Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 733–750 | Cite as

Becoming Bermuda grass: mapping and tracing rhizomes to practice reflexivity

  • Christopher D. Murakami
  • Marcelle A. Siegel
Original Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

This narrative project used rhizomatic analysis and reflexivity to describe a layered process of responding to a student’s identity of non-participation within an undergraduate science classroom. Mapping rhizomes represents an ongoing and experimental process in consciousness. Rhizomatic mapping in educational studies is too often left out of the products of academic pursuits. In this paper, we try to capture this process, and let the process capture us. This manuscript starts with a focus on just one student, but maps our reflexive terrain that helped us think in new ways about persistent problems in science learning. As we decided how to address this student’s identity of non-participation, we learned about the intertwined stories of the researchers and the researched and the challenges of designing inclusive learning environments.

Keywords

Rhizome Identity Reflexivity Agroecology 

References

  1. Birmingham, D., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 286–314. doi: 10.1002/tea.21127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi: 10.1002/tea.20269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans. Vol. 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209–230. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fusco, D., & Barton, A. C. (2001). Re-presenting student achievements in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 337–354. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<337::AID-TEA1009>3.0.CO;2-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galt, R. E., Parr, D., Kim, J. V. S., Beckett, J., Lickter, M., & Ballard, H. (2013). Transformative food systems education in a land-grant college of agriculture: The importance of learner-centered inquiries. Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 129–142. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9384-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. doi: 10.3102/0091732X025001099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Holland, R. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52, 463–484. doi: 10.1177/001872679905200403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, Y. J. (2008). Thriving in-between the cracks: Deleuze and guerilla science teaching in Singapore. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 3, 917–935. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9116-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ogden, L. (2011). Swamplife: People, gators, and mangroves entangled in the Everglades. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories in a late modern world. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 18, 101–120.Google Scholar
  16. Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). ‘I’ll be a nothing’: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ronai, C. R. (1998). Sketching with Derrida: An ethnography of a researcher/erotic dancer. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 405–420. doi: 10.1177/107780049800400306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (1st ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sikes, P. (2005). Storying schools: Issues around attempts to create a sense of feel and place in narrative research writing. Qualitative Research, 5, 79–94. doi: 10.1177/1468794105048657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tamboukou, M. (2008). Re-imagining the narratable subject. Qualitative Research, 8, 283–292. doi: 10.1177/1468794106093623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: how middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. doi: 10.1002/tea.21123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Dore, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503–515. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Missouri Assessment Resource CenterColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Learning, Teaching, and Curriculum/BiochemistryUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations