Advertisement

  • Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • Published:

Determining the depth of mixing layer in which soil solute releasing from soil to surface runoff on the unsaturated loess slope under artificial rainfall condition

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose

The mixing zone depth is a critical parameter in many popular agricultural non-point source pollution (NPS) models. Its variation for some special soil conditions and easily erosive region was limitedly studied. This study dealt with the extent of Br releasing from soil to surface runoff, the actual mixing depth and the calculated one on the unsaturated loess slope, and the influences of soil initial moistures.

Materials and methods

Br was placed as a tracer at different soil depths in the loess slope with three soil initial moistures. Br concentration in surface runoff and soil profiles was monitored under simulated rainfall condition. The actual mixing layer depth was determined by whether Br in that layer could be detected in surface runoff during the whole rainfall process. The average effective depth of interaction (EDI) was calculated by the confirmation method reported before.

Results and discussion

The shallower the application depth, the higher the Br concentration and loss risk in surface runoff. The net loss rate had an exponential decreasing correlation with the solute-applied depth. The depth of Br peak content in soil profile after the rainfall ended increased with the application depth. Br concentration in the surface soil was more than that in the runoff at the end of rainfall, which indicated an incomplete mixing between runoff water and soil water in the mixing layer. Under this experimental condition, the actual mixing layer depth for 3.5% soil moisture slope was about 3 cm, that for 10% soil moisture was 6 cm or so, and that for 20% soil moisture was more than 7 cm. The average EDI calculated for 3.5, 10, and 20% soil moisture was 2.31, 3.76 and 4.95 cm, respectively, which were less than the actual mixing layer depth and more than some former studies.

Conclusions

The traditional 1.0-cm mixing depth in many agricultural NPS models might not be so exact for some special region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Ahuja LR (1982) Release of a soluble chemical from soil to runoff. Trans ASAE 25:948–953 960

  2. Ahuja LR (1986) Characterization and modeling of chemical transfer to runoff. In: Stewart BA (ed) Advances in soil science, vol 4. Springer, New York, pp 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8612-4_3

  3. Ahuja LR (1990) Modeling soluble chemical transfer to runoff with rainfall impact as a diffusion process. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:312–321

  4. Ahuja LR, Sharpley AN, Yamamoto M, Menzel RG (1981) The depth of rainfall-runoff-soil interaction as determined by 32P. Water Resour Res 17:969–974

  5. Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW, Abbaspour KC, White MJ, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Harmel RD, Van Griensven A, Van Liew MW, Kannan N, Jha MK (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASAE 55:1491–1508

  6. Bailey GW, Swank RR, Nicholson HP (1974) Predicting pesticide runoff from agricultural land: a conceptual model 1. J Environ Qual 3:95–102

  7. Bouraou F, Dillaha TA (1996) ANSWERS-2000: runoff and sediment transport model. J Environ Eng 122:493–502

  8. Dong WC, Wang QJ, Zhou BB, Shan YY (2013) A simple model for the transport of soil-dissolved chemicals in runoff by raindrops. Catena 101:129–135

  9. Donigian AS Jr, Beyerlein DC, Davis HH Jr, Crawford NH (1977) Agricultural Runoff Management (ARM) model, Version II: refinement and testing EPA 600/3-77-098. US Environment Protection Agency, Athens

  10. Frere MH, Ross JD, Lane LJ (1980) The nutrient submodel. In: Knisel WG (ed) 1980 CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems, USDA Conserv Res Rep 26 US Gov Print Office, Washington DC

  11. Green T, Houke DF (1979) The mixing of rain with near surface water. J Fluid Mech 90:569–588

  12. Guo S, Zhu H, Dang T, Wu J, Liu W, Hao M (2012) Winter wheat grain yield associated with precipitation distribution under long-term nitrogen fertilization in the semiarid Loess Plateau in China. Geoderma 189–190:442–450

  13. Havis RN, Smith RE, Adrian DD (1992) Partitioning solute transport between infiltration and overland flow under rainfall. Water Resour Res 28:2569–2580

  14. Heathman GC, Ahuja LR, Lehman OR (1985) The transfer of soil surface-applied chemicals to runoff. Trans ASAE 28:1909–1915

  15. Heathman GC, Ahuja LR, Baker JL (1986) Test of a non-uniform mixing model for transfer of herbicides to surface runoff. Trans ASAE 29:0450–0455 461

  16. Huff DD, Kruger P (1967) The chemical and physical parameters in a hydrological transport model for radioactive aerosols. Proc Int Hydrol Symp 1:128–135

  17. Ingram JJ, Woolhiser DA (1980) Chemical transfer into overland flow. In: Proc Symp Watershed Management Boise ID 21-23 July 1980. Am Soc Civ Eng, New York, pp 40–53

  18. Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management system. USDA Conserv Res Rep 26 US Gov Print Office, Washington DC

  19. Lal R (1997) Soil degradative effects of slope length and tillage methods on alfisols in western Nigeria I runoff, erosion and crop response. Land Degrad Dev 8:201–219

  20. Leonard RA, Langdale GW, Fleming WG (1979) Herbicide runoff from upland Piedmont watersheds—data and implications for modeling pesticide transport. J Environ Qual 8:223–229

  21. Li S, Li H, Liang XQ (2009) Rural wastewater irrigation and nitrogen removal by the paddy wetland system in the Tai lake region of China. J Soils Sediments 9(5):433–442

  22. Müller K, Mason K, Strozzi AG, Simpson R, Komatsu T, Kawamoto K (2018) Runoff and nutrient loss from a water-repellent soil. Geoderma 322:28–37

  23. Pan C, Shangguan Z, Lei T (2010) Influences of grass and moss on runoff and sediment yield on sloped loess surfaces under simulated rainfall. Hydrol Process 20:3815–3824

  24. Sharpley AN (1985) Depth of surface soil-runoff interaction as affected by rainfall, soil slope, and management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:010–1015

  25. Shi X, Wu L, Chen W, Wang Q (2011) Solute transfer from the soil surface to overland flow: a review. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1214–1215

  26. Snyder JK, Woolhwaser DA (1985) Effects of infiltration on chemical transport into overland flow. T ASAE 28:1450–1457

  27. Steenhuis TS, Walter MF (1980) Closed form solution for pesticide loss in runoff water. Trans ASAE 23:615–620

  28. Tang KL (2004) Soil and water conservation in China. Science Press, Beijing

  29. Tao WH, Wu JH, Wang QJ (2017) Mathematical model of sediment and solute transport along slope land in different rainfall pattern conditions. Sci Rep 7:44082

  30. Wallach R, Jury WA, Spencer WF (1988) Transfer of chemicals from soil solution to surface runoff: a diffusion-based soil model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:612–618

  31. Wang H (2006) Mechanism and simulation of the nutrient transport on loess slope land during rainfall. PhD Thesis, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University. Yangling, PR China

  32. Wang QJ, Wang WY, Shen J (1994) Modeling solute transport with runoff on loess slope. J Hydraul Eng 11:18–21

  33. Wang QJ, Shao M, Li ZB, Lei TW, Lu DQ (1999) Analysis of simulating methods for soil solute transport with runoff in loess plateau. Res Soil Water Conser 6:67–71 04

  34. Yang T, Wang QJ, Xu D, Lv JB (2015) A method for estimating the interaction depth of surface soil with simulated rain. Catena 124:109–118

  35. Yang T, Wang QJ, Liu YL, Zhang PY, Wu LS (2016) A comparison of mathematical models for chemical transfer from soil to surface runoff with impact of rain. Catena 137:191–202

  36. Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1987) AGNPS, agricultural non-point-source pollution model: a watershed analysis tool. Conservation research report no 35 US Dept of Agr, Agric Res Service, Washington, DC

  37. Zhang XC, Norton D, Nearing MA (1997a) Chemical transfer from soil solution to surface runoff. Water Resour Res 33:809–815

  38. Zhang XC, Norton LD, Hickman M (1997b) Rain pattern and soil moisture content effects on atrazine and metolachlor losses in runoff. J Environ Qual 26:1539–1547

  39. Zhang XC, Norton LD, Lei T, Nearing MA (1999) Coupling mixing zone concept with convection-diffusion equation to predict chemical transfer to surface runoff. Trans ASAE 42:987–994

  40. Zhang YL, Li HE, Zhang XC, Meng QX (2007) Review on the mixing zone depth of rainfall—runoff—soil interaction. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 23:283–290

  41. Zhang X, Li P, Li ZB, Yu GQ, Li C (2018) Effects of precipitation and different distributions of grass strips on runoff and sediment in the loess convex hillslope. Catena 162:130–140

  42. Zheng F, He X, Gao X, Zhang C, Tang K (2005) Effects of erosion patterns on nutrient loss following deforestation on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:85–97

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 40801102; 41571276).

Author information

Correspondence to Xingchang Zhang or Shujuan Shi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Rainer Horn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Shi, S. et al. Determining the depth of mixing layer in which soil solute releasing from soil to surface runoff on the unsaturated loess slope under artificial rainfall condition. J Soils Sediments 20, 153–165 (2020) doi:10.1007/s11368-019-02370-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Actual mixing layer depth
  • Artificial rainfall
  • Confirmation
  • Solute release
  • Unsaturated loess slope