Advertisement

Utilization and Perceptions of Drop-in Center Services Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness

  • Layla Parast
  • Joan S. Tucker
  • Eric R. Pedersen
  • David Klein
Article

Abstract

Drop-in centers offer a range of services to assist unaccompanied youth experiencing homelessness, but little is known about their perceptions of drop-in centers or use of different services. A random sample of 273 youth experiencing homelessness in the Los Angeles area who had ever used a drop-in center was surveyed. Most youth heard about local drop-in centers from peers (65.1%). They generally reported positive perceptions of the drop-in center environment, staff, and clients; overall, 57.8% were “very” or “extremely” satisfied with the services they had received. Nearly all youth cited basic services (e.g., food, showers, clothes) as a reason they went to drop-in centers; far fewer reported going to obtain higher-level services (e.g., case management). Perceptions and utilization did not differ by sexual orientation; however, non-white youth were more likely than Whites to use drop-in centers for certain higher-level services. Strategies for engaging youth in drop-in center services are discussed.

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by NIH/NIDA grant no. R21DA039076.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Robertson M. Homeless youth. In: Levison D, ed. Encyclopedia of homelessness. Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henry M, Watt R, Rosenthal L, et al. The 2017 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress: Part 1, Point in Time Estimates. Washington D.C. 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. 2017 Los Angeles County Homeless Count. Los Angeles, CA: LAHSA; 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shillington AM, Bousman CA, Clapp JD. Characteristics of homeless youth attending two different youth drop-in centers. Youth & Society. 2011;43(1):28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pedersen ER, Tucker JS, Kovalchik SA. Facilitators and barriers of drop-in center use among homeless youth. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016;59(2):144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Rosa CJ, Montgomery SB, Kipke MD, et al. Service utilization among homeless and runaway youth in Los Angeles, California: Rates and reasons. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1999;24(3):190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kort-Butler LA, Tyler KA. A cluster analysis of service utilization and incarceration among homeless youth. Social Science Research. 2012;41(3):612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pergamit MR, Ernst M, Hall C. Runaway youth’s knowledge and access of services. http://www.1800runaway.org/media/documents/NORC_Final_Report_4_22_10.pdf. National Runaway Switchboard, Chicago IL. 2010.
  9. 9.
    Slesnick N, Kang MJ, Bonomi AE, et al. Six-and twelve-month outcomes among homeless youth accessing therapy and case management services through an urban drop-in center. Health Services Research. 2008;43(1):211–229.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slesnick N, Feng X, Guo X, et al. A test of outreach and drop-in linkage versus shelter linkage for connecting homeless youth to services. Prevention Science. 2016;17(4):450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bantchevska D, Erdem G, Patton R, et al. Predictors of drop-in center attendance among substance-abusing homeless adolescents. Social Work Research. 2011;35(1):58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corliss HL, Goodenow CS, Nichols L, et al. High burden of homelessness among sexual-minority adolescents: findings from a representative Massachusetts high school sample. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101(9):1683–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Durso LE, Gates GJ. Serving Our Youth: Findings from a National Survey of Service Providers Working with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth who are Homeless or At Risk of Becoming Homeless. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute with True Colors Fund and The Palette Fund. 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cochran BN, Stewart AJ, Ginzler JA, et al. Challenges faced by homeless sexual minorities: Comparison of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender homeless adolescents with their heterosexual counterparts. American Journal of Public Health. 2002;92(5):773–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hohman M, Shillington AM, Min JW, et al. Adolescent use of two types of HIV prevention agencies. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention in Children & Youth. 2008;9(2):175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gattis MN. Psychosocial problems associated with homelessness in sexual minority youths. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2009;19(8):1066–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kattari SK, Barman-Adhikari A, DeChants J, et al. Social networks and sexual risk factor differences between cisgender heterosexual and cisgender LGBQ homeless youths. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services. 2017;29(2):182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abramovich A. Preventing, reducing and ending LGBTQ2S youth homelessness: The need for targeted strategies. Social Inclusion. 2016;4:86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tyler KA, Akinyemi SL, Kort-Butler LA. Correlates of service utilization among homeless youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34(7):1344–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter GR. From exclusion to destitution: race, affordable housing, and homelessness. Cityscape. 2011:33–70.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Culhane DP, Metraux S. Assessing relative risk for homeless shelter usage in New York City and Philadelphia. Population Research and Policy Review. 1999;18(3):219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Institute of Medicine. Committee on Health Care for Homeless P. Homelessness, Health, and Human Needs. National Academies; 1988.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee BA, Tyler KA, Wright JD. The new homelessness revisited. Annual Review of Sociology. 2010;36:501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pennbridge JN, Yates GL, David TG, et al. Runaway and homeless youth in Los Angeles county, California. Journal of Adolescent Health Care. 1990;11(2):159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ober AJ, Martino SC, Ewing B, et al. If you provide the test, they will take it: Factors associated with HIV/STI testing in a representative sample of homeless youth in Los Angeles. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2012;24(4):350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Comparing White and African American Homeless Youth in San Francisco: Research Findings and Policy Implications. California Homeless Youth Project. October 2012. http://cahomelessyouth.library.ca.gov/docs/pdf/76146-compare-wa-brief-report.pdf Accessed March 20, 2018.
  27. 27.
    Golinelli D, Tucker JS, Ryan GW, et al. Strategies for obtaining probability samples of homeless youth. Field Methods. 2015;27(2):131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heinze HJ, Jozefowicz DMH, Toro PA. Taking the youth perspective: Assessment of program characteristics that promote positive development in homeless and at-risk youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2010;32(10):1365–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chowdhury S, Khare M, Wolter K. Weight trimming in the national immunization survey. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association. 2007.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Potter F, Zheng Y. Methods and Issues in Trimming Extreme Weights in Sample Surveys. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods. 2015.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Connolly JA, Joly LE. Outreach with street-involved youth: A quantitative and qualitative review of the literature. Clinical psychology review. 2012;32(6):524–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harper GW, Carver LJ. “Out-of-the-mainstream” youth as partners in collaborative research: exploring the benefits and challenges. Health Education & Behavior. 1999;26(2):250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kelly K, Caputo T. Health and street/homeless youth. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(5):726–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rabinovitz S, Desai M, Schneir A, et al. No way home: Understanding the needs and experiences of homeless youth in Hollywood. Los Angeles, CA: Hollywood Homeless Youth Partnership; 2010.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tucker JS, Ryan GW, Golinelli D, et al. Substance Use and Other Risk Factors for Unprotected Sex: Results from an Event-Based Study of Homeless Youth. Aids Behav. 2012;16(6):1699–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tyler KA, Melander LA. Child abuse, street victimization, and substance use among homeless young adults. Youth Soc. 2015;47(4):502–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bender K, Brown SM, Thompson SJ, et al. Multiple victimizations before and after leaving home associated with PTSD, depression, and substance use disorder among homeless youth. Child Maltreatment. 2015;20(2):115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pedersen ER, Tucker JS, Klein DJ, et al. Perceived need and receipt of behavioral health services at drop-in centers among homeless youth. Health Services Research. 2018; in press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abramovich IA. No safe place to go-LGBTQ youth homelessness in Canada: Reviewing the literature. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth/Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse. 2012;4(1):29–51.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Flores AR. National trends in public opinion on LGBT rights in the United States. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. 2014.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Page M. Forgotten Youth: Homeless LGBT Youth of Color and the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act. Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy. 2017;12(2).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Racial Discrimination in Housing and Homelessness in the United States: A Report to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty and Los Angeles Community Action Network. 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection  2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RAND CorporationSanta MonicaUSA

Personalised recommendations