Advertisement

Distribution and availability of fungicide-derived copper in soil aggregates

  • Quan-Ying Wang
  • Jing-Yue Sun
  • Xing-Jian Xu
  • Hong-Wen YuEmail author
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Soil consists of various sizes of aggregates, and different soil aggregates vary in their abilities to adsorb or transport metals. This study aimed to investigate the distribution behaviors of Cu from different fungicides in soil aggregates after a 15-month incubation.

Materials and methods

Bordeaux mixture (CuSO4/Ca(OH)2 = 1/1 by weight, BR), copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·4H2O, CN), and copper oxychloride (3Cu(OH)2·CuCl2, CO) were applied to a representative Chinese Mollisol to reach the Cu content 200 mg kg−1. Five soil aggregate fractions, i.e., > 2000 μm, 2000–1000 μm, 1000–500 μm, 500–250 μm, and < 250 μm, were obtained by the wet sieving method. The modified Bureau Communautaire de Références (BCR) sequential extraction was applied to assess the Cu distribution among the main soil fractions.

Results and discussion

The highest Cu mass loading was found for the > 2000-μm soil aggregate. The input Cu was mainly in stable fractions, and the highest proportion was found for the residual fraction. The bioavailability and mobility of Cu from different fungicides in soils varied from each other, and they presented an order of CO > CN > BR. High bioavailability and transferring coefficients were found in the < 250-μm and > 2000-μm soil aggregates.

Conclusions

This study indicated that the input Cu from fungicides mainly distributed in the > 2000-μm soil aggregates. Moreover, the CO-derived Cu presented a higher availability than the BR- and CN-derived Cu in the soil.

Keywords

Bioavailability Chemical form Copper-based fungicides Soil aggregates 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41771356), the Project of Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province (No. 20180101315JC), the Outstanding Young Talents Foundation of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. DLSYQ14003), and the 135 Breading Project of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. Y6H2081001).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Acosta JA, Cano AF, Arocena JM, Debela F, Martinez-Martinez S (2009) Distribution of metals in soil particle size fractions and its implication to risk assessment of playgrounds in Murcia City (Spain). Geoderma 149:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta JA, Faze A, Kalbitz K, Jansen B, Martinez-Martinez S (2011) Heavy metal concentrations in particle size fractions from street dust of Murcia (Spain) as the basis for risk assessment. J Environ Monit 13:3087–3096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriano DC (2001) Trace elements in terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability and risks of metals, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alan M, Kara D (2019) Assessment of sequential extraction methods for the prediction of bioavailability of elements in plants grown on agricultural soils near to boron mines in Turkey. Talanta 200:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arias-Estévez M, López-Periago E, Martínez-Carballo E, Simal-Gándar J, Mejuto JC, García-Río L (2008) The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besnard E, Chenu C, Robert M (2001) Influence of organic amendments on copper distribution among particle size and density fractions in Champagne vineyard soils. Environ Pollut 112:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, He F, Zhang X, Sun X, Zheng J, Zheng J (2014) Heavy metal pollution decreases microbial abundance, diversity and activity within particle-size fractions of a paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:164–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Farhan YH, Denovio NM, Herman JS, Hornberger GM (2000) Mobilization and transport of soil particles during infiltration experiments in an agricultural field, Shenandoah Valley, Virginia. Environ Sci Technol 34:3555–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliot ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:518–524Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2002) EC (European Commission) regulation 473/2002 amending Annexes I, II and VI to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs, and laying down detailed rules as regards the transmission of information on the use of copper compoundsGoogle Scholar
  11. Farshadirad A, Hosseinpur A, Motaghian H (2019) Distribution and availability of copper in aggregate size fractions of some calcareous soils. J Soils Sediments 19:1866–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GB 15618-2018 (2018) Soil environmental quality-risk control standard for soil contamination of agricultural landGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong C, Ma L, Cheng H, Liu Y, Xu D, Li B, Liu F, Ren Y, Liu Z, Zhao C, Yang K, Nie H, Lang C (2014) Characterization of the particle size fraction associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China. J Geochem Explor 139:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González-Rodríguez RM, Rial-Otero R, Cancho-Grande B, Gonzalez-Barreiro C, Simal-Gándara J (2011) A review on the fate of pesticides during the processes within the food production chain. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo GL, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Wang SJ, Yan ZG, Li FS (2013) Partition and characterization of cadmium on different particle-size aggregates in Chinese Phaeozem. Geoderma 200–201:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang B, Li ZW, Li DQ, Yuan ZJ, Chen ZL, Huang JQ (2017) Distribution characteristics of heavy metal(loid)s in aggregates of different size fractions along contaminated paddy soil profile. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:23939–23952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Komárek M, Vaněk A, Chrastný V, Száková J, Kubová K, Drahotad P, Balíka J (2009) Retention of copper originating from different fungicides in contrasting soil types. J Hazard Mater 166:1395–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Komárek M, Čadková E, Chrastný V, Bordas F, Bollinger JC (2010) Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: a review of environmental and toxicological aspects. Environ Int 36:138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li WQ, Zhang M, Shu HR (2005) Distribution and fractionation of copper in soils of apple orchards. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li HX, Yuan YH, Huang QR, Hu F, Pan GX (2008) Effects of long term fertilization on labile organic carbon in soil aggregates in red paddy soil. Acta Pedol Sin 45:259–266Google Scholar
  21. Li Z, Wu L, Luo Y, Christie P (2014) Dynamics of plant metal uptake and metal changes in whole soil and soil particle fractions during repeated phytoextraction. Plant Soil 374:857–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Q, Du HH, Chen WL, Hao JL, Huang QY, Cai P, Feng XH (2018) Aging shapes the distribution of copper in soil aggregate size fractions. Environ Pollut 233:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ljung K, Selinus O, Otabbong E, Berglund M (2006) Metal and arsenic distribution in soil particle sizes relevant to soil ingestion by children. Appl Geochem 21:1613–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma YB, Lombi E, Nolan AL, McLaughlin MJ (2006a) Short-term natural attenuation of copper in soils: effects of time, temperature, and soil characteristics. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:652–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma YB, Lombi E, Oliver IW, Nolan AL, McLaughlin MJ (2006b) Long-term aging of copper added to soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:6310–6317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michaud AM, Bravin MN, Galleguillos M, Hinsinger P (2007) Copper uptake and phytotoxicity as assessed in situ for durum wheat (Triticum turgidum durum L.) cultivated in Cu-contaminated, former vineyard soils. Plant Soil 298:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirlean N, Roisenberg A, Chies JO (2007) Metal contamination of vineyard soils in wet subtropics (southern Brazil). Environ Pollut 149:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Queijeiro JMG, Blanco-Ward D, Álvarez-Olleros C, Martínez-Cortizas A, García-Rodeja E (2007) Total copper content and its distribution in acid vineyards soils developed from granitic rocks. Sci Total Environ 378:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pateiro-Moure M, Arias-Estévez M, Simal-Gándara J (2010) Critical review on the environmental fate of quaternary ammonium herbicides in soils devoted to vineyards. Environ Sci Technol 47:4984–4998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pietrzak U, McPhail DC (2004) Copper accumulation, distribution and fractionation in vineyard soils of Victoria, Australia. Geoderma 122:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Plathe KL, Von Der Kammer F, Hassellöv M, Moore JN, Murayama M, Hofmann T, Hochella MF (2013) The role of nanominerals and mineral nanoparticles in the transport of toxic trace metals: field-flow fractionation and analytical TEM analyses after nanoparticle isolation and density separation. Geochim. Cosmochim Acta 102:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao ZX, Huang DY, Wu JS, Zhu QH, Zhu HH, Xu C, Xiong J, Wang H, Duan MM (2018) Distribution and availability of cadmium in profile and aggregates of a paddy soil with 30-year fertilization and its impact on Cd accumulation in rice plant. Environ Pollut 239:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rauret G, López-Sanchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Favidson C, Ure A, Quevauviller P (1999) Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit 1:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Regueiro J, López-Fernández O, Rial-Otero R, Cancho-Grande B, Simal-Gándara J (2015) A review on the fermentation of foods and the residues of pesticides-biotransformation of pesticides and effects on fermentation and food quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:839–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruyters S, Salaets P, Oorts K, Smolders E (2013) Copper toxicity in soils under established vineyards in Europe: a survey. Sci Total Environ 443:470–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sekine R, Marzouk ER, Khaksar M, Scheckel KG, Stegemeier JP, Lowry GV, Donner E, Lombi E (2017) Aging of dissolved copper and copper-based nanoparticles in five different soils: short-term kinetics vs. long-term fate. J Environ Qual 46:1198–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semlali RM, Van Oort F, Denaix L, Loubet M (2001) Estimating distributions of endogenous and exogenous Pb in soils by using Pb isotopic ratios. Environ Sci Technol 35:4180–4188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (2000) Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biol Biochem 32:2099–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun YC, Chi PH, Shiue MY (2001) Comparison of different digestion methods for total decomposition of siliceous and organic environmental samples. Anal Sci 17:1395–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sutherland RA (2003) Lead in grain size fractions of road-deposited sediment. Environ Pollut 121:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water stable aggregate. J Soil Sci 33:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang QY, Zhou DM, Cang L (2009) Microbial and enzyme properties of apple orchard soil as affected by long-term application of copper fungicide. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1504–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang QY, Liu JS, Wang Y, Yu HW (2015) Accumulations of copper in apple orchard soils: distribution and availability in soil aggregate fractions. J Soils Sediments 15:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang QY, Hu B, Yu HW (2016a) Adsorption behaviors of fungicide-derived copper onto various size fractions of aggregates from orchard soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24983–24990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang QY, Liu JS, Hu B (2016b) Integration of copper subcellular distribution and chemical forms to understand copper toxicity in apple trees. Environ Exp Bot 123:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang QY, Sun JY, Xu XJ, Yu HW (2018) Integration of chemical and toxicological tools to assess the bioavailability of copper derived from different copper-based fungicides in soil. Ecotox Environ Safe 161:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xiao R, Zhang M, Yao X, Ma Z, Yu F, Bai J (2016) Heavy metal distribution in different soil aggregate size classes from restored brackish marsh, oil exploitation zone, and tidal mud flat of the Yellow River Delta. J Soils Sediments 16:821–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao L, Guan D, Peart MR, Chen Y, Li Q (2017) The respective effects of soil heavy metal fractions by sequential extraction procedure and soil properties on the accumulation of heavy metals in rice grains and brassicas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:2558–2571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu L, Cui HB, Zheng XB, Zhou J, Zhang WH, Liang JN, Zhou J (2017) Changes in the heavy metal distributions in whole soil and aggregates affected by the application of alkaline materials and phytoremediation. RSC Adv 7:41033–41042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang MK, He ZL, Calvert DV, Stoffella PJ, Yang XE, Li YC (2003) Phosphorus and heavy metal attachment and release in sandy soil aggregate fractions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1158–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang L, Li L, Pan G, Cui L, Li H, Wu X, Shao J (2009) Effect of heavy metals pollution on paddy soil aggregates composition and heavy metals distribution. Chin J Appl Ecol 20:2806–2812Google Scholar
  52. Zhang Q, Li ZW, Huang B, Luo NL, Long LZ, Huang M, Zhai XQ, Zeng GM (2017) Effect of land use pattern change from paddy soil to vegetable soil on the adsorption-desorption of cadmium by soil aggregates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:2734–2743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quan-Ying Wang
    • 1
  • Jing-Yue Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xing-Jian Xu
    • 1
  • Hong-Wen Yu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Wet Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations