Advertisement

Short-term impact of spent coffee grounds over soil organic matter composition and stability in two contrasted Mediterranean agricultural soils

  • Francisco Comino
  • Ana Cervera-MataEmail author
  • Victor Aranda
  • Juan Manuel Martín-García
  • Gabriel Delgado
Soils, Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Spent coffee grounds (SCG) is a biowaste which arouse great interest as soil organic amendment due to the huge amount produced around the world. However, the impact of this residue on soil organic matter (SOM) functionality and stability has been barely studied. Thus, the aim of this work is to study the short-term effects of SCG on the quantity and quality of SOM in two Mediterranean agricultural soils (Vega soil, SV and Red soil, SR) in microcosm conditions.

Materials and methods

The in vitro assay was performed with two fresh SCG doses (2.5 and 10% w/w), two incubation times (30 and 60 days) and two agricultural soils (SV and SR). SOM fractionation to obtain total extractable carbon, humic acids, fulvic acids, humins and hot water soluble carbon (HWSC) was determined. Spectroscopic UV-Vis and Mid-IR, thermogravimetric and simultaneous differential thermal analysis, as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), were also applied in this study.

Results and discussion

SCG increased all SOM fractions, especially the levels of more labile SOM (HWSC, increased 600–700%) and total extractable carbon (increased to around 200%). SCG also increased humic acids and fulvic acids around 200%, but the functionality of humic acids was affected by a reduction of the functional groups with more recalcitrant and stable character. The tested soils are different from each other (the SV has a more clayish texture and a higher smectite clay content than the SR) which made the behaviour of these soils different. The degree of incorporation of SCG into the soils structure and the interaction between soil and SCG particles (observed by SEM) affected carbon retention under stable forms, increasing carbon stabilization in SV with respect to SR.

Conclusions

The short-term effect of SCG on SOM composition and functionality demonstrate that this bioresidue could be used as soil organic amendment, being a valuable alternative use of a polluting waste. Soil type is a key factor since it influences the soil-SCG interaction and consequently SOM stability. To deepen the study of those effects, it would be necessary to analyze the long-term effects, field studies and to test in a greater number of soil types.

Keywords

Carbon stock Organic amendment Soil improvement Waste revalorization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

F. Comino thanks the Universidad de Jaén (Spain) for his Ph.D. fellowship.

Funding information

This work was supported by project AGL2014-53895-R from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). PAIDI funded the research groups RNM-127 and FQM-363. Technical support was provided by the Universidad de Jaén and Scientific-Technical Instrumentation Center (Funding by Universidad de Jaén, MINECO, Junta de Andalucía and FEDER).

Compliance with ethical statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Almendros G, Zancada MC, Pardo MT (2005) Land use and soil carbon accumulation patterns in South African savanna ecosystems. Biol Fertil Soils 41:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aranda V, Ayora M, Domínguez A, Martín J, Calero J, Delgado R, Verdejo T, González-Vila FJ (2011) Effect of soli type and management (organic vs. conventional) on soil organic matter quality in olive groves in a semi-arid environment in Sierra Mágina Natural Park (S Spain). Geoderma 164:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aranda V, Macci C, Peruzzi E, Masciandaro G (2015) Biochemical activity and chemical-structural properties of soil organic matter after 17 years of amendments with olive-mill pomace co-compost. J Environ Manag 147:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO (2000) Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Org Geochem 31:697–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballesteros LF, Teixeira JA, Mussatto SI (2014) Chemical, functional, and structural properties of spent coffee grounds and coffee silver skin. Food Bioprocess Technol 7:3493–3503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buurman P, Nierop KGJ, Kaal J, Senesi N (2009) Analytical pyrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation of EUROSOIL humic acid samples - a key to their source. Geoderma 150:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cervera-Mata A, Pastoriza S, Rufián-Henares JÁ, Martín-García JM, Delgado G (2017) Impact of spent coffee grounds as organic amendment on soil fertility and lettuce growth in two Mediterranean agricultural soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64(6):790–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cervera-Mata A, Martín-García JM, Delgado R, Párraga J, Sánchez-Marañón M, Delgado G (2019) Short-term effects of spent coffee grounds on physical properties of two Mediterranean agricultural soils. Int Agrophys 33(2):205–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen W, Lu K, Tsai C (2012) An experimental analysis on property and structure variations of agricultural wastes undergoing torrefaction. Appl Energy 100:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comino F, Aranda V, Domínguez-Vidal A, Ayora-Cañada MJ (2017) Thermal destruction of organic waste hydrophobicity for agricultural soils application. J Environ Manag 202:94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ćosović B, Vojvodić V, Bošković N, Plavšić M, Lee C (2010) Characterization of natural and synthetic humic substances (melanoidins) by chemical composition and adsorption measurements. Org Geochem 41:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig AP, Franca AS, Oliveira LS (2012) Discrimination between defective and non-defective roasted coffees by diffuse reflectance infrared Fouriertransform spectroscopy. LWT Food Sci Technol 47:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding G, Novak JM, Amarasiriwardena D, Hunt PG, Xing B (2002) Soil organic matter characteristics as affected by tillage management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumroese RK, Monteville ME, Pinto JR (2015) Using container weights to determine irrigation needs: a simple method. Nativ Plants J 16:67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng W, Plante AF, Six J (2013) Improving estimates of maximal organic carbon stabilization by fine soil particles. Biogeochemistry 112:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Ruiz R, Ochoa MV, Hinojosa MB, Gómez Muñoz B (2012) Improved soil quality after 16 years of olive mill pomace application in olive oil groves. Agron Sustain Dev 32:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghani A, Dexter M, Perrott KW (2003) Hot-water extractable carbon in soils : a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilisation , grazing and cultivation. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1231–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hachicha R, Rekik O, Hachicha S, Ferchichi M, Woodward S, Moncef N, Cegarra J, Mechichi T (2012) Chemosphere co-composting of spent coffee ground with olive mill wastewater sludge and poultry manure and effect of Trametesversicolor inoculation on the compost maturity. Chemosphere 88:677–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardgrove SJ, Livesley SJ (2016) Applying spent coffee grounds directly to urban agriculture soils greatly reduces plant growth. Urban For Urban Green 18:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes MHB, Mylote S, Swift RS (2017) Humin: its composition and importance in soil organic matter. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in Agronomy, vol 143. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 47–138Google Scholar
  21. IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Strezov V, Kan T (2014) Energy recovery potential analysis of spent coffee grounds pyrolysis products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez-Capel E, Sohi SP, Gaunt JL, Manning DAC (2005) Use of thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry to characterize modelable soil organic matter fractions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 140:136–140Google Scholar
  24. Madari BE, Reeves JB, Machado PLOA, Guimarães CM, Torres E, McCarty GW (2006) Mid- and near-infrared spectroscopic assessment of soil compositional parameters and structural indices in two Ferralsols. Geoderma 136:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martín-García JM, Delgado G, Párraga JF, Gámiz E, Delgado R (1999) Chemical, mineralogical and (micro) morphological study of coarse fragments in Mediterranean red soils. Geoderma 90:23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mikutta R, Kleber M, Torn MS, Jahn R (2006) Stabilization of soil organic matter: association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance? Biogeochemistry 77:25–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mingorance MD, Barahona E, Fernández-Gálvez J (2007) Guidelines for improving organic carbon recovery by the wet oxidation method. Chemosphere 68:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murthy PS, Madhava Naidu M (2012) Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 66:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mussatto SI, Machado EMS, Martins S, Teixeira JA (2011) Production, composition, and application of coffee and its industrial residues. Food Bioprocess Technol 4:661–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlova N, Abakumov E, Orlova E et al (2019) Soil organic matter alteration under biochar amendment: study in the incubation experiment on the Podzol soils of the Leningrad region (Russia). J Soils Sediments 19:2708–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez-Lomas AL, Delgado G, Párraga J, Delgado R, Almendros G, Aranda V (2010) Evolution of organic matter fractions after application of co-compost of sewage sludge with pruning waste to four Mediterranean agricultural soils. A soil microcosm experiment. Waste Manag 30:1957–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plante AF, Fernández JM, Leifeld J (2009) Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma 153:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rakhsh F, Golchin A, Beheshti Al Agha A, Alamdari P (2017) Effects of exchangeable cations, mineralogy and clay content on the mineralization of plant residue carbon. Geoderma 307:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reichstein M, Bahn M, Ciais P, Frank D, Mahecha MD, Seneviratne SI, Zscheischler J, Beer C, Buchmann N, Frank DC, Papale D, Rammig A, Smith P, Thonicke K, Van Der Velde M, Vicca S, Walz A, Wattenbach M (2013) Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodríguez Martín JA, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Gonzalo J, Gil C, Ramos-Miras JJ, Grau Corbí JM, Boluda R (2016) Assessment of the soil organic carbon stock in Spain. Geoderma 264:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rufián-Henares JA, de la Cueva SP (2009) Antimicrobial activity of coffee melanoidins-a study of their metal-chelating properties. J Agric Food Chem 57:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Senesi N, Plaza C (2007) Role of humification processes in recycling organic wastes of various nature and sources as soil amendments. Clean - Soil Air Water 35:26–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Senesi N, D’Orazio V, Ricca G (2003) Humic acids in the first generation of EUROSOILS. Geoderma 116:325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturatin of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soil Survey Staff (2014) Soil survey field and laboratory methods manual, soil survey investigations. Report No. 51, Version 2.0. R. Burt and Soil Survey Staff (ed.). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation ServiceGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry: genesis, composition, reactions, 2nd Editio. ed, Organic Geochemistry. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization (chap. 35). In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods. ASA/SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI, USA. Soil Sci Soc Am. Book Series, n° 5, pp 1018-1021Google Scholar
  43. Tatzber M, Mutsch F, Mentler A, Leitgeb E, Englisch M, Zehetner F, Djukic I, Gerzabek MH (2011) Mid-infrared spectroscopy for topsoil layer identification according to litter type and decompositional stage demonstrated on a large sample set of Austrian forest soils. Geoderma 166:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Traina SJ, Novak J, Smeck NE (1990) An ultraviolet absorbance method of estimating the percentage aromatic carbon content of humic acids. J Environ Qual 19:151–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vergnoux A, Guiliano M, Di Rocco R, Domeizel M, Théraulaz F, Doumenq P (2011) Quantitative and mid-infrared changes of humic substances from burned soils. Environ Res 111:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wattel-Koekkoek EJW, van Genuchten PPL, Buurman P, van Lagen B (2001) Amount and composition of clay-associated soil organic matter in a range of kaolinitic and smectitic soils. Geoderma 99:27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White KE, Reeves JB, Coale FJ (2011) Mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the rapid analysis of plant root composition. Geoderma. 167–168:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamane K, Kono M, Fukunaga T, Iwai K, Sekine R (2014) Field evaluation of coffee grounds application for crop growth enhancement, weed control, and soil improvement. Plant Prod Sci 17:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zarrinbakhsh N, Wang T, Rodriguez-Uribe A, Misra M, Mohant AK (2016) Characterization of wastes and coproducts from the coffee industry for composite material production. BioResources 11:7637–7653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zbytniewski R, Buszewski B (2005) Characterization of natural organic matter (NOM) derived from sewage sludge compost. Part 1: chemical and spectroscopic properties. Bioresour Technol 96:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang L, Sun X (2017) Using cow dung and spent coffee grounds to enhance the two-stage co- composting of green waste. Bioresour Technol 245:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical and Analytical ChemistryUniversidad de JaénAndalucíaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Facultad de FarmaciaUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Geology, Soil Science SectionUniversidad de JaénAndalucíaSpain

Personalised recommendations