Clinical Assessments of Hand Function in First Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Do Not Appear to Correlate with Radiographic Findings
- 93 Downloads
Thumb carpometacarpal (first CMC) osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative process affecting hand use, is typically assessed by clinical examination and radiographs. This assessment determines treatment, but it may not reflect functional limitations.
We aimed to explore the relationship between measures of hand function and radiographs in individuals with and without first CMC OA.
We designed a cross-sectional, observational pilot study, enrolling five patients with first CMC OA (nine thumbs with modified Eaton-Littler grades ranging from 1 to 4, using retrospective radiographic data) and nine healthy controls. They underwent evaluation of hand function using four patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)—the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS); the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE); the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH); and the Modified Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (M-SACRAH)—and one performance measure, the Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT). Spearman’s ρ with 95% subject clustered bootstrapped confidence intervals was calculated to assess for correlations between radiographic findings and measures of hand function.
Only the DASH work score showed strong positive correlation with radiographic OA grade, with PSFS, PRWHE, M-SACRAH, and AHFT scores demonstrating low to moderate correlations. Notable differences were found between patients and control subjects in median scores of the DASH, PSFS, PRWHE, and M-SACRAH, as well as in the grip, pinch, and button scores of the AHFT.
While only the DASH work score strongly correlated with radiographic grade of first CMC OA, several measures detected considerable differences in functional hand use between patients and control subjects. The findings of this pilot study suggest that hand function scores be considered in addition to radiographs when determining severity of first CMC OA. The findings can also inform the design of a larger, powered study.
Keywordsfirst carpometacarpal osteoarthritis radiographic grading basilar joint functional hand measures patient reported outcome measures
The authors express appreciation to Roseann Zeldin for help with study coordination.
This study was supported by the Hospital for Special Surgery Radiology and Imaging Department Research Fund.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Gwen Weinstock-Zlotnick, PhD, OTR/L, CHT, and O. Kenechi Nwawka, MD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Bin Lin, ScM, was supported in part by funds from the Clinical Translational Science Center (CTSC), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) grant #UL1- RR024996.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding source NCATS based in Rockville, MD.
- 4.Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Poole JL. Measures of hand function: Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT), Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), Cochin Hand Function Scale, Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), Grip Ability Test (GAT), Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT), and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S189–S199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sautner J, Andel I, Rintelen B, Leeb BF. A comparison of the modified score for the assessment of chronic rheumatoid affections of the hands and the Australian/Canadian osteoarthritis hand index in hand osteoarthritis patients. Int J Rheumatol. 2009;249096. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/249096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Stamm T, Geyh S, Cieza A, Machold K, Kollerits B, Kloppenburg M, Smolen J, Stucki G. Measuring functioning in patients with hand osteoarthritis—content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rheum. 2006;45(12):1534–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.The Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure. Institute for Work and Health. http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/public/translations/DASH_English_UK.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2019.