A 3-year assessment of nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung of grazing sheep in a subtropical ecosystem
- 75 Downloads
Grazing livestock has strong impact on global nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by providing N sources through excreta. The scarcity of information on factors influencing N2O emissions from sheep excreta in subtropical ecosystems such as those of Southern Brazil led us to conduct field trials in three different winter pasture seasons on an integrated crop–livestock system (ICL) in order to assess N2O emission factors (EF-N2O) in response to variable rates of urine and dung.
Materials and methods
The equivalent urine-N loading rates for the three winter seasons (2009, 2010, and 2013) ranged from 96 to 478 kg ha−1, and the dung-N rates applied in 2009 and 2010 were 81 and 76 kg ha−1, respectively. Air was sampled from closed static chambers (0.20 m in diameter) for approximately 40 days after excreta application and analyzed for N2O by gas chromatography.
Results and discussion
Soil N2O-N fluxes spanned the ranges 4 to 353 μg m−2 h−1 in 2009, − 47 to 976 μg m−2 h−1 in 2010, and 46 to 339 μg m−2 h−1 in 2013. Urine addition resulted in N2O-N peaks within for up to 20–30 days after application in the 3 years, and the strength of the peaks was linearly related to the N rate used. Emission factors of N2O (EF-N2O, % of N applied that is emitted as N2O) of urine ranged from 0.06 to 0.34% and were essentially independent of N rate applied. By considering a ratio of N excreted by urine and dung of 60:40, a single combined excretal EF-N2O of 0.14% was estimated.
Our findings showed higher mean EF-N2O for sheep urine than that for dung (0.21% vs 0.03%), irrespective of the occurrence or not of urine patches overlap. This value is much lower than default value of 1% of IPCC’s Tier 1 and reinforces the needs of its revision.
KeywordsGreenhouse gases Livestock Nitrous oxide Subtropical environment
This work was funded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Research Support Foundation of the Rio Grande do Sul state (FAPERGS).
- Chadwick DR, Cardenas LM, Dhanoa MS, Donovan N, Misselbrook T, Williams JR, Thorman RE, McGeough KL, Watson CJ, Bell M, Anthony SG (2018) The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories. Sci Total Environ 635:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Klein CA, Harvey MJ (2015) Nitrous oxide chamber methodology guidelines–version 1.1 Ministry for Primary Industries. 146 ppGoogle Scholar
- Firestone MK, Davidson EA (1989) Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. In: Andreae M O, Schimel D S. eds. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. John Wiley & Sons 1:7–21Google Scholar
- Hyde B, Ryan M, Hawkins M, Connolly J, Carton OT (2005) Nitrous oxide emissions. In: End of project report RMIS 4974. Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford 1:0–26Google Scholar
- IBGE (2010) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo agropecuário, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2007). In: S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA [technical summary]Google Scholar
- IPCC (2013) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Luo J, Van Der Weerden T, Hoogendoorn C, De Klein C (2009) Determination of the N2O emission factor for animal dung applied in spring in three regions of New Zealand. Report for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGoogle Scholar
- MCTI, Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação (2014) Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil - 2ª edição. MCTI, Brasília, 168. Disponível em http://www.mct.gov.br
- MCTI, Ministério da Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação (2016) Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil - 3ª edição. MCTI, Brasília, 168. Disponível em https://sirene.mctic.gov.br/portal/export/sites/sirene/backend/galeria/arquivos/2018/10/11/Estimativas_3ed.pdf
- Mosier AR (1989) Chamber and isotope techniques. In: Andreae MO, Schimel DS (eds) Exchange of traces gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere: report of the Dahlem Workshop. Wiley, Berlin, pp 175–187Google Scholar
- Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LCH, Oliveira VA, Oliveira JB, Coelho MR, Lumbreras JF, Cunha TJF, 2006. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 2ed. Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro. 306 ppGoogle Scholar
- Selbie DR, Buckthought LE, Shepherd MA (2015) The challenge of the urine patch for managing nitrogen in grazed pasture systems. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic Press, London, pp 229–292Google Scholar
- Zanatta JA (2009) Emissão de óxido nitroso afetada por sistemas de manejo do solo e fontes de nitrogênio. Theses, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulGoogle Scholar