Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp 3688–3698 | Cite as

Influence of individual and combined application of biochar, Bacillus megaterium, and phosphatase on phosphorus availability in calcareous soil

  • Xiangru Zhang
  • Haixiao Li
  • Meng Li
  • Guoqi Wen
  • Zhengyi HuEmail author
Soils, Sec 2 • Global Change, Environ Risk Assess, Sustainable Land Use • Research Article
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Phosphorus (P) in calcareous soil often needs to be replenished repeatedly. P-enriched biochar is expected to improve soil available P. However, the effect of acid biochar incorporated with other P activators on the P availability in calcareous soil is rarely reported.

Materials and methods

One soil incubation for 56 days was conducted to investigate the influence of individual application of acid biochar (B), phosphatase (E), Bacillus megaterium (M), and their combined application (BE, BM, EM, BEM) on soil P availability, based on analysis of Olsen-P, water-soluble P, P forms, acid phosphomonoesterase (AcP), alkaline phosphomonoesterase (AlP) activity, and pH after 7, 14, 28, and 56 days of incubation.

Results and discussion

Results indicated that individual application of B significantly increased soil Olsen-P and AcP compared with CK in the whole incubation period. Individual application of M significantly increased soil AcP and AlP on the 14th and 56th day of incubation, but decreased soil Olsen-P significantly in the whole incubation.

Conclusions

Individual application of B was the best measure for improving P availability in calcareous soil, followed by application of BM. But individual application of E or M was not recommended. Further investigations are required to investigate the influence of acid biochar on P availability in calcareous soil at the field scale.

Keywords

Acid biochar Liquid-state 31P-NMR spectroscopy Olsen-P Soil phosphorus activators Water-soluble P 

Notes

Funding information

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Project (No. 2016YFD0800100-04) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M601095).

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2338_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1294 kb)

References

  1. Abdi D, Cade-Menun BJ, Ziadi N, Parent LÉ (2015) Compositional statistical analysis of soil 31P-NMR forms. Geoderma 257-258:40–47Google Scholar
  2. Acosta-Martínez V, Tabatabai MA (2000) Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 31:85–91Google Scholar
  3. Beheshti M, Etesami H, Alikhani HA (2017) Interaction study of biochar with phosphate-solubilizing bacterium on phosphorus availability in calcareous soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:1572–1581Google Scholar
  4. Bolan NS (1991) A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil 134:189–207Google Scholar
  5. Bornø ML, Müller-Stöver DS, Liu F (2018) Contrasting effects of biochar on phosphorus dynamics and bioavailability in different soil types. Sci Total Environ 627:963–974Google Scholar
  6. Bünemann EK (2015) Assessment of gross and net mineralization rates of soil organic phosphorus – a review. Soil Biol Biochem 89:82–98Google Scholar
  7. Burns RG, Dick RP (2002) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology, and applications, vol 84. CRC Press, pp 106–107Google Scholar
  8. Cade-Menun BJ (2005) Characterizing phosphorus in environmental and agricultural samples by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Talanta 66:359–371Google Scholar
  9. Cade-Menun BJ (2015) Improved peak identification in 31P-NMR spectra of environmental samples with a standardized method and peak library. Geoderma 257-258:102–114Google Scholar
  10. Chintala R, Schumacher TE, McDonald LM, Clay DE, Malo DD, Papiernik SK, Clay SA, Julson JL (2014) Phosphorus sorption and availability from biochars and soil/biochar mixtures. Clean Soil Air Water 42:626–634Google Scholar
  11. Datta M, Banik S, Gupta RK (1982) Studies on the efficacy of a phytohormone producing phosphate solubilizing Bacillus firmus in augmenting paddy yield in acid soils of Nagaland. Plant Soil 69:365–373Google Scholar
  12. Deb D, Kloft M, Laessig J, Walsh S (2016) Variable effects of biochar and P solubilizing microbes on crop productivity in different soil conditions. Agroecol Sust Food 40:145–168Google Scholar
  13. Ding S, Xu D, Li B, Fan C, Zhang C (2010) Improvement of 31P NMR spectral resolution by 8-hydroxyquinoline precipitation of paramagnetic Fe and Mn in environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol 44:2555–2561Google Scholar
  14. El-Komy HMA (2005) Coimmobilization of Azospirillum lipoferum and Bacillus megaterium for successful phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition of wheat plants. Food Technol Biotechnol 43:19–27Google Scholar
  15. Elzobair KA, Stromberger ME, Ippolito JA (2016) Stabilizing effect of biochar on soil extracellular enzymes after a denaturing stress. Chemosphere 142:114–119Google Scholar
  16. Freitas JRD, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 24:358–364Google Scholar
  17. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, Sachdeva V, Deng H (2015) Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 206:46–59Google Scholar
  18. Heathwaite AL, Dils RM (2000) Characterising phosphorus loss in surface and subsurface hydrological pathways. Sci Total Environ 251:523–538Google Scholar
  19. Hively WD, Gerardmarchant P, Steenhuis TS (2006) Distributed hydrological modeling of total dissolved phosphorus transport in an agricultural landscape. II. Dissolved phosphorus transport. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2:1581–1612Google Scholar
  20. Hong C, Lu S (2018) Does biochar affect the availability and chemical fractionation of phosphate in soils? Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:8725–8734Google Scholar
  21. Ippolito JA, Ducey TF, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Lentz RD (2016) Designer, acidic biochar influences calcareous soil characteristics. Chemosphere 142:184–191Google Scholar
  22. Jin Y, Liang X, He M, Liu Y, Tian G, Shi J (2016) Manure biochar influence upon soil properties, phosphorus distribution and phosphatase activities: a microcosm incubation study. Chemosphere 142:128–135Google Scholar
  23. Jing Z, Chen R, Wei S, Lin X (2017) Biochar functions as phosphorous fertilizers in an alkaline alluvial soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 48:2455–2463Google Scholar
  24. Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J, Foidl N, Smernik RJ, Amonette JE (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Res 48:501–515Google Scholar
  25. Kahura MW, Min H, Kim MS, Kim JG (2018) Assessing phosphorus availability in a high pH, biochar amended soil under inorganic and organic fertilization. Ecol Resil Infrastruct 5:11–18Google Scholar
  26. Kirkby EA, Johnston AE (2008) Soil and fertilizer phosphorus in relation to crop nutrition. In: White PJ, Hammond JP (eds) The ecophysiology of plant-phosphorus interactions. Plant Ecophysiology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 177–223 Available from https://link-springer-com.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-8435-5_9 Google Scholar
  27. Li M, Mazzei P, Cozzolino V, Monda H, Hu Z, Piccolo A (2015) Optimized procedure for the determination of P species in soil by liquid-state 31P-NMR spectroscopy. Chem Biol Technol Agric 2:7Google Scholar
  28. Li M, Cozzolino V, Mazzei P, Drosos M, Monda H, Hu Z, Piccolo A (2017) Effects of microbial bioeffectors and P amendments on P forms in a maize cropped soil as evaluated by 31P–NMR spectroscopy. Plant Soil 414:1–18Google Scholar
  29. Liu S, Meng J, Jiang L, Yang X, Lan Y, Cheng X, Chen W (2017) Rice husk biochar impacts soil phosphorous availability, phosphatase activities and bacterial community characteristics in three different soil types. Appl Soil Ecol 116:12–22Google Scholar
  30. Lu R (1999) Analytical methods of soil and agricultural chemistry. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 109–110Google Scholar
  31. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36Google Scholar
  32. Naeem MA, Khalid M, Aon M, Abbas G, Tahir M, Amjad M, Murtaza B, Yang A, Akhtar SS (2017) Effect of wheat and rice straw biochar produced at different temperatures on maize growth and nutrient dynamics of a calcareous soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:2048–2061Google Scholar
  33. Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Othman R, Panhwar QA (2014) Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria improves nutrient uptake in aerobic rice. In: Khan M, Zaidi A, Musarrat J (eds) Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08216-5_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Owen D, Williams AP, Griffith GW, Withers PJA (2015) Use of commercial bio-inoculants to increase agricultural production through improved phosphorous acquisition. Appl Soil Ecol 86:41–54Google Scholar
  36. Purakayastha TJ, Kumari S, Pathak H (2015) Characterisation, stability, and microbial effects of four biochars produced from crop residues. Geoderma 239-240:293–303Google Scholar
  37. Rekasi M, Szili-Kovacs T, Takacs T, Bernhardt B, Puspan I, Kovacs R, Kutasi J, Draskovits E, Molnar S, Molnar M, Uzinger N (2019) Improving the fertility of sandy soils in the temperate region by combined biochar and microbial inoculant treatments. Arch Agron Soil Sci 65:44–57Google Scholar
  38. Roberts TL, Johnston AE (2015) Phosphorus use efficiency and management in agriculture. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:275–281Google Scholar
  39. Sahin O, Taskin MB, Kaya EC, Atakol O, Emir E, Inal A, Gunes A (2017) Effect of acid modification of biochar on nutrient availability and maize growth in a calcareous soil. Soil Use Manag 33:447–456Google Scholar
  40. Schneider F, Haderlein SB (2016) Potential effects of biochar on the availability of phosphorus - mechanistic insights. Geoderma 277:83–90Google Scholar
  41. Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2:587Google Scholar
  42. Shen SM (1998) Fertility of soil in China. Agriculture Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu G, Sun J, Shao H, Chang SX (2014) Biochar had effects on phosphorus sorption and desorption in three soils with differing acidity. Ecol Eng 62:54–60Google Scholar
  44. Yang J, Yuan L, Xu S, Zhu D, Yan N, Yuan Y, Liu D, Yang J (2010) Identification of a high phosphate-accumulating organisms and study of its polyphosphate characteristics, 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics & Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, pp 1–4. Available from  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5516450
  45. Zhai L, Cai Z, Liu J, Wang H, Ren T, Gai X, Xi B, Liu H (2015) Short-term effects of maize residue biochar on phosphorus availability in two soils with different phosphorus sorption capacities. Biol Fertil Soils 51:113–122Google Scholar
  46. Zhang H, Chen C, Gray EM, Boyd SE, Yang H, Zhang D (2016) Roles of biochar in improving phosphorus availability in soils: a phosphate adsorbent and a source of available phosphorus. Geoderma 276:1–6Google Scholar
  47. Zhu J, Li M, Whelan M (2018) Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a review. Sci Total Environ 612:522–537Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiangru Zhang
    • 1
  • Haixiao Li
    • 2
  • Meng Li
    • 3
  • Guoqi Wen
    • 1
  • Zhengyi Hu
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Environment Science and EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk AssessmentChinese Research Academy of Environmental SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations