Advertisement

Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US

  • Rick VoithoferEmail author
  • Michael J. Nelson
  • Guang Han
  • Autumm Caines
Research Article

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey of 842 teacher educators at 541 different institutions across the 50 US states that examined the state and direction of technology integration preparation in accredited teacher education programs. Using both descriptive statistics and regression analysis the study provides a general description of the characteristics of these teacher educators, their Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) adoption, and the relationships between individual and institutional factors and their TPACK adoption. The results of the research show that TPACK adoption is generally low among these teacher educators and that there are multiple personal and institutional factors that influence TPACK adoption. The participants had a significant amount of both K12 and teacher education experience and had high levels of comfort with their technological knowledge. Factors that were shown to influence TPACK adoption included the highest degree offered at their institution, their self-rated TPACK score, and their individual adoption of the International Society for Teaching and Education (ISTE) standards. The results address implications for teacher educator professional development and program accreditation.

Keywords

Teacher educators TPACK Technology integration Teacher education 

Notes

Funding

Funding was funded by Ohio State University College of Education and Human Ecology (Grant: Seed Grant).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adamy, P., & Heinecke, W. (2005). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (2000). COMBCHI macro. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~allison/combchi.sas.
  3. Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E. N., & Carbonara, D. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1414–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514.Google Scholar
  4. Baran, E., Bilici, S., Sari, A., & Tondeur, J. (2017). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2, 5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12565.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, T., Swennen, A., & Jones, K. (Eds.). (2011). The professional development of teacher educators. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Becuwe, H., Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., Thys, J., Castelein, E., & Voogt, J. (2017). Conditions for the successful implementation of teacher educator design teams for ICT integration: A Delphi study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 159–172.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2789.Google Scholar
  7. Blackwell, J., & Yost, N. (2013). Technology in the classroom: Teacher education programs and technology: Preparing teacher candidates for working with p-8 students. Childhood Education, 89(5), 325–327.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2013.830918.Google Scholar
  8. Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296220.Google Scholar
  9. Broady, T., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2008). Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 473–485.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x.Google Scholar
  10. Bucci, T., Cherup, S., & Cunningham, A. (2003). ISTE standards in teacher education: A collection of practical examples. Teacher Educator, 39(2), 95–114.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730309555333.Google Scholar
  11. Bullough, R. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 43–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.002.Google Scholar
  12. Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, R. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015.Google Scholar
  14. Chesley, G., & Jordan, J. (2012). What’s missing from teacher prep. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 41–45.Google Scholar
  15. Chuang, H., Weng, C., & Huang, F. (2015). A structure equation model among factors of teachers’ technology integration practice and their TPCK. Computers & Education, 86, 182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.016.Google Scholar
  16. Cochran, K. F., King, R. A., & DeRuiter, J. A. (1991). Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  17. Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education., 19(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00091-4.Google Scholar
  18. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, P. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning communities. Review of Educational Research, 24, 249–305.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1167272.Google Scholar
  19. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2015). CAEP accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://www.caepnet.org/~/media/Files/caep/standards/final-board-amended-20150612.pdf?la=en.
  22. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2016). CAEP accreditation handbook. Washington, DC: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/~/media/CAEP%20Accreditation%20Handbook_March%202016.pdf?la=en.
  23. Davey, R. (2013). The professional identity of teacher educators: Career on the cusp?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Demirdöğen, B., Aydın, S., & Tarkın, A. (2015). Looking at the mirror: A self-study of science teacher educators’ PCK for teaching teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 189–205.Google Scholar
  25. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Dinkelman, T. (2011). Forming a teacher educator identity: Uncertain standards, practice and relationships. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 309–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.588020.Google Scholar
  27. Dinkelman, T., Margolis, J., & Sikkenga, K. (2006). From teacher to teacher educator: Experiences, expectations and expatriation. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 2(1), 5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960600983155.Google Scholar
  28. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319–346.  https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d.Google Scholar
  29. Dong, Y., Chai, C., Sang, G., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2015). Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 158–169.Google Scholar
  30. Downes, T. (1993). Student-teachers’ experience in using computers during teaching practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9(1), 17–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1993.tb00260.x.Google Scholar
  31. Doyle, H., & Reading, C. (2013). Resistance to advocacy: Pre-service teachers recognizing the potential of curriculum-based virtual worlds for TPACK-framed science teaching. Australian Educational Computing, Special Edition: Teaching Teachers for the Future Project, 27(3), 101–108.Google Scholar
  32. Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001.Google Scholar
  33. Dunn, S., & Ridgway, J. (1991a). Computer use during primary school teaching practice: A survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(1), 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00220.x.Google Scholar
  34. Dunn, S., & Ridgway, J. (1991b). Naked into the world: IT experiences on a final primary school teaching practice: A second survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(3), 229–240.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00254.x.Google Scholar
  35. Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members’ use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 123–137.Google Scholar
  36. Elwood, K., & Savenye, W. (2015). A review of technology integration models utilized by pre-service teacher educator programs. In D. Slykhuis & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2295–2300). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  37. Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education., 42(3), 255–284.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.Google Scholar
  38. Figg, C. & Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2017). Developing TPACK in higher education faculty: An elearning mentor strategy. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2319–2323). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/177525/.
  39. Foulger, T., Graziano, K., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.Google Scholar
  40. Friedman, A., Bolick, C., Berson, M., & Porfeli, E. (2009). National educational technology standards and technology beliefs and practices of social studies faculty: Results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 476–487.Google Scholar
  41. Gallagher, T., Griffin, S., Parker, D., Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011). Establishing and sustaining teacher educator professional development in a self-study community of practice: Pre-tenure teacher educators developing professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–890.Google Scholar
  42. Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 193–204.Google Scholar
  43. Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary MA Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598.Google Scholar
  44. Horton, N. J., Lipsitz, S. R., & Parzen, M. (2003). A potential for bias when rounding in multiple imputation. The American Statistician, 57(4), 229–232.  https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130032314.Google Scholar
  45. International Society for Technology in Education (2017). ISTE standards for educators. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators.
  46. International Society of Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE-CAEP standards for teacher educators. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-in-action/caep.
  47. International Society for Technology in Education. (n.d.-a.). Essential conditions. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/essential-conditions.
  48. International Society for Technology in Education (n.d.-b.). ISTE standards. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards.
  49. Izadinia, M. (2014). Teacher educators’ identity: A review of literature. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.947025.Google Scholar
  50. Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003.Google Scholar
  51. Judge, S., & O’Bannon, B. (2008). Faculty integration of technology in teacher preparation: Outcomes of a development model. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390701847435.Google Scholar
  52. Kaufman, K. (2015). Information communication technology: Challenges & some prospects from preservice education to the classroom. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
  53. Kay, R. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408.Google Scholar
  54. Kazu, I., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126–144.  https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i2.261.Google Scholar
  55. Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185–200.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111433651.Google Scholar
  56. Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure (NCES 2008–040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  57. Koch, A., Heo, M., & Kush, J. (2012). Technology integration into pre-service teacher training. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2012010101.Google Scholar
  58. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.Google Scholar
  59. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.Google Scholar
  61. Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793–809.Google Scholar
  62. Korthagen, F. (2000). Teacher educators: From neglected group to spearhead in the development of education. In G. M. Willems, J. Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Trends in Dutch Teacher Education (pp. 35–48). Leuven-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  63. Koster, B. (2002). Teacher educators under the microscope: The development of a professional profile for teacher educators and the effects of their examination of this profile on their self-diagnosis. (Doctoral thesis). WCC, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  64. Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F. A., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004.Google Scholar
  65. Krumsvik, R. (2008). Situated learning and digital competence. Education and Information Technology, 4(13), 279–290.Google Scholar
  66. Krumsvik, R. (2014). Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273.Google Scholar
  67. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.002.Google Scholar
  68. Lainier, J., & Little, J. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, M., & Tsai, C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the world wide web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4.Google Scholar
  70. Liang, J., Chai, C., Koh, J., Yang, C., & Tsai, C. (2013). Surveying in-service preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.  https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d.Google Scholar
  71. Liaw, S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.029.Google Scholar
  72. Liu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service K12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585929.Google Scholar
  73. Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education., 65(4), 271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386.Google Scholar
  74. Lu, L., & Lei, J. (2012). Using live dual modeling to help preservice teachers develop TPACK. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(1), 14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784699.Google Scholar
  75. Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J., & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Roles, behaviour, and professional development of teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  76. Matthew, K., Stephens, E., Callaway, R., Letendre, C., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2002). Adoption of information communication technology by teacher educators: One-on-one coaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 11(1), 45–62.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390200200122.Google Scholar
  77. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.Google Scholar
  78. Murray, J., & Kosnik, C. (2011). Academic work and identities in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(3), 243–246.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.587982.Google Scholar
  79. Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 125–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.006.Google Scholar
  80. Nelson, M. J. (2017). The role of a mentor teacher’s TPACK in prospective preservice teachers’ intentions to integrate technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
  81. Nelson, M. J., Voithofer, R., & Cheng, S.-L. (2019). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers & Education, 128, 330–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.023.Google Scholar
  82. Novak, D., & Knowles, J. (1991). Beginning elementary teachers’ use of computers in classroom instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 8(2), 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0962029940030206.Google Scholar
  83. Nulty, D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231.Google Scholar
  84. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807.Google Scholar
  85. Oliver, R. (1994). Factors influencing beginning teachers’ uptake of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
  86. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Brush, T., Strycker, J., Gronseth, S., Roman, T., Abaci, S., et al. (2012). Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 399–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.014.Google Scholar
  87. Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241–263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4.Google Scholar
  88. Pasternak, D., Hallman, H., Caughlan, S., Renzi, L., Rush, L., & Meineke, H. (2016). Learning/teaching technology in English teacher education: Findings from a national study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 373–387.Google Scholar
  89. Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). The limits of programmed professional development on integration of information and communication technology in education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1039–1056.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.809.Google Scholar
  90. Phuong, T., Cole, S., & Zarestky, J. (2018). A systematic literature review of faculty development for teacher educators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 373–389.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1351423.Google Scholar
  91. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.Google Scholar
  92. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.Google Scholar
  93. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, K. (2005). Teacher educators’ expertise: What do novice teachers and teacher educators say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 177–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.008.Google Scholar
  95. Snoek, M., Swennen, A., & van der Klink, M. (2011). The quality of teacher educators in the European policy debate: Actions and measures to improve the professionalism of teacher educators. Professional Development of Education, 37(5), 651–664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.616095.Google Scholar
  96. Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  97. Stokes-Beverly, C., & Simoy, I. (2016). Advancing educational technology in teacher preparation: Policy brief. Washington, DC: US Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/teacherprep/.
  98. Swennen, A., Jones, K., & Volman, M. (2010). Teacher educators: Their identities, sub-identities and implications for professional development. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 131–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903457893.Google Scholar
  99. Thomas, L. (1994). NCATE releases new unit accreditation guidelines: Standards for technology are included. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
  100. Thompson, A., Schmidt, D., & Hadjiyianni, E. (1995). A three-year program to infuse technology throughout a teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
  101. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.Google Scholar
  102. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.Google Scholar
  103. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009.Google Scholar
  104. US Department of Education. (2018). Characteristics of Public School Teachers Who Completed Alternative Route to Certification Programs. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_tlc.asp.
  105. Vaughan, M., Beers, C., & Burnaford, G. (2015). The impact of iPads on teacher educator practice: A collaborative professional development initiative. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  106. Weiner, L. (2007). A lethal threat to US teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(4), 274–286.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107305603.Google Scholar
  107. Western Governors University. (2018). Online Education Degrees. Retrieved from https://www.wgu.edu/online-teaching-degrees.html.
  108. Wiebe, J., & Taylor, H. (1997). What should teachers know about technology? A revised look at the ISTE foundations. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(4), 5–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.1997.10784319.Google Scholar
  109. Williams, J. (2014). Teacher educator professional learning in the third space: Implications for identity and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 315–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533128.Google Scholar
  110. Williams, J., Ritter, J., & Bullock, S. (2012). Understanding the complexity of becoming a teacher educator: Experience, belonging, and practice within a professional learning community. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 245–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2012.719130.Google Scholar
  111. Wilson, E. (2013). E-learning and life-long learning: A descriptive case study from a teacher educator’s perspective: 1995-2013. In M. Ciussi & M. Augier (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on E-learning (pp. 531–537). UK: Academic Conferences International Limited.Google Scholar
  112. Zeichner, K. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 59–64.Google Scholar
  113. Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.001.Google Scholar
  114. Zeichner, K., & Peña-Sandoval, C. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the US: The role of the new schools venture fund. Teachers College Record, 117(5), 1–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Agricultural Education & StudiesIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.University of Michigan – DearbornDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations