Advertisement

Modeling the impulse response complex network for studying the fluctuation transmission of price indices

  • Qingru Sun
  • Xiangyun Gao
  • Shaobo Wen
  • Sida Feng
  • Ze Wang
Regular Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

We provide a method for analyzing the transmission of fluctuation among price indices, which combines the complex network method and the impulse response function (IRF). The transmission relationships of price fluctuation among numerous price indices are remarkably complicated, especially under external shocks. In this paper, the empirical data of US, China and Japan are selected as samples, and we analyze the transmission relationships between each two price indices using IRF and construct directed positive and negative impulse response networks of US, China and Japan, respectively. We analyze and compare the price fluctuation transmission characteristics of different countries under external shocks from the aspect of the transmission range, degree, intermediary, clustering and time. The results of the analysis indicate that (1) Positive networks are tighter than negative networks; (2) There is positive correlation between the range and degree of price fluctuation transmission; (3) The intermediation ability of price fluctuation transmission is high; (4) The clustering of networks is different and the transmission probability among clusters are different; (5) The transmission speed of positive networks is faster than that of negative networks. This research could provide some implications for investors in relation to decentralizing investments.

Keywords

Econophysics Complex network Impulse response function Fluctuation transmission Price index 

JEL Classification

C3 D85 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences planning funds project under the Ministry of Education of the PRC (Grant No. 17YJCZH047), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 9174041), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41871202) and the fund from Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources (Grant No. CCA2017.11).

Supplementary material

11403_2018_231_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 34 kb)

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80:1977–2016.  https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta9623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar AE, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2015) Microeconomic origins of macroeconomic tail risks. In: Meeting PapersGoogle Scholar
  3. Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Kerr W (2016) Networks and the macroeconomy: an empirical exploration NBER. Macroecon Ann 30:52Google Scholar
  4. Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2014) Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and economic policy uncertainty. Energy Econ 44:433–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balke NS, Wynne MA (2007) The relative price effects of monetary shocks. J Macroecon 29:19–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2005.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardoscia M, Livan G, Marsili M (2017) Statistical mechanics of complex economies. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aa6688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berec V (2017) Complexity and dynamics of topological and community structure in complex networks. Eur Phys J-Spec Top 226:2205–2218.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2016-60398-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep-Rev Sect Phys Lett 424:175–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannas B, Cincotti S, Marchesi M, Pilo F (2001) Learning of Chua’s circuit attractors by locally recurrent neural networks. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 12:2109–2115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-0779(00)00174-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho VM (2014) From micro to macro via production networks. J Econ Perspect 28:23–48.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djauhari MA, Gan SL (2016) Network topology of economic sectors. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp 2016:093401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagiolo G, Squartini T, Garlaschelli D (2013) Null models of economic networks: the case of the world trade web. J Econ Interact Coord 8:75–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0104-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez V (2014) Linear and non-linear causality between price indices and commodity prices. Resour Policy 41:40–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabaix X (2011) The granular origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 79:733–772.  https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta8769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gan SL, Djauhari MA (2015) New York stock exchange performance: evidence from the forest of multidimensional minimum spanning trees. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2015/12/p12005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao XY, An HZ, Zhong WQ (2013) Features of the correlation structure of price indices. PLoS ONE 8:9.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao XY, An HZ, Fang W, Huang X, Li HJ, Zhong WQ, Ding YH (2014) Transmission of linear regression patterns between time series: from relationship in time series to complex networks. Phys Rev E 90:012818.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao YC, Zeng Y, Cai SM (2015) Influence network in the Chinese stock market. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2015/03/p03017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao ZK, Yang YX, Zhai LS, Jin ND, Chen GR (2016) A Four-sector conductance method for measuring and characterizing low-velocity oil–water two-phase flows. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 65:1690–1697.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2016.2540862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. García-Germán S, Bardají I, Garrido A (2015) Evaluating price transmission between global agricultural markets and consumer food price indices in the European Union. Agric Econ 47:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo XP, Shi JX, Ren DF (2016) Coal price forecasting and structural analysis in China. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1256168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson MO (2014) Networks in the understanding of economic behaviors. J Econ Perspect 28:3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Konstantakis KN, Michaelides PG, Tsionas EG, Minou C (2015) System estimation of GVAR with two dominants and network theory: evidence for BRICs. Econ Model 51:604–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahmiri S (2017) Cointegration and causal linkages in fertilizer markets across different regimes. Phys A 471:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenzu S, Tedeschi G (2012) Systemic risk on different interbank network topologies. Phys A 391:4331–4341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman MEJ (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70:056131.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reza R, Tularam GA, Li B (2017) An investigation into the interdependence of global water indices: a VAR analysis. Appl Econ 49:769–796.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1205725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shahbaz M, Wahid ANM, Haider A (2010) Empirical psychology between wholesale price and consumer price indices: the case of Pakistan. Singap Econ Rev 55:537–551.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217590810003882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma SS (2016) Can consumer price index predict gold price returns? Econ Model 55:269–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Song ML, Wang JL (2016) Coal price fluctuations in China: economic effects and policy implications. J Renew Sustain Energy 8:14.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiwari AK (2012) An empirical investigation of causality between producers’ price and consumers’ price indices in Australia in frequency domain. Econ Model 29:1571–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiwari AK, Mutascu M, Andries AM (2013) Decomposing time-frequency relationship between producer price and consumer price indices in Romania through wavelet analysis. Econ Model 31:151–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiwari AK, Suresh KG, Arouri M, Teulon F (2014) Causality between consumer price and producer price: evidence from Mexico. Econ Model 36:432–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsekeris T (2017) Network analysis of inter-sectoral relationships and key sectors in the Greek economy. J Econ Interact Coord 12:413–435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-015-0171-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tu CY (2014) Cointegration-based financial networks study in Chinese stock market. Phys A 402:245–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vyrost T, Lyocsa S, Baumohl E (2015) Granger causality stock market networks: temporal proximity and preferential attachment. Phys A 427:262–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang GJ, Xie C, Chen S (2017a) Multiscale correlation networks analysis of the US stock market: a wavelet analysis. J Econ Interact Coord 12:561–594.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-016-0176-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang S, Liu J, Wang XD (2017b) Mitigation of attacks and errors on community structure in complex networks. J Stat Mech-Theory Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aa6581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao J, Wang M, Tian L, Zhen Z (2018) The measurement of China’s consumer market development based on CPI data. Phys A 490:561–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang CX, Chen YH, Niu L, Li Q (2014) Cointegration analysis and influence rank—a network approach to global stock markets. Phys A 400:168–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and EnvironmentMinistry of Natural ResourcesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations