Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Using multiple composite fingerprints to quantify source contributions and uncertainties in an arid region

Abstract

Purpose

Developing targeted protection measures at a watershed scale requires spatially distributed information of sediment sources. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to (1) test and evaluate the ability of multiple composite fingerprints (MCF) to quantify sediment provenance using multiple particle size classes in an arid region; (2) quantify uncertainty of the estimated proportional contributions of sediment sources; and (3) provide decision support information for sediment control in the Danghe Reservoir Watershed.

Materials and methods

In total, 66 samples were collected from north alluvial fan, south alluvial fan, and high mountains, and all samples were divided into six particle size groups. A multistep test was used to remove the tracers that were non-conservative, unable to differentiate sources, or highly variable within a source. Based on geochemical properties of distributed source samples and a linear mixing model, a MCF method with multiple particle size tracking was used to estimate proportions of three potential source contributions. More importantly, the uncertainty of sediment source contributions was quantified using the Gaussian first-order approximation.

Results and discussion

The results showed that the MCF method with multiple particle size tracking could obtain relatively accurate estimates of the contributions with an overall mean absolute relative error of 3.5% and a relatively narrow 95% confidence interval. The major contributions were consistently coming from the high mountains for all six particle groups. During these runoff events, the overall estimated mean proportions were 49.0%, 26.5%, and 24.5% from the high mountains, south alluvial fan, and north alluvial fan, respectively. Furthermore, the Gaussian first-order approximation revealed that more than 60% of the total uncertainty contribution was a byproduct of the downstream sediment mixture, while each individual sediment source produced less than 15% of the absolute uncertainty.

Conclusions

Acquiring watershed scale sediment source information is challenging and the MCF method proved accurate. A majority of the contribution uncertainties were associated with the downstream sediment mixture, which is because the sediment sink inherited both spatial and temporal variations of all contributing sources. Consequently, a larger sample size is recommended for sediment mixtures, compared to each sediment source, in order to increase the accuracy of the source proportion estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bak L, Michalik A, Tekielak T (2013) The relationship between bank erosion, local aggradation and sediment transport in a small Carpathian stream. Geomorphology 191:51–63

  2. Barker R, Dixon L, Hooke J (1997) Use of terrestrial photogrammetry for monitoring and measuring bank erosion. Earth Surf Process Landf 22:1217–1227

  3. Boardman J, Favis-ortlock D, Foster I (2015) A 13-year record of erosion on badland sites in the Karoo, South Africa. Earth Surf Process Landf 40:1964–1981

  4. Cao YZ, Coote DR (1993) Topography and water erosion in northern Shaanxi Province, China. Geoderma 59:249–262

  5. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1996) Composite fingerprinting of the spatial source of fluvial suspended sediment: a case study of the Exe and Severn river basins, United Kingdom. Geomorphol Relief Process Environ 2:41–53

  6. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks G (1997) Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique. Catena 29:1–27

  7. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1998) Use of composite fingerprints to determine the spatial provenance of the contemporary suspended sediment load transported by rivers. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:31–52

  8. Collins AL, Walling DE, Webb L, King P (2010) Apportioning catchment scale sediment sources using a modified composite fingerprinting technique incorporating property weightings and prior information. Geoderma 155:249–261

  9. Collins AL, Pulley S, Foster ID, Gellis A, Porto P, Horowitz AJ (2017) Sediment source fingerprinting as an aid to catchment management: a review of the current state of knowledge and a methodological decision-tree for end-users. J Environ Manag 194:86–108

  10. Davis RJ, Gregory KJ (1994) A new distinct mechanism of river bank erosion in a forested catchment. J Hydrol 157:1–11

  11. Devereux OH, Prestegaard KL, Needelman BA, Gellis AC (2010) Suspended-sediment sources in an urban watershed, Northeast Branch Anacostia River, Maryland. Hydrol Process 24:1391–1403

  12. Emamgholizadeh S, Bateni SM, Nielson JR (2018) Evaluation of different strategies for management of reservoir sedimentation in semi-arid regions: a case study (Dez Reservoir). Lake Reservoir Manag 34:270–282

  13. Evrard O, Poulenard J, Nemery J, Ayrault S, Gratiot N, Duvert C, Prat C, Lefevre I, Bonte P, Esteves M (2013) Tracing sediment sources in a tropical highland catchment of central Mexico by using conventional and alternative fingerprinting methods. Hydrol Process 27:911–922

  14. Gingele FX, Deckker PD (2005) Clay mineral, geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic fingerprinting of sediments in the Murray-Darling fluvial system, southeast Australia. J Geol Soc Aust 52:965–974

  15. Gonzalez JM (2018) Runoff and losses of nutrients and herbicides under long-term conservation practices (no-till and crop rotation) in the U.S. Midwest: a variable intensity simulated rainfall approach. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6:265–274

  16. Haddadchi A, Olley J, Laceby P (2014) Accuracy of mixing models in predicting sediment source contributions. Sci Total Environ 497-498:139–152

  17. Haddadchi A, Olley J, Pietsch T (2015) Quantifying sources of suspended sediment in three size fractions. J Soils Sediments 15:2086–2100

  18. Hancock GJ, Revill AT (2013) Erosion source discrimination in a rural Australian catchment using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA). Hydrol Process 27:923–932

  19. Khaba L, Griffiths JA (2017) Calculation of reservoir capacity loss due to sediment deposition in the Muela reservoir, Northern Lesotho. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 5:130–140

  20. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2013) The behavioural characteristics of sediment properties and their implications for sediment fingerprinting as an approach for identifying sediment sources in river basins. Earth-Sci Rev 125:24–42

  21. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2018) Assessment of particle size and organic matter correction factors in sediment source fingerprinting investigations: an example of two contrasting watersheds in Canada. Geoderma 325:195–207

  22. Krause AK, Franks SW, Kalma JD, Loughran RJ, Rowan JS (2003) Multi-parameter fingerprinting of sediment deposition in a small gullied catchment in SE Australia. Catena 53:327–348

  23. Laceby JP, Olley J (2015) An examination of geochemical modelling approaches to tracing sediment sources incorporating distribution mixing and elemental correlations. Hydrol Process 29:1669–1685

  24. Lamba J, Karthikeyan KG, Thompson AM (2015) Using radiometric fingerprinting and phosphorus to elucidate sediment transport dynamics in an agricultural watershed. Hydrol Process 29:2681–2693

  25. Lance JC, McIntyre SC, Naney JW, Rousseva SS (1986) Measuring sediment movement at low erosion rates using cesium137. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1303–1309

  26. Liebe J, van de Giesen N, Andreini M (2005) Estimation of small reservoir storage capacities in a semi-arid environment. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 30:448–454

  27. Liu B, Niu Q, Qu J, Zu R (2016) Quantifying the provenance of aeolian sediments using multiple composite fingerprints. Aeolian Res 22:117–122

  28. McKinley R, Radcliffe D, Mukundan R (2013) A streamlined approach for sediment source fingerprinting in a Southern Piedmont watershed, USA. J Soils Sediments 13:1754–1769

  29. Minella JPG, Walling DE, Merten GH (2008) Combining sediment source tracing techniques with traditional monitoring to assess the impact of improved land management on catchment sediment yields. J Hydrol 348:546–563

  30. Motha JA, Wallbrink PJ, Hairsine PB, Grayson RB (2003) Determining the sources of suspended sediment in a forested catchment in southeastern Australia. Water Resour Res 39:53–62

  31. Nagle GN, Fahey TJ, Ritchie JC, Woodbury PB (2007) Variations in sediment sources and yields in the Finger Lakes and Catskills regions of New York. Hydrol Process 21:828–838

  32. Niu B, Qu J, Zhang X, Liu B, Tan L, An Z (2019) Quantifying provenance of reservoir sediment using multiple composite fingerprints in an arid region experiencing both wind and water erosion. Geomorphology 332:112–121

  33. Olley JM, Murray AS, Mackenzie DH, Edwards K (1993) Identifying sediment sources in a gullied catchment using natural and anthropogenic radioactivity. Water Resour Res 29:1037–1043

  34. Palazon L, Navas A (2017) Variability in source sediment contributions by applying different statistic test for a Pyrenean catchment. J Environ Manag 194:42–53

  35. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127:171–179

  36. Pulley S, Foster I, Antunes P (2015) The uncertainties associated with sediment fingerprinting suspended and recently deposited fluvial sediment in the Nene river basin. Geomorphology 228:303–319

  37. Roo APJD (1991) The use of 137 Cs as a tracer in an erosion study in south limburg (the Netherlands) and the influence of chernobyl fallout. Hydrol Process 5:215–227

  38. Stewart HA, Massoudieh A, Gellis A (2015) Sediment source apportionment in Laurel Hill Creek, PA, using Bayesian chemical mass balance and isotope fingerprinting. Hydrol Process 29:2545–2560

  39. Stone M, Collins AL, Silins U, Emelko MB, Zhang YS (2014) The use of composite fingerprints to quantify sediment sources in a wildfire impacted landscape, Alberta, Canada. Sci Total Environ 473-474:642–650

  40. Thakur PK, Laha C, Aggarwal SP (2012) River bank erosion hazard study of river Ganga, upstream of Farakka barrage using remote sensing and GIS. Nat Hazards 61:967–987

  41. Wallbrink PJ, Olley JM, Hancock GJ (2003) Tracer assessment of catchment sediment contributions to Western Port, Victoria. CSIRO Land and Water technical report 08/03

  42. Walling DE (2005) Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems. Sci Total Environ 344:159–184

  43. Walling DE (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675

  44. Wilkinson SN, Hancock GJ, Bartley R, Hawdon AA, Keen RJ (2013) Using sediment tracing to assess processes and spatial patterns of erosion in grazed rangelands, Burdekin River basin, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:90–102

  45. Zhang XC, Liu BL (2016) Using multiple composite fingerprints to quantify fine sediment source contributions: a new direction. Geoderma 268:108–118

  46. Zhang XC, Liu BL, Liu B, Zhang GH (2016a) Quantifying sediment provenance using multiple composite fingerprints in a small watershed in Oklahoma. J Environ Qual 45:1296–1302

  47. Zhang XC, Zhang GH, Liu BL, Liu B (2016b) Using cesium-137 to quantify sediment source contribution and uncertainty in a small watershed. Catena 140:116–124

  48. Zhang XC, Nearing MA, Garbrecht JD (2017) Gaining insights into interrill soil erosion processes using rare earth element tracers. Geoderma 299:63–72

  49. Zhou H, Chang W, Zhang L (2016) Sediment sources in a small agricultural catchment: a composite fingerprinting approach based on the selection of potential sources. Geomorphology 266:11–19

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs. Caixia Zhang for her help in carrying out the elemental analysis, and thank the Technology Service Center of CAREERI, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for the sample testing service. Meanwhile, we also thank CSC for supporting this paper. The study was supported by the National Science Fund of China (41501008 and 41701008), the “Light of West China” Program of the CAS, the Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province (17JR5RA303), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the CAS (2016373), and technology Research and Development Program of China Railway Corporation (2017G004-E).

Author information

Correspondence to Benli Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Alexander Koiter

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, B., Zhang, X.(., Qu, J. et al. Using multiple composite fingerprints to quantify source contributions and uncertainties in an arid region. J Soils Sediments 20, 1097–1111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02424-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Arid region
  • Multiple composite fingerprints
  • Sediment provenance
  • Uncertainty analysis