Advertisement

Effect of co-application of wood vinegar and biochar on seed germination and seedling growth

  • Xianxiang Luo
  • Zhengyang Wang
  • Kudakwashe Meki
  • Xiao Wang
  • Bingjie Liu
  • Hao ZhengEmail author
  • Xiangwei You
  • Fengmin Li
Technological Innovation for Soil/Sediment Remediation
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Food security is threatened by increasing soil degradation; thus, it is imperative to reclaim and amend the degraded soil. Multifunctional wood vinegar and biochar pyrolyzed from waste biomass are proposed as highly promising soil amendments. However, there is still a knowledge gap on the cooperative performance of wood vinegar and biochar in affecting plant growth in agricultural production.

Material and methods

Waste trunks of poplar-derived wood vinegar (PWV) and biochar (PBC) were produced using slow pyrolysis simultaneously at 500 °C for 5 h. Two common vegetables, pepper (Capsicum annuum Linn) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller), were selected to investigate their responses to PWV addition using a germination experiment and the individual and co-application of PWV and PBC using a 30-day pot experiment.

Results and discussion

The addition of PWV had no effects on the germination of pepper and tomato, while it promoted the lengths of the root and shoot at low concentrations (e.g., 0.002% and 0.02%). Additionally, PWV individually promoted the root development of pepper seedlings, such as the root length by 45.4–51.6%, and increased the biomass of the shoot and root by 20.9–22.0% and 100–113%, respectively; however, co-application showed little effects. For tomato, PWV individually exerted little influence on its growth, while PBC individually facilitated its seedling growth, including root development and aboveground and underground biomass production. Compared to the individual application of PWV, the co-application of PWV and PBC significantly increased the root length, surface area, and volume of tomato by 98.0%, 66.7%, and 83.1%, respectively. These results could attribute to the enhanced nutrient availability and the slow-released active acid and phenol components in PWV adsorbed by the PBC.

Conclusions

The individual application of PWV or PBC stimulated pepper seedling growth, whereas the co-application of PWV and PBC more efficiently stimulated tomato seedling growth than did the individual application. These findings provide valuable information on the co-application of wood vinegar and biochar to enhance crop growth, which is useful for improving soil health and food security.

Keywords

Biochar Combined effect Remediation Soil degradation Wood vinegar 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the Shandong Key Research and Development Program-Science and Technology Innovation Project (2018CXGC0304) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41573089).

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2365_MOESM1_ESM.docx (334 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 333 kb)

Referencesz

  1. Alfa MI, Adie DB, Igboro SB, Oranusi US, Dahunsi SO, Akali DM (2014) Assessment of biofertilizer quality and health implications of anaerobic digestion effluent of cow dung and chicken droppings. Renew Energy 63:681–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Safadi B, Elias R (2011) Improvement of caper (Capparis spinosa L.) propagation using in vitro culture and gamma irradiation. Sci Hortic 127(3):290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruun EW, Petersen CT, Hansen E, Holm JK, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2014) Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use Manag 30(1):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen J, Liu S, Kohler A, Yan B, Luo H, Chen X, Guo S (2017) iTRAQ and RNA-Seq analyses provide new insights into regulation mechanism of symbiotic germination of Dendrobium officinale seeds (Orchidaceae). J Proteome Res 16(6):2174–2187Google Scholar
  7. Chuaboon W, Ponghirantanachoke N, Athinuwat D (2016) Application of wood vinegar for fungal disease controls in paddy rice. App Envi Res 38(3):77–85Google Scholar
  8. Eigenbrod C, Gruda N (2015) Urban vegetable for food security in cities. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD (2004) A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 305:977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbs HK, Salmon JM (2015) Mapping the world's degraded lands. Appl Geogr 57:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammer EC, Forstreuter M, Rillig MC, Kohler J (2015) Biochar increases arbuscular mycorrhizal plant growth enhancement and ameliorates salinity stress. Appl Soil Ecol 96:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han Y, Boateng AA, Qi P, Lima IM, Chang J (2013) Heavy metal and phenol adsorptive properties of biochars from pyrolyzed switchgrass and woody biomass in correlation with surface properties. J Environ Manag 118:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobbie SE, Finlay JC, Janke BD, Nidzgorski DA, Millet DB, Baker LA (2017) Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:4177–4182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol. Biochem 45:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kadota M, Niimi Y (2004) Effects of charcoal with pyroligneous acid and barnyard manure on bedding plants. Sci Hortic 101:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kavitha B, Reddy PVL, Kim B, Lee SS, Pandey SK, Kim KH (2018) Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: a review. J Environ Manag 227:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koch A, McBratney A, Lal R (2012) Global soil week: put soil security on the global agenda. Nature 492:186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lashari MS, Liu Y, Li L, Pan W, Fu J, Pan G, Zheng J, Zheng J, Zhang X, Yu X (2013) Effects of amendment of biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution on soil quality and wheat yield of a salt-stressed cropland from Central China Great Plain. Food Crop Res 144:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li J, Pu L, Zhu M, Zhang J, Li P, Dai X, Xu Y, Liu L (2014) Evolution of soil properties following reclamation in coastal areas: a review. Geoderma 226:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li R, Tao R, Ling N, Chu G (2017) Chemical, organic and bio-fertilizer management practices effect on soil physicochemical property and antagonistic bacteria abundance of a cotton field: implications for soil biological quality. Soil Tillage Res 167:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Guo X, Wang S, Li L, Zeng Y, Liu G (2018) Effects of wood vinegar on properties and mechanism of heavy metal competitive adsorption on secondary fermentation based composts. Ecotox Environ Safe 150:270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu M, Wang Z, Chen L, Liu G, Zheng H (2016) Application of peanut shell and Chinese medicine mixed biochar as soil amendment to lead contaminated soil. Periodical of Ocean University of China 46(1):101–107Google Scholar
  24. Luo X, Liu G, Xia Y, Chen L, Jiang Z, Zheng H, Wang Z (2017) Use of biochar-compost to improve properties and productivity of the degraded coastal soil in the Yellow River Delta, China. J Soils Sediments 17(3):780–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopes C, Herva M, Franco-Uría A, Roca E (2011) Inventory of heavy metal content in organic waste applied as fertilizer in agriculture: evaluating the risk of transfer into the food chain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:918–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mmojieje J, Hornung A (2015) The potential application of pyroligneous acid in the UK agricultural industry. J Crop Improv 29:228–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mungkunkamchao T, Kesmala T, Pimratch S, Toomsan B, Jothityangkoon D (2013) Wood vinegar and fermented bioextracts: natural products to enhance growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sci Hortic 154:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olmo M, Alburquerque JA, Barrón V, Del Campillo MC, Gallardo A, Fuentes M, Villar R (2014) Wheat growth and yield responses to biochar addition under Mediterranean climate conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 50(8):1177–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pimentel D, Burgess M (2013) Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture 3(3):443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prendergast-Miller MT, Duvall M, Sohi SP (2014) Biochar-root interactions are mediated by biochar nutrient content and impacts on soil nutrient availability. Eur J Soil Sci 65:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahmat B, Pangesti D, Natawijaya D, Sufyadi D (2014) Generation of wood-waste vinegar and its effectiveness as a plant growth regulator and pest insect repellent. BioResources 9:6350–6360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Razaq M, Shen H, Sher HL, Sher H, Zhang P (2017) Influence of biochar and nitrogen on fine root morphology, physiology, and chemistry of Acer mono. Sci Rep 7(1):5367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rickson RJ, Deeks LK, Graves A, Harris JAH, Kibblewhite MG (2015) Input constraints to food production: the impact of soil degradation. Food Secur 7:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ríos-Reina R, Callejón RM, Oliver-Pozo C, Amigo JM, García-González DL (2017) ATR-FTIR as a potential tool for controlling high quality vinegar categories. Food Control 78:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruffel S, Krouk G, Ristova D, Shasha D, Birnbaum KD, Coruzzi GM (2011) Nitrogen economics of root foraging: transitive closure of the nitrate-cytokinin relay and distinct systemic signaling for N supply vs. demand. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:18524–18529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryals R, Silver WL (2013) Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecol Appl 23(1):46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma T, Dreyer I, Kochian L, Piñeros MA (2016) The ALMT family of organic acid transporters in plants and their involvement in detoxification and nutrient security. Front Plant Sci 7:1–12Google Scholar
  38. Simma B, Polthanee A, Goggi AS, Siri B, Promkhambut A, Caragea PC (2017) Wood vinegar seed priming improves yield and suppresses weeds in dryland direct-seeding rice under rainfed production. Agron Sustain Dev 37:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steiner C, Das KC, Garcia M, Förster B, Zech W (2008) Charcoal and smoke extract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia 51(5–6):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun R, Cheng G, Li Q, He Y, Wang Y, Lan Y, Li S, Zhu Y, Song W, Zhang X, Cui X, Chen W, Wang J (2017) Light-induced variation in phenolic compounds in cabernet sauvignon grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) involves extensive transcriptome reprogramming of biosynthetic enzymes, transcription factors, and phytohormonal regulators. Front Plant Sci 8:1–18Google Scholar
  41. Tasho RP, Cho JY (2016) Veterinary antibiotics in animal waste, its distribution in soil and uptake by plants: a review. Sci Total Environ 563–564:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vaccari FP, Maienza A, Miglietta F, Baronti S, Lonardo SD, Giagnoni L, Lagomarsino A, Pozzi A, Pusceddu E, Ranieri R, Valboa G, Genesio L (2015) Biochar stimulates plant growth but not fruit yield of processing tomato in a fertile soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 207:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang K, Brown RC, Homsy S, Martinez L, Sidhu SS (2013) Fast pyrolysis of microalgae remnants in a fluidized bed reactor for bio-oil and biochar production. Bioresour Technol 127:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Qiu L, Song Q, Wang S, Wang Y, Ge Y (2019) Root proteomics reveals the effects of wood vinegar on wheat growth and subsequent tolerance to drought stress. Int J Mol Sci 20(4):943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Z, Cao J, Wang J (2009) Pyrolytic characteristics of pine wood in a slowly heating and gas sweeping fixed-bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 84:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webb NP, Marshall NA, Stringer LC, Reed MS, Chappell A, Herrick JE (2017) Land degradation and climate change: building climate resilience in agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 15(8):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Win KT, Toyota K, Motobayashi T, Hosomi M (2009) Suppression of ammonia volatilization from a paddy soil fertilized with anaerobically digested cattle slurry by wood vinegar application and floodwater management. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 55(1):190–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang J, Yang C, Liang M, Gao Z, Wu Y, Chuang L (2016) Chemical composition, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity of wood vinegar from litchi chinensis. Molecules 21:1–10Google Scholar
  49. Zhang C, Xia X, Li B, Hung Y (2018) Disinfection efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water on brown rice soaking and germination. Food Control 89:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zheng H, Sun C, Hou X, Wu M, Yao Y, Li F (2018a) Pyrolysis of Arundo donax L. to produce pyrolytic vinegar and its effect on the growth of dinoflagellate Karenia brevis. Bioresour Technol 247:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zheng H, Wang X, Chen L, Wang Z, Xia Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Luo X, Xing B (2018b) Enhanced growth of halophyte plants in biochar-amended coastal soil: roles of nutrient availability and rhizosphere microbial modulation. Plant Cell Environ 41:517–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing B (2013a) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Zhao J, Luo Y, Novak J, Herbert S, Xing B (2013b) Characteristics and nutrient values of biochars produced from giant reed at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 130:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Coastal Environmental Pollution Control, Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of EducationOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Marine Agriculture Research Center, Tobacco Research InstituteChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations