Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 1227–1245 | Cite as

Dramatizing The SUBJECT’S Identity

  • Mercedes Rivero-ObraEmail author
Article
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

One of major branches of philosophical research is the self, which, in particular, tries to find out how a subject creates her identity. In this work, I will just focus on two kinds of identity approaches: the narrative self-concept and the dramatic self-concept. I will argue that, although the Narrative identity approach especially helpful for the subject being able to give continuity to her actions, the Dramatic identity is which achieves to give meaning to the subject’s actions as soon as they are happened, and also to herself. Hence, although both approaches might be useful for the self-concept of a subject because maintain a bidirectional relationship, it is the Dramatic identity theory which manages to resolve certain problems facing Narrative identity theory. To explain this, I will claim that agent is dramatized herself by acting in different situations. Following Erving Goffman and J. David Velleman, what it is posed in this essay is that the subject develops a Dramatic identity, in a similar way to the performer who represents her character, when she enacts herself in concrete contexts. That is, the agent dramatizes herself in a situation in a manner similar as an actor represents a character on stage. Consequently, my main goal is to answer to how an agent makes her identity by acting (and trying to give meaning to her behavior) in social contexts.

Keywords

Narrative identity Dramatic identity Embodiment Action Intelligibility 

References

  1. Brandon, P. (2016). Body and self: An entangled narrative. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dennett, D. (1992). The self as a center of narrative gravity. In P. M. Cole, F. S. Kessel, & D. J. Johnson (Eds.), Self and consciousness. Multiple perspectives (pp. 103–115). New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Dunlop, W. L. (2017). The narrative identity structure model. Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 37(2), 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edimburgh: University of Edimburgh.Google Scholar
  6. Goldie, P. (2000). The emotions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goldie, P. (2004). On personality. Thinking in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Goldie, P. (2012). The mess inside: Narrative, emotion, and the mind. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grysman, A., & Denney, A. (2017). Gender, experimenter gender and medium of report influence the content of autobiographical memory report. Memory, 25, 132–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrelson, K. J. (2016). Narrative identity and diachronic self-knowledge. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(1), 164–179.Google Scholar
  11. Hethmon, R. H. (1965). Strasberg at the actors studio: Tape-recorded sessions. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch, F. (2002). A method to their madness. The history of the actors studio. United States of America: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jongepier, F. (2016). Towards a constitutive account of implicit narrativity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackenzie, C. (2009). Personal identity, narrative integration, and embodiment. In Campbell, S., L. Meynell, L., & Sherwin, S. (Eds.), Embodiment and agency (pp. 100–125). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mackenzie, C. (2014). Embodied agents, narrative selves. Philosophical Explorations, 17(2), 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCoy, T. P., & Dunlop, W. L. (2016). Contextualizing narrative identity: A consider- ation of assessment settings. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLean, K. C. (2015). The co-authored self: Family stories and the construction of personal identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Pals, J. L. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menary, R. (2008). Embodied narratives. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(6), 63–84.Google Scholar
  21. Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rivero-Obra, M. (2016). La dramatización del sujeto como construcción del proceso agencial. La analogía del actor en J. David Velleman (The subject’s dramatization as agency process-building. The performer analogy by J. David Velleman). Doctoral dissertation, Carlos III University of Madrid.Google Scholar
  23. Schechtman, M. (1996). The constitution of selves. In Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schechtman, M. (2007). Stories, lives, and basic survival: A refinement and defense of the narrative view. In D. Hutto (Ed.), Narrative and understanding persons (pp. 155–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanislavski, K. (1989). An actor prepares. New York: Roudedge - Theatre Arts Books.Google Scholar
  26. Strawson, G. (2004). Against Narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Velleman, J. D. (2006). Self to self. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Velleman, J. D. (2009). How we get along. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wood, D. (1991). Life in Quest of Narrative. In On Paul Ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 20–33). London, New York: Routledge, volume: Warwick studies in philosophy and literature.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities: Philosophy, Language and Literature TheoryCarlos III University of Madrid (UC3M)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations