pp 1–4 | Cite as

Revisiting Harmless Discrimination

  • Tom ParrEmail author


In a co-authored piece with Adam Slavny, I argued that any promising account of the wrongness of discrimination must focus not only on the harmful outcomes of discriminatory acts but also on the deliberation of the discriminator and in particular on the reasons that motivate or fail to motivate her action. In this brief paper, I defend this conclusion against an objection that has recently been pressed against our view by Richard Arneson. This task is important not only because Arneson’s objection is an intriguing one, but also -- and more importantly -- because my response sheds further light on the content and structure of an attractive theory of wrongful discrimination, as well as on more fundamental ideas in moral philosophy.


Discrimination Harm Richard Arneson Intentions 



For helpful discussions about the ideas that appear in this paper, I thank Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Adam Slavny, and Victor Tadros. I also thank the British Academy for a Small Research Grant (SG162565) that supported this research.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations