Advertisement

A 3-year assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung of grazing sheep in a subtropical ecosystem

  • Diego Fernandes de Bastos
  • Emanuelle Cavazini Magiero
  • Michely Tomazi
  • Janquieli Schirmann
  • Murilo G. Veloso
  • Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho
  • Cimélio BayerEmail author
Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Grazing livestock has strong impact on global nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by providing N sources through excreta. The scarcity of information on factors influencing N2O emissions from sheep excreta in subtropical ecosystems such as those of Southern Brazil led us to conduct field trials in three different winter pasture seasons on an integrated crop–livestock system (ICL) in order to assess N2O emission factors (EF-N2O) in response to variable rates of urine and dung.

Materials and methods

The equivalent urine-N loading rates for the three winter seasons (2009, 2010, and 2013) ranged from 96 to 478 kg ha−1, and the dung-N rates applied in 2009 and 2010 were 81 and 76 kg ha−1, respectively. Air was sampled from closed static chambers (0.20 m in diameter) for approximately 40 days after excreta application and analyzed for N2O by gas chromatography.

Results and discussion

Soil N2O-N fluxes spanned the ranges 4 to 353 μg m−2 h−1 in 2009, − 47 to 976 μg m−2 h−1 in 2010, and 46 to 339 μg m−2 h−1 in 2013. Urine addition resulted in N2O-N peaks within for up to 20–30 days after application in the 3 years, and the strength of the peaks was linearly related to the N rate used. Emission factors of N2O (EF-N2O, % of N applied that is emitted as N2O) of urine ranged from 0.06 to 0.34% and were essentially independent of N rate applied. By considering a ratio of N excreted by urine and dung of 60:40, a single combined excretal EF-N2O of 0.14% was estimated.

Conclusions

Our findings showed higher mean EF-N2O for sheep urine than that for dung (0.21% vs 0.03%), irrespective of the occurrence or not of urine patches overlap. This value is much lower than default value of 1% of IPCC’s Tier 1 and reinforces the needs of its revision.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases Livestock Nitrous oxide Subtropical environment 

Notes

Funding information

This work was funded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Research Support Foundation of the Rio Grande do Sul state (FAPERGS).

References

  1. Barneze AS, Mazzetto AM, Zani CF, Misselbrook T, Cerri CC (2014) Nitrous oxide emissions from soil due to urine deposition by grazing cattle in Brazil. Atmos Environ 92:394–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayer C, Gomes J, Zanatta JA, Vieira FCB, Dieckow J (2016) Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical Ultisol by using long-term no-tillage in combination with legume cover crops. Soil Till. Res. 161, 86-94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnert DW, DelCurto T, Clark AA, Merrill ML, Falck SJ, Harmon DL (2011) Protein supplementation of ruminants consuming low-quality cool or warm-season forage: differences in intake and digestibility. J Anim Sci 89:3707–3717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremmer JM (1960) Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J Agric Sci 55:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter MS (2007) Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from urine patches. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2091–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carvalho JLN, Avanzi JC, Silva MLN, Mello CR, Cerri CEP (2010) Potencial de sequestro de carbono em diferentes biomas do Brasil. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 34:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chadwick DR, Cardenas LM, Dhanoa MS, Donovan N, Misselbrook T, Williams JR, Thorman RE, McGeough KL, Watson CJ, Bell M, Anthony SG (2018) The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories. Sci Total Environ 635:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clough TJ, Ledgard SF, Sprosen MS, Kear MJ (1998) Fate of 15N labelled urine on four soil types. Plant Soil 199:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Klein CA, Harvey MJ (2015) Nitrous oxide chamber methodology guidelines–version 1.1 Ministry for Primary Industries. 146 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. De Klein CAM, Sherlock RR, Cameron KC, Van Der Weerdent TJ (2001) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in New Zealand – a review of current knowledge and directions for future research. J R Soc N Z 31:543–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Klein CAM, Barton L, Sherlock RR, Li Z, Littlejhon RP (2003) Estimating a nitrous oxide emission factor for animal urine from some New Zealand pastoral soil. Aust J Soil Res 41:381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Firestone MK, Davidson EA (1989) Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. In: Andreae M O, Schimel D S. eds. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. John Wiley & Sons 1:7–21Google Scholar
  13. Gomes J, Bayer C, Costa FS, Piccolo MC, Zanatta JA, Vieira FCB, Six J (2009) Soil nitrous oxide emissions in long-term cover crops-based rotations under subtropical climate. Soil Tillage Res 106:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Adv Agron 49:119–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoekstra NJ, Lalor S, Richards KG, O’Hea N, Dungait J, Schulte RPO, Schmidt O (2011) The fate of slurry N fractions in herbage and soil during two growing seasons following application. Plant Soil 342:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyde B, Ryan M, Hawkins M, Connolly J, Carton OT (2005) Nitrous oxide emissions. In: End of project report RMIS 4974. Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford 1:0–26Google Scholar
  17. IBGE (2010) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo agropecuário, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2007). In: S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA [technical summary]Google Scholar
  19. IPCC (2013) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamali H, Quayle WC, Baldock J (2015) Reducing nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen leaching losses from irrigated arable cropping in Australia thorugh optimized irrigation scheduling. Agric For Meteorol 208:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvis SC, Hatch DJ, Roberts DH (1989) The effects of grassland management on nitrogen losses from grazed swards through ammonia volatilization; the relationship to excretal N returns from cattle. J Agric Sci 112:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koll DM, Dolfing J, Wrage N, Van Groenigen JW (2011) Nitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krol DJ, Carolan R, Minet E, McGeough KL, Watson CJ, Forrestal PJ, Lanigan GJ, Richards KG (2016) Improving and disaggregating N2O emission factors for ruminant excreta on temperate pasture soils. Sci Total Environ 568:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lessa ACR, Madari BE, Paredes DS, Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Jantalia CP, Alves BJR (2014) Bovine urine and dung deposited on Brazilian savannah pastures contribute differently to direct and indirect soil nitrous oxide emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo J, Tillman RW, Ball PR (1999) Factors regulating denitrification in a soil under pasture. Soil Biol Biochem 31:913–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo J, Lindsey SB, Ledgard SF (2008) Nitrous oxide emissions from animal urine application on a New Zealand pasture. Biol Fertil Soils 44:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luo J, Van Der Weerden T, Hoogendoorn C, De Klein C (2009) Determination of the N2O emission factor for animal dung applied in spring in three regions of New Zealand. Report for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGoogle Scholar
  28. MCTI, Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação (2014) Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil - 2ª edição. MCTI, Brasília, 168. Disponível em http://www.mct.gov.br
  29. MCTI, Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação (2016) Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil - 3ª edição. MCTI, Brasília, 168. Disponível em https://sirene.mctic.gov.br/portal/export/sites/sirene/backend/galeria/arquivos/2018/10/11/Estimativas_3ed.pdf
  30. Mosier AR (1989) Chamber and isotope techniques. In: Andreae MO, Schimel DS (eds) Exchange of traces gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere: report of the Dahlem Workshop. Wiley, Berlin, pp 175–187Google Scholar
  31. Mu Z, Kimura SD, Toma Y, Hatano R (2008) Nitrous oxide fluxes from upland soils in Central Hokkaido. J Environ Sci 20:1312–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oenema O, Velthof GL, Yamulki S, Jarvis SC (1997) Nitrous oxide emissions from grazed grassland. Soil Use Manag 13:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimentel LG, Weiler DA, Pedroso GM, Bayer C (2015) Soil N2O emissions following cover-crop residues application under two soil moisture conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 178:631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gagnon B, Bertrand N (2008) N2O fluxes in soils of contrasting textures fertilized with liquid and solid dairy cattle manures. Can J Soil Sci 88:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saggar S, Bolan NS, Bhandral R, Hedley CB, Luo JA (2004) Review of emissions of methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide from animal excreta deposition and farm effluent application in grazed pastures. New Zeal J Agr Res 47:513–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LCH, Oliveira VA, Oliveira JB, Coelho MR, Lumbreras JF, Cunha TJF, 2006. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 2ed. Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro. 306 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Selbie DR, Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL, Lanigan GJ, Richards KG (2014) The effect of urinary nitrogen loading rate and a nitrification inhibitor on nitrous oxide emissions from a temperate grassland soil. J Agric Sci 152:S159–S171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Selbie DR, Buckthought LE, Shepherd MA (2015) The challenge of the urine patch for managing nitrogen in grazed pasture systems. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic Press, London, pp 229–292Google Scholar
  39. Simon PL, Dieckow J, de Klein CAM, Zanatta JA, van der Weerden TJ, Ramalho B, Bayer C (2018) Nitrous oxide emission factors from cattle urine and dung, anddicyandiamide (DCD) as a mitigation strategy in subtropical pastures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 267:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie KE, Massheder J, Rey A (2003) Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. Eur J Soil Sci 54:779–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sordi A, Dieckow J, Bayer C, Albuquerque MA, Piva JT, Zanatta JA, Tomazi M, da Rosa CM, de Moraes A (2014) Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patches in subtropical Brazilian pastureland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 190:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Groenigen JW, Velthof GL, van der Bolt FJE, Vos A, Kuikman PJ (2005) Seasonal variation in N2O emissions from urine patches: effects of urine concentration, soil compaction and dung. Plant Soil 273:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams DL, Ineson P, Cowards PA (1999) Temporal variations in nitrous oxide fluxes from urine–affected grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 31:779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webb J and Misselbrook TH (2004) A mass-flow model of ammonia emissions from UK livestock production. Atmos. Environ. 38: 2163-2176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wrage N, Velthof GL, Van Beusichem ML (2001) Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1723–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wrage N, Van Groenigen JW, Oenema O, Baggs EM (2005) A novel dua-isotope labelling method for distinguishing between soil sources of N2O. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 19:3298–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yamulki S, Jarvis SC, Owen P (1998) Nitrous oxide emissions from excreta applied in a simulated grazing pattern. Soil Biol Biochem 30:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zanatta JA (2009) Emissão de óxido nitroso afetada por sistemas de manejo do solo e fontes de nitrogênio. Theses, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Fernandes de Bastos
    • 1
  • Emanuelle Cavazini Magiero
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michely Tomazi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Janquieli Schirmann
    • 1
  • Murilo G. Veloso
    • 1
  • Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho
    • 1
    • 4
  • Cimélio Bayer
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science and Graduate Program on Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Life SciencesFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Secretary for Rural Development and Cooperativism of Rio Grande do Sul StatePorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Agropecuary West)DouradosBrazil
  4. 4.Grazing Ecology Research Group, Faculty of Agricultural and Life SciencesFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations