Contribution to activity: a lens for understanding students’ potential and agency in physics education
- 137 Downloads
In this paper I argue for using the concept of contribution to activity to understand student engagement with science education and its transformational potential in formal settings. Drawing on transformative activist stance, I explain contribution as how individuals take part in and transform collective practices according to their own life agendas and get transformed themselves. As contribution to science education is a concept based on transformation, not adaptation, it can be especially informative when examining how underrepresented students in science can be more engaged in science education and eventually science. Using survey, interview and group conversations, and field observations in an undergraduate physics course, I put forward Zoey’s case to illustrate my argument and show how her contribution to the activities in the course initiated change in the activity among her peers.
KeywordsTransformative activist stance (TAS) Contribution to activity Teaching–learning Sociocultural Physics
- Carlone, H. B., Kimmel, J., Lowder, C., Rockford, J., & Scott, C. (2011). Becoming (less) scientific in the figured worlds of school science learning: A longitudinal study of students’ identities. In NARST-2011 annual international conference.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm.
- Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to maste its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–224). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470753545.ch16.
- Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 2, 10–17.Google Scholar
- Ilyenkov, E. V. (2008). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Delhi, India: Aakar Books.Google Scholar
- Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015. Special report NSF 15-311. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
- Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’ s approach to pedagogy teaching–learning and development as activist projects of historical Becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’ s approach to pedagogy. An International Journal, 5(1), 6–16. doi: 10.1080/15544800903406266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stetsenko, A. (2015). Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 102–116). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (2002). Teaching, learning, and development: A post-Vygotskian perspective. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 84–96). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470753545.ch7.
- Vianna, E., Hougaard, N., & Stetsenko, A. (2014). The dialectics of collective and individual transformation: Transformative activist research in a collaborative learning community project. In Collaborative projects: An interdisciplinary study (pp. 59–88). doi: 10.1163/9789004261228.
- Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2006). Embracing history through transforming it: Contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 81–108. doi: 10.1177/0959354306060108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., Pamental, M., & Smaldino, S. (2007). Activity systems analysis as a conceptual tool for organizing complicated activities. In Annual meeting for the american educational research association (pp. 1–24). Chicago.Google Scholar