Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 515–523 | Cite as

Teacher education at the intersection of race and ability

  • Gina TesorieroEmail author
Forum

Abstract

In this dialogue with Phillip A. Boda’s Conceptualizing the margins into science education praxis: disability as case in point, I would like to continue the conversation on an equity-focused graduate course meant to prepare pre-service educators to value and leverage diversity in the classroom. While Boda’s analysis revealed that graduate students struggled to attend to disability as a marker of diversity when planning classroom activities, a similar study conducted by Waitoller and Kozleski (Teach Teach Educ Int J Res Stud 31:35–45, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006) showed that graduate students often attended to disability over cultural diversity. Both studies point to the need for teacher preparation programs that prepare educators to create inclusive environments that support, value, and empower students at the intersection of various forms of diversity. This article will leverage axiological shifts noted in graduate students’ reflections from Boda’s study to start a discussion about Waitoller and Kozleski’s view of inclusive education. Pulling from scholarship on asset-based pedagogies and my experience as an urban science educator in special education settings, I will discuss opportunities to create educator learning experiences that can connect theory and practice.

Keywords

Special Education Science education Teacher education Cultural diversity Inclusion 

Notes

References

  1. Alim, H. S., Baglieri, S., Ladson-Billings, G., Paris, D., Rose, D. H., & Valente, J. M. (2017). Responding to “cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability”. A Harvard educational review forum. Harvard Educational Review, 87(1), 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annamma, S., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, Christine. (2012). Disability studies and inclusive teacher preparation: A socially just path for teacher education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(2), 89–99.  https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812802573611.Google Scholar
  4. Baglieri, S., Bejoian, L. M., Broderick, A. A., Connor, D. J., & Valle, J. (2011). (Re)Claiming “inclusive education” toward cohesion in educational reform: Disability studies unravels the myth of the normal child. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2122–2154.Google Scholar
  5. Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K. D., et al. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: LIFE Center and Center for Multicultural Education (University of Washington).Google Scholar
  6. Basu, S. J., Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2011). Democratic science teaching: Building the expertise to empower low-income minority youth in science. Rotterdam: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-370-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, D., & Monahan, P. (2013). NYSCI Design Lab: No bored kids. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: growing the next generation of stem innovators. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, E., & Lotan, Rachel A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emdin, C. (2016). For White folks who teach in the hood … and the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Emdin, C. (2017). Destroying the spectacle in urban education: Embracing the new danger. In G. Sirrakos & C. Emdin (Eds.), Between the world and the urban classroom (Transgressions (Rotterdam, Netherlands)). Rotterdam: Sense.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-032-5_6.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world., New directions in critical theory New York: Columbia University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2008.10.007.Google Scholar
  13. Hammerness, K., MacPherson, A., Macdonald, M., Roditi, H., & Curtis-Bey, L. (2017). What does it take to sustain a productive partnership in education? Phi Delta Kappan, 99(1), 15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717728272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lauffer, H. B. (2010). SIMPL: A framework for designing and facilitating professional development to change classroom practice. Science Teacher Education, 58, 13–28.Google Scholar
  16. Mendoza, E., Paguyo, C., & Gutierrez, K. (2016). Understanding the intersection of race and disability: Common sense notions of learning and culture. In D. Connor, A. B. Ferri, & A. S. Annamma (Eds.), DisCrit: Disability studies and critical race theory in education., Disability, culture, and equity series New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of: The learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paris, D. (2017). On Culturally Sustaining Teachers. Equity by Design. Indianapolis: Midwest & Plains Equity Assistance Center (MAP EAC).Google Scholar
  20. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world., Language and literacy series (New York, N.Y.) New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  23. Sirrakos, J. G. (2017). Beyond a deficit perspective: From the Greek financial crisis to urban students of color. In G. Sirrakos & C. Emdin (Eds.), Between the world and the urban classroom (Transgressions (Rotterdam, Netherlands)). Rotterdam: Sense.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-032-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thorius, K., & Waitoller, F. (2017). Strategic coalitions against exclusion at the intersection of race and disability–A rejoinder. Harvard Educational Review, 87(2), 251–257.  https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-87.2.251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waitoller, F., & Artiles, A. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319–356.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Waitoller, F., & Artiles, A. (2016). Teacher learning as curating: Becoming inclusive educators in school/university partnerships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 360–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waitoller, F., & Kozleski, E. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 31(3), 35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waitoller, F. R., & Thorius, K. A. K. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366–389.  https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Washington’s College of Education in Learning SciencesSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations