Advertisement

The cultural interface tension: doing Indigenous work in the academy

  • 1 Accesses

Abstract

This article explores Vanessa Anthony-Stevens and Sammy Matsaw’s paper “The productive uncertainty of Indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers”. That paper reports on a small qualitative study on how STEM students in the field of natural resources management react to the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in their interdisciplinary research methodologies course. The authors are engaging contested intersections of knowledge that are notoriously difficult to negotiate. I argue that the inclusion of Indigenous ‘ways of knowing’ into the water resource management curriculum is based on Morgan’s (in: McKinley, Smith (eds) Handbook of indigenous education, Springer, Singapore, pp 111–128, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0) idea of the ‘guest paradigm’. At the same time, and in contrast, I also argue that the inclusion of Indigenous knowledge in the curriculum cannot just occur in the classroom but needs to be considered at an institutional and individual level as well. The project should be seen as a small step within a wider Indigenous agenda of decolonizing the Eurocentric curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Publishers.

  2. Grande, S. (2019). Refusing the settler society of the spectacle. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1013–1027). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0.

  3. Jackson, M. (2019). In the end “The hope of decolonization”. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 101–110). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0.

  4. McKinley, E. (2007). Bodies of knowledge: Narratives of colonialism, science and education. In K. Tobin & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), The culture of science education (pp. 343–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  5. McKinley, E., & Gan, M. (2014). Culturally responsive science education for Indigenous and ethnic minority students. In S. Abell, & Lederman, N. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Volume II (pp. 284–300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  6. McKinley, E., & Smith, L. T. (2019). Towards self-determination in Indigenous education research: An introduction. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1–15). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0.

  7. Morgan, B. (2019). Beyond the guest paradigm: Eurocentric education and aboriginal peoples in NSW. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 111–128). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0.

  8. Morse, J. (2006). The politics of evidence. Qualitative Health Research,16(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285482.

  9. Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education (Supplement),36, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004646.

  10. Neri, R. C., Lozano, M., & Gomez, L. M. (2019). (Re)framing resistance to culturally relevant education as a multilevel learning problem. Review of Research in Education,43, 197–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821120.

  11. Smith, G. H. (1997). Kaupapa Māori: Theory and praxis. PhD Thesis and Monograph. Auckland, New Zealand: The International Research Institute of Māori and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, University of Auckland.

  12. Smith, G. H., & Smith, L. T. (2019). Doing Indigenous work: Decolonizing and transforming the academy. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous education (pp. 1075–1101). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Elizabeth McKinley.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead editor: Michael J. Reiss.

This review essay addresses issues raised in Vanessa Anthony-Stevens and Sammy Matsaw’s paper entitled: The productive uncertainty of indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09942-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKinley, E. The cultural interface tension: doing Indigenous work in the academy. Cult Stud of Sci Educ (2020) doi:10.1007/s11422-019-09963-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Indigenous knowledges
  • Decolonizing methodologies
  • Ways of knowing
  • Indigenous curriculum