Advertisement

Fractal features of sandy soil particle-size distributions during the rangeland desertification process on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

  • Xiao Feng
  • Jianjun QuEmail author
  • Lihai Tan
  • Qingbin Fan
  • Qinghe Niu
Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Fractal theory has been frequently applied to quantify soil particle-size distributions (PSDs) and evaluate soil degradation. Eolian desertification occurring on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is threatening the ecological environment. It is essential to investigate the desertification process by adopting the concept of space as a substitute for time. Here, the fractal features of soil PSDs and their relationships with selected soil properties and wind erosion and deposition were studied.

Materials and methods

The tested soil samples were collected from rangelands with four different degrees of desertification (light, medium, severe, and extremely severe). Soil particle sizes were measured by a laser diffraction particle-size analyzer. Soil moisture and soil bulk density were determined by the soil weight difference before and after oven-drying for 8 h. Soil organic carbon was determined by the K2Cr2O7-H2SO4 oxidation method and soil total nitrogen was analyzed using the Kjeldahl digestion procedure. Wind tunnel experiments were conducted to simulate wind erosion and deposition during the desertification process. Values of the fractal dimension of soil PSDs were calculated using the volume-based fractal model. ANOVA with an LSD test and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze whether different parameters used in the fractal model influenced the results of the fractal dimensions and were reasonable to be applied.

Results and discussion

Different parameters, including the arithmetic mean size and the upper sieve size of two successive sieve sizes, values of Rmin, and the number of data points used in the fractal model, rarely influenced the results of the fractal dimensions (p > 0.05). The D values showed a significantly positive correlation with the clay and silt contents and a strong negative correlation with the sand contents. Along the degrees of desertification from light to extremely severe, the contents of clay, silt, and very fine sand decreased while the fine sand contents increased, and the D values decreased accordingly. Rangelands with heavier desertification and lower D values were more easily exposed to wind erosion, relating to the further loss of soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen, and soil moisture and increased soil bulk density. The soil depth could affect soil PSDs and the selected soil properties of rangelands under light and medium degrees of desertification but rarely influenced those of severely and extremely severely desertified lands.

Conclusions

Different parameters, including the arithmetic mean size, the upper sieve size, values of Rmin, and the number of data points used in the fractal model, had no impacts on the results of the fractal dimensions, and were reasonable to be applied. We suggest the fractal dimension as an effective indicator to evaluate soil environment changes induced by desertification.

Keywords

Fractal dimension Desertification process Soil particle-size distributions Soil properties Wind erosion and deposition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant No. 2017YFC0504804). The authors thank Yang Gao and Baicheng Niu for assistance with soil sampling in the field.

References

  1. Bayat H, Rastgou M, Nemes A, Mansourizadeh M, Zamani P (2017) Mathematical models for soil particle-size distribution and their overall and fraction-wise fitting to measurements. Eur J Soil Sci 68:345–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bittelli M, Campbell GS, Flury M (1999) Characterization of particle-size distribution in soils with a fragmentation model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao YZ, Wang XD, Lu XY, Yan Y, Fan JH (2013) Soil organic carbon and nutrients along an alpine grassland transect across Northern Tibet. J Mt Sci 10:564–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comegna V, Damiani P, Sommella A (1998) Use of a fractal model for determining soil water retention curves. Geoderma 85:307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford JW, Sleemant BD, Young IM (1993) On the relation between number-size distributions and the fractal dimension of aggregates. J Soil Sci 44:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng JF, Li JH, Deng G, Zhu HY, Zhang RH (2017) Fractal scaling of particle-size distribution and associations with soil properties of Mongolian pine plantations in the Mu Us Desert, China. Sci Rep 7:6742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong ZB, Hu GY, Yan CZ, Wang WL, Lu JF (2010) Aeolian desertification and its causes in the Zoige Plateau of China’s Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Environ Earth Sci 59:1731–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong ZB, Hu GY, Qian GQ, Lu JF, Zhang ZC, Luo WY, Lyu P (2017) High-altitude Aeolian research on the Tibetan Plateau. Rev Geophys 55:864–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filgueira RR, Fournier LL, Cerisola CI, Gelati P, García MG (2006) Particle-size distribution in soils: a critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma 134:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao GL, Ding GD, Wu B, Zhang YQ, Qin SG, Zhao YY, Bao YF, Liu YD, Wan L, Deng JF (2014a) Fractal scaling of particle size distribution and relationships with topsoil properties affected by biological soil crusts. PlosOne 9:e88559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao GL, Ding GD, Zhao YY, Wu B, Zhang YQ, Qin SG, Bao YF, Yu MH, Liu YD (2014b) Fractal approach to estimating changes in soil properties following the establishment of Caragana korshinskii shelterbelts in Ningxia, NW China. Ecol Indic 43:236–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghanbarian B, Daigle H (2015) Fractal dimension of soil fragment mass-size distribution: a critical analysis. Geoderma 245:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B, Hunt AG (2012) Estimation of soil-water retention from particle-size distribution: fractal approaches. Soil Sci 177:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B, Millán H (2009) The relationship between surface fractal dimension and soil water content at permanent wilting point. Geoderma 151:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harper RJ, Gilkes RJ, Hill MJ, Carter DJ (2010) Wind erosion and soil carbon dynamics in South-Western Australia. Aeolian Res 1:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu GY, Jin HJ, Dong ZB, Lu JF, Yan CZ (2013) Driving forces of aeolian desertification in the source region of the Yellow River: 1975–2005. Environ Earth Sci 70:3245–3254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu GY, Dong ZB, Lu JF, Yan CZ (2015) The developmental trend and influencing factors of aeolian desertification in the Zoige Basin, eastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Aeolian Res 19:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang G, Zhang R (2005) Evaluation of soil water retention curve with the pore–solid fractal model. Geoderma 127:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang SI, Lee KP, Lee DS, Powers SE (2002) Models for estimating soil particle-size distributions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jin Z, Dong YS, Qi YC, Liu WG, An ZS (2013) Characterizing variations in soil particle-size distribution along a grass-desert shrub transition in the Ordos plateau of Inner Mongolia, China. Land Degrad Dev 24:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keller T, Håkansson I (2010) Estimation of reference bulk density from soil particle size distribution and soil organic matter content. Geoderma 154:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokulan V, Akinremi O, Moulin AP, Kumaragamage D (2018) Importance of terrain attributes in relation to the spatial distribution of soil properties at the micro scale: a case study. Can J Soil Sci 98:292–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Okin GS, Alvarez L, Epstein H (2007) Quantitative effects of vegetation cover on wind erosion and soil nutrient loss in a desert grassland of southern New Mexico, USA. Biogeochemistry 85:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li K, Yang HX, Han X, Xue L, Lv Y, Li J, Fu Z, Li C, Shen W, Guo H, Zhang Y (2018) Fractal features of soil particle size distributions and their potential as an indicator of Robinia pseudoacacia invasion 1. Sci Rep 8:7075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu X, Zhang G, Heathman GC, Wang Y, Huang CH (2009) Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution as affected by plant communities in the forested region of Mountain Yimeng, China. Geoderma 154:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu YY, Gong YM, Wang X, Hu YK (2013) Volume fractal dimension of soil particles and relationships with soil physical-chemical properties and plant species diversity in an alpine grassland under different disturbance degrees. J Arid Land 5:480–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu CX, Yu G, Xiao Y (2013) Wind tunnel simulation and evaluation of soil conservation function of alpine grassland in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Ecol Econ 86:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu JF, Dong ZB, Li WJ, Hu GY (2014) The effect of desertification on carbon and nitrogen status in the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Environ Earth Sci 71:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W H Freeman, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millán H, Gonzalez-Posada M, Aguilar M, Domınguez J, Cespedes L (2003) On the fractal scaling of soil data. Particle-size distributions. Geoderma 117:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng G, Xiang N, Lv SQ, Zhang GC (2014) Fractal characterization of soil particle-size distribution under different land-use patterns in the Yellow River Delta wetland in China. J Soils Sediments 14:1116–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng HT, Horton R, Lei TW, Dai ZC, Wang XP (2015) A modified method for estimating fine and coarse fractal dimensions of soil particle size distributions based on laser diffraction analysis. J Soils Sediments 15:937–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perrier EMA, Bird NRA (2002) Modelling soil fragmentation: the pore solid fractal approach. Soil Tillage Res 64:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrier E, Bird N, Rieu M (1999) Generalizing the fractal model of soil structure: the pore–solid fractal approach. Geoderma 88:137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skaggs TH, Arya LM, Shouse PJ, Mohanty BP (2001) Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1038–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Su YZ, Zhao HL, Zhao WZ, Zhang TH (2004) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma 122:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turcotte DL (1986) Fractals and fragmentation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 91:1921–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1989) Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:987–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1992) Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang XM, Lang LL, Yan P, Wang GT, Li H, Ma WY, Hua T (2016) Aeolian processes and their effect on sandy desertification of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: a wind tunnel experiment. Soil Tillage Res 158:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang XM, Lang LL, Hua T, Li H, Zhang CX, Ma WY (2018) Effects of aeolian processes on soil nutrient loss in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: an experimental study. J Soils Sediments 18:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu Q, Borkovec M, Sticher H (1993) On particle-size distributions in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu GC, Li ZB, Li P (2013) Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution and total soil nitrogen distribution in a typical watershed in the source area of the middle Dan River, China. Catena 101:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yan H, Wang SQ, Wang CY, Zhang GP, Patel N (2005) Losses of soil organic carbon under wind erosion in China. Glob Chang Biol 11:828–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yan YC, Wang X, Guo ZJ, Chen J, Xin X, Xu D, Yan R, Chen B, Xu L (2018) Influence of wind erosion on dry aggregate size distribution and nutrients in three steppe soils in northern China. Catena 170:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang J, Chang QR, Qi YB (2009) Fractal characteristics of soil under ecological restoration in the agro-pastoral transition zone of Northern China. N Z J Agric Res 52:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang CL, Li Q, Shen YP, Zhou N, Wang XS, Li J, Jia WR (2018) Monitoring of aeolian desertification on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the 1970s to 2015 using Landsat images. Sci Total Environ 619:1648–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao HL, Yi XY, Zhou RL, Zhao XY, Zhang TH, Drake S (2006) Wind erosion and sand accumulation effects on soil properties in Horqin sandy farmland, Inner Mongolia. Catena 65:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao HL, He YH, Zhou RL, Su YZ, Li YQ, Drake S (2009) Effects of desertification on soil organic C and N content in sandy farmland and grassland of Inner Mongolia. Catena 77:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao WJ, Cui Z, Ma H (2017) Fractal features of soil particle-size distributions and their relationships with soil properties in gravel-mulched fields. Arab J Geosci 10:211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Feng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianjun Qu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lihai Tan
    • 1
  • Qingbin Fan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qinghe Niu
    • 1
  1. 1.Dunhuang Gobi Desert Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and ResourcesChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations