Advertisement

A cultural-historical perspective on the multimodal development of concepts in science lectures

  • Lilian PozzerEmail author
  • Wolff-Michael Roth
Original Paper

Abstract

As part of a series of investigations in which we explore the integration of verbal and nonverbal aspects of communication into a dialectical, sense-constitutive unit during science lectures, this study adapts the notions of catchments (i.e., repetitions of essential features of the gesture-speech dialectic) and growth points (i.e., moments in which ideas in the form of a gesture-speech dialectic are born) to analyze, from a multimodal communicative perspective, the articulation and development of scientific concepts in the course of several consecutive lessons dealing with the circulatory system. The presence of catchments and the identification of growth points within and across lessons allow us to understand how scientific concepts are instantiated (i.e., taught) in and during science lectures. The results of our analysis make evident the dialectical relations between the various semiotic resources that are integrated into the communicative unit, helping us elucidate teaching of scientific concepts as a process, a drama in several acts, that unfolds in time and across consecutive lectures.

Keywords

Multimodality Gestures Dialectics Cultural-historical activity theory Speech activity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research project from which this article derives was funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to Wolff-Michael Roth. We thank the students for their participation in this project, and we would like to express our gratitude especially to Mr. Burl Jantzen, for his collaboration and interest in this project. We thank Diego M. Ardenghi for helping us with the videotaping and subsequent transcribing of the videotapes. We thank reviewers and journal editors for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript, which helped us improve the article.

References

  1. Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G., & Ritchie, S. M. (Eds.). (2006). Metaphor and analogy in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5.Google Scholar
  2. Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition [Difference and repetition]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  3. El’konin, B. D. (1994). Vvedenie v psixologiju razvitija: b tradicii kul’turno-istoričeskoj teorii L. S. Vygotskogo [Introduction to the psychology of development: in the tradition of the cultural-historical theory of L. S. Vygotsky]. Moscow: Trivola.Google Scholar
  4. Friesen, N. (2011). The lecture as a transmedial pedagogical form. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 95–102.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11404603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friesen, N., & Roth, W.-M. (2014). The anatomy lecture then and now: A Foucauldian analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46, 1111–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.796872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16, 367–371.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum. DOI.Google Scholar
  8. Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996/2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Leont’ev, A. A. (1969/1971). Jazyk, rec’, recevaja dejatel’nost’. Moscow, Russia: Prosveščenje (We checked our translation with the German one, Sprache, Sprechen, Sprechtätigkeit, C. Heeschen, Trans. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. McNeill, D. (1985). Language viewed as action. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 259–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. McNeill, D. (2002). Gesture and language dialectic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 34, 7–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2002.10414607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of perception]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). On performing concepts during science lectures. Science Education, 91(1), 96–114.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2008). Catchments, growth points, and the iterability of signs in classroom communication. Semiotica, 172(1/4), 389–409.  https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2008.105.Google Scholar
  17. Roth, W.-M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1683–1714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00115-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365–392.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roth, W.-M. (2014). Science language Wanted Alive: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin circle. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1049–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999). Decalages in talk and gesture: Visual and verbal semiotics of ecology lectures. Linguistics & Education, 10, 335–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00012-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth, W.-M., & Friesen, N. (2014). History and the relationship between scientific and pedagogical knowledge: Anatomy lectures then and now. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 180–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.773597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roth, W.-M., & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2006). Tracking situated, distributed, and embodied communication in real time. In M. A. Vanchevsky (Ed.), Focus on cognitive psychology research (pp. 237–261). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  23. Schütz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt [The phenomenology of the social world]. Vienna: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  26. Vygotskij, L. S. (1984). Sobranie sočinenij tom 6 [Collected works vol. 6]. Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotskij, L. S. (2001). Lekcii pop pedologgii [Lectures on pedology]. Iževsk: Udmurtskij Universitet.Google Scholar
  28. Vygotskij, L. S. (2005). Psixologija razvitija čeloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow: Eksmo (We checked our translation of the chapter on thinking and speech with the German, Denken und Sprechen, Munich, German: Beltz, 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, Faculty of EducationUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.MacLaurin Building, A567University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations