Advertisement

Dissecting the myth of the house price in Chinese metropolises: allowing for behavioral heterogeneity among investors

  • Ling Zhang
  • Wenlong Bian
  • Hao ZhangEmail author
Regular Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to demystify the housing boom in Chinese metropolises by allowing for behavioral heterogeneity among investors. We construct an agent-based model where investors are categorized into two groups: fundamentalists and chartists. In addition, the investment strategy switching is allowed between these two groups contingent on the historical performance. Using the data of five Chinese metropolises over the period 2008–2014, the results suggest that chartists dominate the housing market and make the house price maintain an upward trend, while fundamentalists play a stabilizing role. Specifically, fundamentalists can serve as a “price anchor” in the market, because the proportion of the fundamentalists is negatively associated with both the growth rate of the house price and the deviation relative to the fundamental value. Overall, the impact of the chartists on the house price is much greater than that of the fundamentalists, which contributes to the ever-increasing house price in Chinese metropolises.

Keywords

Behavioral heterogeneity House price Investment strategy switching 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71603061, 71601055, 71721001, 71971070), the Philosophy and Social Science Programming Foundation of Guangzhou (Project No. 2018GZYB56), and the Fund Projects of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies and the Foundation of South China Institute of Fortune Management Research.

References

  1. Bao T, Hommes C (2015) When speculators meet constructors: positive and negative feedback in experimental housing markets. SOM Research ReportsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolt W, Demertzis D, Diks CGH, van der Leij MJ (2014) Identifying Booms and Busts in House Prices Under Heterogeneous Expectations. DNB Working Paper, No. 450Google Scholar
  3. Brock WA, Hommes C (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65(5):1059–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock WA, Hommes C (1998) Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. J Econ Dyn Control 22(8–9):1235–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case KE, Shiller RJ (2003) Is there a bubble in the housing market? Brook Pap Econ Act 2:299–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiarella C (1992) The dynamics of speculative behaviour. Ann Oper Res 37(1):101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day RH, Huang W (1990) Bulls, bears and market sheep. J Econ Behav Organ 14(3):299–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dieci R, Westerhoff F (2012) A simple model of a speculative housing market. J Evolut Econ 22(2):303–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dieci R, Westerhoff F (2013) Modeling house price dynamics with heterogeneous speculators. In: Bischi GI et al (eds) Global analysis of dynamic models in economics and finance. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dieci R, Westerhoff F (2016) Heterogeneous expectations, boom-bust housing cycles, and supply conditions: a nonlinear economic dynamics approach. J Econ Dyn Control 71:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diks C, Wang J (2016) Can a stochastic cusp catastrophe model explain housing market crashes? J Econ Dyn Control 69:68–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farlow A (2004) The UK housing market: bubbles and buyers. Paper presented at the Credit Suisse First Boston housing market conferenceGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetzmann WN (1993) The single family home in the investment portfolio. J Real Estate Finance Econ 6(3):201–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hommes C (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. Handb Comput Econ 2(5-056/1):1109–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hommes C (2013) Reflexivity, expectations feedback and almost self-fulfilling equilibria: economic theory, empirical evidence and laboratory experiments. J Econ Methodol 20(4):406–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hott C, Monnin P (2008) Fundamental real estate prices: an empirical estimation with international data. J Real Estate Finance Econ 36(4):427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kouwenberg R, Zwinkels RCJ (2011) Chasing trends in the U.S. housing market. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1539475
  18. Kouwenberg R, Zwinkels RCJ (2014) Forecasting the U.S. housing market. Int J Forecast 30:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kouwenberg R, Zwinkels RCJ (2015) Endogenous price bubbles in a multi-agent system of the housing market. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129070 Google Scholar
  20. Kullmann C, Siegel S (2003) Real estate and its role in household portfolio choice. EFA 2003 annual conference paper, no. 918Google Scholar
  21. Lux T (1998) The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of returns distributions. J Econ Behav Organ 33(2):143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lux T, Marchesi M (2000) Volatility clustering in financial markets: a micro-simulation of interacting agents. Int J Theor Appl Finance 3(4):675–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pagan A (1996) The econometrics of financial markets. J Empir Finance 3(1):15–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quigley JM (1999) Real estate prices and economic cycles. Int Real Estate Rev 2(1):1–20Google Scholar
  25. Shiller R (2005) Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Shiller R (2008) The subprime solution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Sommervoll DE, Borgersen TA, Wennemo T (2010) Endogenous housing market cycles. J Bank Finance 34(3):557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeeman EC (1974) On the unstable behavior of stock exchanges. J Math Econ 1(1):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang H, Huang Y, Yao H (2016) Heterogeneous expectation, beliefs evolution and house price volatility. Econ Model 53(2):409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Financial Engineering and Risk Management, School of InsuranceGuangdong University of FinanceGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Graduate School of ChinaSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.School of FinanceGuangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Southern China Institute of Fortune Management ResearchGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations