Simultaneous determination of selegiline, desmethylselegiline, R/S-methamphetamine, and R/S-amphetamine in oral fluid by LC/MS/MS
It is crucial for forensic analysis to differentiate clinical use from illegal abuse. Selegiline (SG) is mainly metabolized to desmethylselegiline (DM-SG), R-(−)-methamphetamine (R-MA) and R-(−)amphetamine (R-AM); while abused methamphetamine and amphetamine mainly contain the S-(+)-form. The aim of this study was to simultaneously determine SG, DM-SG, R/S-MA, and R/S-AM in human oral fluid (OF) and to differentiate clinical use from illegal use. We also aim to apply the present method to the OF samples from authentic cases in forensic toxicology.
Liquid–liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry operating in positive ion multiple-reaction monitoring mode were utilized. The chromatographic system consisted of a ChirobioticTM V2 column (2.1 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) and a mobile phase of methanol containing 0.1% (v/v) glacial acetic acid and 0.02% (v/v) ammonium hydroxide.
Results and conclusions
The calibration curves were linear from 1 to 100 ng/mL, and r > 0.995 for all analytes with imprecisions ≤ 15% and accuracy between 85 and 115%. Extraction recoveries ranged from 46.3 to 104.7% with coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 10.3% and matrix effects (MEs) ranged from 47.4 to 114.8% with CV ≤ 12.9%. The lower limit of quantification was 0.2 ng/mL for SG and DM-SG and 1.0 ng/mL for S-MA, R-MA, S-AM and R-AM. The present method is simple, rapid (accomplished in 12 min), sensitive, and validated by authentic samples.
KeywordsOral fluid Chiral analysis R/S-methamphetamine R/S-amphetamine Selegiline Desmethylselegiline
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFC0800704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772022, 81871531), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17DZ2273200/16DZ2290900), and Ministry of Finance, PR China (GY2017G-1) for their financial support of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the international and/or national committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 8.Newmeyer MN, Concheiro M, da Costa JL, Flegel R, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2015) Oral fluid with three modes of collection and plasma methamphetamine and amphetamine enantiomer concentrations after controlled intranasal l-methamphetamine administration. Drug Test Anal 7(10):877–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Katagi M, Tatsuno M, Miki A, Nishikawa M, Nakajima K, Tsuchihashi H (2001) Simultaneous determination of selegiline-N-oxide, a new indicator for selegiline administration, and other metabolites in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 759(1):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Salonen JS, Nyman L, Boobis AR, Edwards RJ, Watts P, Lake BG, Price RJ, Renwick AB, Gomez-Lechon MJ, Castell JV, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Hidestrand M, Guillouzo A, Corcos L, Goldfarb PS, Lewis DF, Taavitsainen P, Pelkonen O (2003) Comparative studies on the cytochrome p450-associated metabolism and interaction potential of selegiline between human liver-derived in vitro systems. Drug Metab Dispos 31(9):1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.31.9.1093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wurita A, Hasegawa K, Minakata K, Gonmori K, Nozawa H, Yamagishi I, Suzuki O, Watanabe K (2016) Postmortem redistribution of methamphetamine and amphetamine in blood specimens from various blood vessels and in the specimens from pericardial fluid, bile, stomach contents and various solid tissues collected from a human cadaver. Forensic Toxicol 34(1):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-015-0303-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Maurer HH, Kraemer T (1992) Toxicological detection of selegiline and its metabolites in urine using fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and differentiation by enantioselective GC-MS of the intake of selegiline from abuse of methamphetamine or amphetamine. Arch Toxicol 66(9):675–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Reimer ML, Mamer OA, Zavitsanos AP, Siddiqui AW, Dadgar D (1993) Determination of amphetamine, methamphetamine and desmethyldeprenyl in human plasma by gas chromatography/negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Biol Mass Spectrom 22(4):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/bms.1200220404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mohr S, Weiss JA, Spreitz J, Schmid MG (2012) Chiral separation of new cathinone- and amphetamine-related designer drugs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using trifluoroacetyl-l-prolyl chloride as chiral derivatization reagent. J Chromatogr A 1269:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hadener M, Bruni PS, Weinmann W, Frubis M, Konig S (2017) Accelerated quantification of amphetamine enantiomers in human urine using chiral liquid chromatography and on-line column-switching coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 409(5):1291–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0056-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Nishida K, Itoh S, Inoue N, Kudo K, Ikeda N (2006) High-performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of methamphetamine and amphetamine enantiomers, desmethylselegiline and selegiline, in hair samples of long-term methamphetamine abusers or selegiline users. J Anal Toxicol 30(4):232–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Newmeyer MN, Concheiro M, Huestis MA (2014) Rapid quantitative chiral amphetamines liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: method in plasma and oral fluid with a cost-effective chiral derivatizing reagent. J Chromatogr A 1358:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Malakova J, Pavek P, Svecova L, Jokesova I, Zivny P, Palicka V (2009) New high-performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of (R)-warfarin and (S)-warfarin using chiral separation on a glycopeptide-based stationary phase. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 877(27):3226–3230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Alyamani M, Li Z, Upadhyay SK, Anderson DJ, Auchus RJ, Sharifi N (2017) Development and validation of a novel LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of abiraterone and its seven steroidal metabolites in human serum: innovation in separation of diastereoisomers without use of a chiral column. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 172:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Yu J, Tang J, Yuan X, Guo X, Zhao L (2017) Evaluation of the chiral recognition properties and the column performances of three chiral stationary phases based on cellulose for the enantioseparation of six dihydropyridines by high-performance liquid chromatography. Chirality 29(3–4):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/chir.22690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Azzaro AJ, Ziemniak J, Kemper E, Campbell BJ, VanDenBerg C (2007) Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of selegiline following treatment of healthy subjects with the selegiline transdermal system (6 mg/24 h): a comparison with oral selegiline capsules. J Clin Pharmacol 47(10):1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270007304779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar