Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 297–307 | Cite as

Contrastive nutrient leaching from two differently textured paddy soils as influenced by biochar addition

  • Binh Thanh Nguyen
  • Binh Trung Phan
  • Tong Xuan Nguyen
  • Vinh Ngoc Nguyen
  • Thanh Van Tran
  • Quang-Vu BachEmail author
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article



The aims of the current study were to (1) examine the interactive effects of biochar addition and differently textured soils (clayey and sandy soils) on nutrient leaching and (2) identify potential mechanisms related to the leaching.

Materials and methods

A repacked soil column experiment was set up to test the effects of five biochar rates added to clayey and sandy soils grown with rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) for 3 months. Four leaching events were conducted to measure concentrations of ten elements in the leachate, including calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+), nitrate nitrogen (NO3), and phosphorus (P).

Results and discussion

On the sandy soil, biochar addition linearly and significantly reduced Ca concentration (by 38%), but increased Na (by 92%), K (by 292%), and P (by 411%) concentrations in the leachate, compared to the non-biochar-added soil. In contrast, on the clayey soil, biochar addition showed no obvious effect on the leaching of these elements. Biochar addition significantly reduced leaching of Al, Fe, Mn, and NH4, but increased leaching of Mg. Mechanisms related to the reduced leaching of NH4, Ca, Al, Fe, and Mn could be involved in the liming effect and increased nutrient holding capacity by biochar addition, and those responsible for increased leaching of Na, K, and P could be involved in co-addition of these elements with the added biochar.


Biochar addition had contrastive effects on nutrient leaching, which was more profound on sandy soil than on clayey soil grown with rice crop.


Biochar Nutrient leaching Paddy soil Soil texture 



The authors are grateful to some students and IESEM’s staffs for help with fieldwork and lab work.

Funding information

The current study was financially supported in part by the Institute of Environmental Science, Engineering, and Management, (IESEM) Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City.

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2366_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 37 kb)


  1. Akhtar MS, Memon M (2009) Biomass and nutrient uptake by rice and wheat: a three-way interaction of potassium, ammonium and soil type. Pak J Bot 41:2965–2974Google Scholar
  2. Annkathrin H, Egbert M (2018) Effects of drying and rewetting on soluble phosphorus and nitrogen in forest floors: an experiment with undisturbed columns. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 181:177–184Google Scholar
  3. Borchard N, Schirrmann M, Cayuela ML, Kammann C, Wrage-Mönnig N, Estavillo JM, Fuertes-Mendizábal T, Sigua G, Spokas K, Ippolito JA, Novak J (2019) Biochar, soil and land-use interactions that reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emissions: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 651:2354–2364Google Scholar
  4. Bortolon L, Gianello C (2010) Simultaneous multielement extraction with the Mehlich-1 solution for southern Brazilian soils determined by ICP-OES and the effects on the nutrients recommendations to crops. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 34:125–132Google Scholar
  5. Bronswijk JJB, Hamminga W, Oostindie K (1995) Rapid nutrient leaching to groundwater and surface water in clay soil areas. Eur J Agron 4:431–439Google Scholar
  6. Bu X, Xue J, Zhao C, Wu Y, Han F (2017) Nutrient leaching and retention in riparian soils as influenced by rice husk biochar addition. Soil Sci 182:241–247Google Scholar
  7. Carter MR, Gregorich EG (2008) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen GC, He ZL, Stoffella PJ, Yang XE, Yu S, Calvert D (2006) Use of dolomite phosphate rock (DPR) fertilizers to reduce phosphorus leaching from sandy soil. Environ Pollut 139:176–182Google Scholar
  9. Dempster DN, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Clay and biochar amendments decreased inorganic but not dissolved organic nitrogen leaching in soil. Soil Res 50:216–221Google Scholar
  10. Devau N, Cadre EL, Hinsinger P, Jaillard B, Gérard F (2009) Soil pH controls the environmental availability of phosphorus: experimental and mechanistic modelling approaches. Appl Geochem 24:2163–2174Google Scholar
  11. Ding Y et al (2016) Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:36Google Scholar
  12. Dondeyne S, Ngatunga EL, Cools N, Dondeyne S, Deckers JA, Merckx R (2001) Buffering capacity of cashew soils in South Eastern Tanzania. Soil Use Manag 17:155–162Google Scholar
  13. Dong D, Xie Z, Du Y, Liu C, Wang S (1999) Influence of soil pH on aluminum availability in the soil and aluminum in tea leaves. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:873–883Google Scholar
  14. El-Naggar A et al (2018) Influence of soil properties and feedstocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma 332:100–108Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2018) FAO rice market monitor (RMM). Available at: Accessed June 2019
  16. Gao S, Deluca T (2016) Influence of biochar on soil nutrient transformations, nutrient leaching, and crop yield. Adv Plant Agr Res 4.
  17. Gransee A, Führs H (2013) Magnesium mobility in soils as a challenge for soil and plant analysis, magnesium fertilization and root uptake under adverse growth conditions. Plant Soil 368:5–21Google Scholar
  18. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195Google Scholar
  19. Iovieno P, Baath E (2008) Effect of drying and rewetting on bacterial growth rates in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:400–407Google Scholar
  20. Jansen van Rensburg HG, Claassens AS, Beukes DJ (2009) Relationships between soil buffer capacity and selected soil properties in a resource-poor farming area in the Mpumalanga Province of South Africa. S Afr J Plant Soil 26:237–243Google Scholar
  21. King KW, Williams MR, Fausey NR (2016) Effect of crop type and season on nutrient leaching to tile drainage under a corn–soybean rotation. J Soil Water Conserv 71:56–68Google Scholar
  22. Knowles OA, Robinson BH, Contangelo A, Clucas L (2011) Biochar for the mitigation of nitrate leaching from soil amended with biosolids. Sci Total Environ 409:3206–3210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442Google Scholar
  24. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan in the UK, Dunstan House, London, EC1N 8XA, UK, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  25. Lehmann J, Schroth G (2002) Nutrient leaching. In: Schroth G, Sinclair FL (eds) Trees, crops and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 151–166Google Scholar
  26. Lehmann J, Pereira da Silva J, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357Google Scholar
  27. Li W, Johnson CE (2016) Relationships among pH, aluminum solubility and aluminum complexation with organic matter in acid forest soils of the Northeastern United States. Geoderma 271:234–242Google Scholar
  28. Li S, Zhang Y, Yan W, Shangguan Z (2018) Effect of biochar application method on nitrogen leaching and hydraulic conductivity in a silty clay soil. Soil Tillage Res 183:100–108Google Scholar
  29. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O'Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730Google Scholar
  30. Liu YX, Lyu HH, Shi Y, Wang YF, Zhong ZK, Yang SM (2015) Effects of biochar on soil nutrients leaching and potential mechanisms: a review. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 26:304–310Google Scholar
  31. Luu HM, Nguyen NH (2006) Effect of decomposed rice straw at different times on rice yield. Omonrice 14(14):58–63Google Scholar
  32. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2012) Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna Oxisol amended with biochar. J Environ Qual 41:1076–1086Google Scholar
  33. Mendes WC, Alves Júnior J, Cunha PCR, Silva AR, Evangelista AWP, Casaroli D (2016) Potassium leaching in different soils as a function of irrigation depths. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 20:972–977. Google Scholar
  34. Nguyen BT, Trinh NN, Le CMT, Nguyen TT, Tran TV, Thai BV, Le TV (2018) The interactive effects of biochar and cow manure on rice growth and selected properties of salt-affected soil. Arch Agron Soil 64:1744–1758Google Scholar
  35. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174:105–112Google Scholar
  36. Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, Martinsen V, Schmidt HP, Cornelissen G (2018) Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil. Sci Total Environ 625:1380–1389Google Scholar
  37. Parfitt RL, Giltrap DJ, Whitton JS (1995) Contribution of organic matter and clay minerals to the cation exchange capacity of soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26:1343–1355Google Scholar
  38. Patra BN, Mohanty SKJB, Fo S (1994) Effect of nutrients and liming on changes in pH, redox potential, and uptake of iron and manganese by wetland rice in iron-toxic soil. Biol Fertil Soil 17:285–288Google Scholar
  39. Qian L, Chen B (2014) Interactions of aluminum with biochars and oxidized biochars: implications for the biochar aging process. J Agric Food Chem 62:373–380Google Scholar
  40. Rosolem CA, Sgariboldi T, Garcia RA, Calonego JC (2010) Potassium leaching as affected by soil texture and residual fertilization in tropical soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1934–1943Google Scholar
  41. Shaul O (2002) Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg. Biometals 15:307–321Google Scholar
  42. Sika MP, Hardie AG (2014) Effect of pine wood biochar on ammonium nitrate leaching and availability in a South African sandy soil. Eur J Soil Sci 65:113–119Google Scholar
  43. Silva ICB, Basílio JJN, Fernandes LA, Colen F, Sampaio RA, Frazão LA (2017) Biochar from different residues on soil properties and common bean production. Sci Agric 74:378–382Google Scholar
  44. Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J Environ Qual 39:1224–1235Google Scholar
  45. Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manage 1:289–303Google Scholar
  46. Statista (2018) World rice acreage from 2008/2009 to 2015/2016 (in million hectares). Online asssesed June 2018; available at:
  47. Tahir S, Marschner P (2017) Clay addition to sandy soil reduces nutrient leaching—effect of clay concentration and ped size. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 48:1813–1821Google Scholar
  48. Teutscherova N, Houška J, Navas M, Masaguer A, Benito M, Vazquez E (2018) Leaching of ammonium and nitrate from Acrisol and Calcisol amended with holm oak biochar: a column study. Geoderma 323:136–145Google Scholar
  49. Venterink HO, Davidsson TE, Kiehl K, Leonardson L (2002) Impact of drying and re-wetting on N, P and K dynamics in a wetland soil. Plant Soil 243:119–130Google Scholar
  50. Vinten AJA, Vivian BJ, Wright F, Howard RS (1994) A comparative study of nitrate leaching from soils of differing textures under similar climatic and cropping conditions. J Hydrol 159:197–213Google Scholar
  51. Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu R, Zhang A, Yang S, Liu H, Zhou Y, Yang Z (2017) Biochar amendment reduces paddy soil nitrogen leaching but increases net global warming potential in Ningxia irrigation, China. Sci Rep 7:1592. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yao Y, Gao B, Zhang M, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 89:1467–1471Google Scholar
  53. Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing B (2013) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206:32–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Binh Thanh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Binh Trung Phan
    • 1
  • Tong Xuan Nguyen
    • 1
  • Vinh Ngoc Nguyen
    • 2
  • Thanh Van Tran
    • 3
  • Quang-Vu Bach
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science, Engineering, and ManagementIndustrial University of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Department of Environmental EngineeringInternational University - Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Department of Soil and FertilizerRubber Research Institute of VietnamBau BangVietnam
  4. 4.Sustainable Management of Natural Resources and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Environment and Labour SafetyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations