Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US
This study presents the results of a survey of 842 teacher educators at 541 different institutions across the 50 US states that examined the state and direction of technology integration preparation in accredited teacher education programs. Using both descriptive statistics and regression analysis the study provides a general description of the characteristics of these teacher educators, their Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) adoption, and the relationships between individual and institutional factors and their TPACK adoption. The results of the research show that TPACK adoption is generally low among these teacher educators and that there are multiple personal and institutional factors that influence TPACK adoption. The participants had a significant amount of both K12 and teacher education experience and had high levels of comfort with their technological knowledge. Factors that were shown to influence TPACK adoption included the highest degree offered at their institution, their self-rated TPACK score, and their individual adoption of the International Society for Teaching and Education (ISTE) standards. The results address implications for teacher educator professional development and program accreditation.
KeywordsTeacher educators TPACK Technology integration Teacher education
Funding was funded by Ohio State University College of Education and Human Ecology (Grant: Seed Grant).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adamy, P., & Heinecke, W. (2005). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
- Allison, P. (2000). COMBCHI macro. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~allison/combchi.sas.
- Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E. N., & Carbonara, D. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1414–1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514.Google Scholar
- Bates, T., Swennen, A., & Jones, K. (Eds.). (2011). The professional development of teacher educators. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Becuwe, H., Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., Thys, J., Castelein, E., & Voogt, J. (2017). Conditions for the successful implementation of teacher educator design teams for ICT integration: A Delphi study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2789.Google Scholar
- Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
- Chesley, G., & Jordan, J. (2012). What’s missing from teacher prep. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 41–45.Google Scholar
- Cochran, K. F., King, R. A., & DeRuiter, J. A. (1991). Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2015). CAEP accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://www.caepnet.org/~/media/Files/caep/standards/final-board-amended-20150612.pdf?la=en.
- Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2016). CAEP accreditation handbook. Washington, DC: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/~/media/CAEP%20Accreditation%20Handbook_March%202016.pdf?la=en.
- Davey, R. (2013). The professional identity of teacher educators: Career on the cusp?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Demirdöğen, B., Aydın, S., & Tarkın, A. (2015). Looking at the mirror: A self-study of science teacher educators’ PCK for teaching teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 189–205.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d.Google Scholar
- Dong, Y., Chai, C., Sang, G., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2015). Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 158–169.Google Scholar
- Downes, T. (1993). Student-teachers’ experience in using computers during teaching practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1993.tb00260.x.Google Scholar
- Doyle, H., & Reading, C. (2013). Resistance to advocacy: Pre-service teachers recognizing the potential of curriculum-based virtual worlds for TPACK-framed science teaching. Australian Educational Computing, Special Edition: Teaching Teachers for the Future Project, 27(3), 101–108.Google Scholar
- Dunn, S., & Ridgway, J. (1991a). Computer use during primary school teaching practice: A survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00220.x.Google Scholar
- Dunn, S., & Ridgway, J. (1991b). Naked into the world: IT experiences on a final primary school teaching practice: A second survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00254.x.Google Scholar
- Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members’ use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 123–137.Google Scholar
- Elwood, K., & Savenye, W. (2015). A review of technology integration models utilized by pre-service teacher educator programs. In D. Slykhuis & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2295–2300). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
- Figg, C. & Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2017). Developing TPACK in higher education faculty: An elearning mentor strategy. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2319–2323). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/177525/.
- Foulger, T., Graziano, K., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.Google Scholar
- Friedman, A., Bolick, C., Berson, M., & Porfeli, E. (2009). National educational technology standards and technology beliefs and practices of social studies faculty: Results from a seven-year longitudinal study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 476–487.Google Scholar
- Gallagher, T., Griffin, S., Parker, D., Kitchen, J., & Figg, C. (2011). Establishing and sustaining teacher educator professional development in a self-study community of practice: Pre-tenure teacher educators developing professionally. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 880–890.Google Scholar
- Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 193–204.Google Scholar
- International Society for Technology in Education (2017). ISTE standards for educators. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators.
- International Society of Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE-CAEP standards for teacher educators. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-in-action/caep.
- International Society for Technology in Education. (n.d.-a.). Essential conditions. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/essential-conditions.
- International Society for Technology in Education (n.d.-b.). ISTE standards. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards.
- Kaufman, K. (2015). Information communication technology: Challenges & some prospects from preservice education to the classroom. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Kay, R. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408.Google Scholar
- Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational technology in teacher education programs for initial licensure (NCES 2008–040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.Google Scholar
- Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.Google Scholar
- Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793–809.Google Scholar
- Korthagen, F. (2000). Teacher educators: From neglected group to spearhead in the development of education. In G. M. Willems, J. Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Trends in Dutch Teacher Education (pp. 35–48). Leuven-Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
- Koster, B. (2002). Teacher educators under the microscope: The development of a professional profile for teacher educators and the effects of their examination of this profile on their self-diagnosis. (Doctoral thesis). WCC, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Krumsvik, R. (2008). Situated learning and digital competence. Education and Information Technology, 4(13), 279–290.Google Scholar
- Lainier, J., & Little, J. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J., & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Roles, behaviour, and professional development of teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Matthew, K., Stephens, E., Callaway, R., Letendre, C., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2002). Adoption of information communication technology by teacher educators: One-on-one coaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 11(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390200200122.Google Scholar
- Nelson, M. J. (2017). The role of a mentor teacher’s TPACK in prospective preservice teachers’ intentions to integrate technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
- Oliver, R. (1994). Factors influencing beginning teachers’ uptake of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
- Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Brush, T., Strycker, J., Gronseth, S., Roman, T., Abaci, S., et al. (2012). Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.014.Google Scholar
- Pasternak, D., Hallman, H., Caughlan, S., Renzi, L., Rush, L., & Meineke, H. (2016). Learning/teaching technology in English teacher education: Findings from a national study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 373–387.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.Google Scholar
- Snoek, M., Swennen, A., & van der Klink, M. (2011). The quality of teacher educators in the European policy debate: Actions and measures to improve the professionalism of teacher educators. Professional Development of Education, 37(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.616095.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Stokes-Beverly, C., & Simoy, I. (2016). Advancing educational technology in teacher preparation: Policy brief. Washington, DC: US Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/teacherprep/.
- Thomas, L. (1994). NCATE releases new unit accreditation guidelines: Standards for technology are included. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
- Thompson, A., Schmidt, D., & Hadjiyianni, E. (1995). A three-year program to infuse technology throughout a teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
- Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.Google Scholar
- Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.Google Scholar
- US Department of Education. (2018). Characteristics of Public School Teachers Who Completed Alternative Route to Certification Programs. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_tlc.asp.
- Vaughan, M., Beers, C., & Burnaford, G. (2015). The impact of iPads on teacher educator practice: A collaborative professional development initiative. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
- Western Governors University. (2018). Online Education Degrees. Retrieved from https://www.wgu.edu/online-teaching-degrees.html.
- Wilson, E. (2013). E-learning and life-long learning: A descriptive case study from a teacher educator’s perspective: 1995-2013. In M. Ciussi & M. Augier (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on E-learning (pp. 531–537). UK: Academic Conferences International Limited.Google Scholar
- Zeichner, K. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 59–64.Google Scholar
- Zeichner, K., & Peña-Sandoval, C. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the US: The role of the new schools venture fund. Teachers College Record, 117(5), 1–44.Google Scholar