Advertisement

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 111–132 | Cite as

Voluntary contributions in a system with uncertain returns: a case of systemic risk

  • Annarita ColasanteEmail author
  • Aurora García-Gallego
  • Nikolaos Georgantzis
  • Andrea Morone
Regular Article

Abstract

This paper investigates systemic risk that emerges from the interplay between uncertain returns to individual actions, uncertainty on others’ behavior and all this filtered through individual attitudes toward risk. We design a finitely repeated linear public good experiment based on a voluntary contribution mechanism and analyze the effect of risky and uncertain returns on subjects’ contributions. Results from a baseline treatment without uncertainty are compared with two risky treatments characterized by different values for the marginal per capita return. In the treatments with risk, subjects are randomly assigned to one out of three feasible marginal per capita returns, independently of what their individual contribution was. Results show that a sufficient level of uncertainty leads to significantly lower individual contributions. Furthermore, in a system with lower contributions due to uncertainty, subjects’ risk aversion enhances the systemic risk, leading the system to collapse.

Keywords

Uncertainty Systemic risk Exogenous risk Public good game Experiment 

JEL Classification

D84 E37 G12 

Notes

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. Am Econ Rev 105(2):564–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni J (1988) Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public good experiments. J Public Econ 37:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoni J, Croson R (2008) Partners versus strangers random rematching in public goods experiments. In: Plott C, Smith VL (eds) Handbook of experimental economics results. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 776–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Au W (2004) Criticality and environmental uncertainty in step-level public goods dilemmas. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 8(1):40–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barreda-Tarrazona I, García-Gallego A, Georgantzis N, Ziros N (2018) Market games as social dilemmas. J Econ Behav Organ 155:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berardi S, Tedeschi G (2017) From banks’ strategies to financial (in)stability. Int Rev Econ Finance 47:255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulu-Reshef B, Brott SH, Zylbersztejn A (2017) Does uncertainty deter provision of public goods? Revue Économique 5:16–23Google Scholar
  8. Brekke KA, Hauge KE, Thori LJ, Nyborg K (2011) Playing with the good guys. A public good game with endogenous group formation. J Public Econ 95.9–10:1111–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budescu DV, Rapoport A, Suleiman R (1990) Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. Eur J Soc Psychol 20(6):475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp Econ 14:47–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colasante A, Russo A (2017) Voting for the distribution rule in a public good game with heterogeneous endowments. J Econ Interact Coord 12(3):443–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickinson DL (1998) The voluntary contributions mechanism with uncertain group payoffs. J Econ Behav Organ 35(4):517–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doerrenberg P (2015) Does the use of tax revenue matter for tax compliance behavior? Econ Lett 128:30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugar S (2013) Non-monetary incentives and opportunistic behavior: evidence from a laboratory public good game. Econ Inq 51(2):1374–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2):171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 100(1):541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71(3):397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischbacher U, Schudy S, Teyssier S (2014) Heterogeneous reactions to heterogeneity in returns from public goods. Soc Choice Welf 43(1):195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freixas X, Parigi BM, Rochet J-C (2000) Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. J Money Credit Bank 32(3):611–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. García-Gallego A, Georgantzís N, Jaramillo-Gutiérrez A, Parravano M (2012) The lottery-panel task for bi-dimensional parameter-free elicitation of risk attitudes. Revista Internacional de Sociología 70(1):53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isaac RM, Walker JM, Thomas SH (1984) Divergent evidence on free riding: an experimental examination of possible explanations. Public Choice 43(2):113–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufman GG, Scott KE (2003) What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? Indep Rev 7(3):371–391Google Scholar
  25. Levati MV, Morone A (2013) Voluntary contributions with risky and uncertain marginal returns: the importance of the parameter values. J Public Econ Theory 15(5):736–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levati MV, Morone A, Fiore A (2009) Voluntary contributions with imperfect information: an experimental study. Public Choice 138(1):199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Listokin Y, Schizer DM (2013) I like to pay taxes: Taxpayer support for governemt spending and the efficiency of the tax system. Tax Law Rev 66:179Google Scholar
  28. Masciandaro D, Passarelli F (2013) Financial systemic risk: Taxation or regulation? J Bank Finance 37(2):587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messick DM, Allison ST, Samuelson CD (1988) Framing and communication effects on group members’ responses to environmental and social uncertainty. Appl Behav Econ 2:677–700Google Scholar
  30. Milinski M, Sommerfeld RD, Krambech H-J, Reed FA, Marotzke J (2008) The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(7):2291–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morone A, Temerario T (2018) Is dyads’ behaviour conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. J Behav Exp Econ 73:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neugebauer T, Perote J, Schmidt U, Loos M (2009) Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: on the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments. J Econ Psychol 30(1):52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ozdemir O, Morone A (2014) An experimental investigation of insurance decisions in low probability and high loss risk situations. J Econ Interact Coord 9(1):53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Recchioni MC, Tedeschi G (2017) From bond yield to macroeconomic instability: a parsimonious affine model. Eur J Oper Res 262(3):1116–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sabater-Grande G, Georgantzis N (2002) Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’ dilemma games: an experimental test. J Econ Behav Organ 48(1):37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarcz SL (2008) Systemic risk. Georget Law J 97:193–249Google Scholar
  37. Teyssier S (2012) Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games. Public Choice 151(1):91–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wit A, Wilke H (1998) Public good provision under environmental and social uncertainty. Eur J Soc Psychol 28(2):249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annarita Colasante
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aurora García-Gallego
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Georgantzis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrea Morone
    • 3
  1. 1.LEE and Department of EconomicsUniversitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain
  2. 2.CEREN EA 7477, Burgundy School of BusinessUniversité Bourgogne Franche-ComtéDijonFrance
  3. 3.Dpto. di Economia, Management e Diritto d’ImpresaUniversità degli Studi di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations