gained experience in using it and the cVLE considered as user-friendly.

Keywords

Continuance intention Psychological ownership Perceived ease of use Perceived usefulness Cloud-based virtual learning environment 

Notes

Funding

This research is funded by Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Research Fund (UTARRF) Grant Number 6200/P23.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Awang, H., Aji, Z. M., Mohd Yaakob, M. F., Sheik Osman, W. R., Mukminin, A., & Habibi, A. (2018). Teachers’ intention to continue using virtual learning environment (VLE): Malaysian context. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barki, H., Paré, G., & Sicotte, C. (2008). Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of non-social perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation–confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 318–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchem, I., Tur, G., & Hölterhof, T. (2014). Learner control in personal learning environments: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 15(2), 14–53.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C., Zhao, Q., & Wang, J. (2016). Psychological ownership: An empirical study on its antecedents and impacts upon social media loyalty. In Paper presented at the 2016 Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Chiayi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  12. Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Ayub, A. F., & Mahmud, R. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of e-learning in Malaysian secondary schools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 20–33.Google Scholar
  13. Chien, S. P., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). An investigation of teachers’ beliefs and their use of technology-based asessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 198–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, J. F., Bushko, K., & White, J. (2017). Blended beyond borders: A scan of blended learning obstacles and opportunities in Brazil, Malaysia, and South Africa. Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org.
  18. FrogAsia. (2014). About us. https://www.frogasia.com/v3/aboutus/.
  19. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hew, T.-S., & Syed Abdul Kadir, S. L. (2016). Behavioural intention in cloud-based VLE: An extension to Channel Expansion Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang, H., Parolia, N., & Cheng, K. (2016). Willingness and ability to perform information security compliance behavior: Psychological ownership and self-efficacy perspective. In Paper presented at the 20th Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Chiayi, Taiwan. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/57.
  24. Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries—Empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968–10978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karahanna, E., Xu, S. X., & Zhang, N. (2015). Psychological ownership motivation and use of social media. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 185–207.Google Scholar
  26. Klesel, M., Ndicu, M., & Niehaves, B. (2016). Exploring psychological ownership of IT: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth European conference on information systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  27. Kong, S. C., Looi, C. K., Chan, T. W., & Huang, R. (2017). Teacher development in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing for e-learning in school education. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, K. (2011). E-learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers and Education, 56(6), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned bahaviour. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGill, T. J., Klobas, J. E., & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuation of e-learning initiatives. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018, August 12). Malaysian education quality standard 2nd wave. https://moe.gov.my/index.php/en/arkib/pemberitahuan/2018/4183-skpmg2-2018.
  33. Miranda, P., Isaias, P., Costa, C. J., & Pifano, S. (2017). Validation of an e-learning 3.0 critical success factors framework: A qualitative research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paré, G., Sicotte, C., & Jacques, H. (2006). The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierce, J. L., & Jussila, I. (2011). Psychological ownership and the organizational context: Theory, research evidence, and application. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organization. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Source of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pynoo, B., & van Braak, J. (2014). Predicting teachers’ generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramayah, T., Ling, N. S., Taghizadeh, S. K., & Rahman, S. A. (2016). Factors influencing SMEs website continuance intention in Malaysia. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2014). What leads people to keep on e-learning? An empirical analysis of users’ experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1030–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shao, Z. (2018). Examining the impact mechanism of social psychological motivations on individuals’ continuance intention of MOOCs: The moderating effect of gender. Internet Research, 28(1), 232–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shiau, W., & Chau, P. Y. (2016). Understanding behavioral intention to use a cloud computing classroom: A multiple model comparison approach. Information and Management, 53, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, K. (2017). Teachers as self-directed learners. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, T., Grant, G., & Ramirez, A. (2014, January 6–9). Investigating the influence of psychological ownership and resistance on usage intention among physicians. In R. H. Sprague (Ed). Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system science (pp. 2808–2817). Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  46. Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2067–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers’ computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO. (2013). Malaysia education policy review abridged report. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/pdf/M_EPR-abridged-report-Annex-24052013.pdf.
  50. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, W. T., & Wang, C. C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers and Education, 53, 761–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human–computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2017). Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Education Technology Research Development, 65(5), 1195–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yim, J. S. C., Priscilla, M., & Azalea, A. (2018). Effects of psychological ownership on teachers’ beliefs about a cloud-based virtual learning environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(13), 1–19.Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, T., Agarwal, R., & Lucas, H. C. (2011). The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: Personalized product recommendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 859–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao, Q., Chen, C. D., & Wang, J. L. (2016). The effects of psychological ownership and TAM on social media loyalty: An integrated model. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 959–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social ScienceUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar CampusKamparMalaysia
  2. 2.Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Perak Branch CampusKamparMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Creative IndustriesUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Sungai Long CampusKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations