Comparison of sampling designs for sediment source fingerprinting in an agricultural watershed in Atlantic Canada
Sediment fingerprinting is increasingly being used to improve the understanding of sediment dynamics within the critical zone and provide information that can help guide management decisions at the watershed scale. The objectives of this study were to investigate both the implications of different sediment fingerprinting sampling designs and spatial scales on the characterization of sediment dynamics in a predominantly agricultural watershed in northwestern New Brunswick, Canada.
Materials and methods
Color and radionuclide fingerprints were used to discriminate between three potential sediment sources: agricultural topsoil, agricultural streambanks, and forested areas (topsoil and streambanks). Suspended sediment was collected seasonally, between 2008 and 2014, at five sites with drainage areas ranging from 3.0 to 13.4 km2. Using the same source and sediment data set, multiple-, nested-, and local-location fingerprinting sampling designs were employed to investigate the influence of scale of observation, geomorphic connectivity, land use, and the heterogeneity of source fingerprints on apportionment results.
Results and discussion
Sediment collected in the headwaters was primarily derived from forested areas while the sediment collected at the outlet of the watershed was primarily from agricultural topsoil. When comparing the multiple- and nested-location designs, it was found that accounting for the spatial variability in the fingerprint properties of each source had a small difference in the sediment apportionment results. Furthermore, the local-location design demonstrated that the sediment collected at each location was composed of predominately local sources as opposed to upstream sediment entering the local catchment.
Assessment of the sources of sediment at a range of spatial scales better accounts for both geomorphic connectivity and differences in land use throughout the watershed. Overall, each of the three fingerprinting sampling designs provided different information that can be used to guide soil and water conservation management.
KeywordsAgriculture Sampling design Sediment fingerprinting Water quality
Assistance with laboratory analyses and fieldwork was provided by Serban Danielescu, Rick Allaby, Fangzhou Zheng, Zisheng Xing, Junyu Qi, Lionel Stevens, Sylvie Lavoie, John Monteith, Meagan Betts, Tegan Smith, Eva Slavicek, Yulia Kupriyanovich, and Brendon Brooks.
This work was supported by several synergy projects funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Major funding projects include, but not limited to, AAFC A-base projects #1538: “Reducing sediment, N and P loading from arable cropping systems to receiving waters in eastern Canada (PEI, NB, NS, QC)”, ECCC National Agri-Environmental Standards Initiative, and NSERC strategic project (STPGP 413426-2011): “Development of environmental fingerprinting techniques for sources of sediment and associated phosphorus within agricultural watersheds of Canada”.
- Barthod L, Liu K, Lobb DA, Owens PN, Martínez-Carreras N, Koiter AJ, Petticrew EL, McCullough GK, Cenwei L, Gaspar L (2015) Selecting color-based tracers and classifying sediment sources in the assessment of sediment dynamics using sediment source fingerprinting. J Environ Qual 44:1605–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chow TL, Xing Z, Ress HW (2009) Impacts of intensive potato production on water yield and sediment load. Final report (2004-2007) on watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices (WEBs) for black brook watershed. New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Weather Office. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/. Accessed 09 Aug 2018
- Habibiandehkord R, Lobb DA, Owens PN, Flaten DN (2019) Effectiveness of vegetated buffer strips in controlling legacy phosphorus exports from agricultural land. J Environ Qual 48:314–321. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.04.0129
- King DJ, Eilers RG, Grant BA, Lobb DA, Padbury GA, Rees HW, Shelton IJ, Wall GJ, Vliet LJP (2000) Risk of tillage erosion. In: McRae T, Smith S, Gregorich LJ (eds) Environmental health of Canadian agroecosystems. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, pp 77–83Google Scholar
- Koiter AJ, Lobb DA, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Li S, Tiessen KHD (2013a) Investigating the role of connectivity and scale in assessing the sources of sediment in an agricultural watershed in the Canadian prairies using sediment source fingerprinting. J Soils Sediments 13:1676–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Langmaid KK, MacMillan JK, Loiser JG (1976) Soils of northern Victoria County, New Brunswick. 7th report of the New Brunswick soil survey. Canada Department of Agriculture. Thron press ltd, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Langmaid KK, Losier JG, MacMillan JK (1980) Soils of Madawaska County, New Brunswick. 8th report of the New Brunswick soil survey. Canada Department of Agriculture. Thron press ltd, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Liu K, Lobb DA, Miller JJ, Owens PN, Caron ME (2018) Determining sources of fine-grained sediment for a reach of the lower little Bow River, Alberta, using a colour-based sediment fingerprinting approach. Can J Soil Sci 98:55–69Google Scholar
- Loucks OL (1962) A forest classification for the maritime provinces. Proc Nova Scotian Inst Sci 25:85–167Google Scholar
- Marshall IB, Schut PH, Ballard M (1999) A National Ecological Framework for Canada: attribute data. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Mellerowicz KT, Ress HW, Chow TL, Ghamem I (1993) Soils of the black brook watershed St. Andre parish, Madawaska County, New Brunswick. New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Oliver DM, Clegg CD, Heathwaite AL, Haygarth PM (2007) Preferential attachment of Escherichia coli to different particle size fractions of an agricultural grassland soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 185:369–375Google Scholar
- Owens PN, Blake WH, Gaspar L, Gateuille D, Koiter AJ, Lobb DA, Petticrew EL, Raiffarth D, Smith HG, Woodward JC (2016) Fingerprinting and tracing the sources of soils and sediments: earth and ocean sciences, geoarchaeological, forensic, and human health applications. Earth-Sci Rev 162:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
- RStudio Team (2016) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA http://www.rstudio.com/
- Venables WN, Ripley BD (2013) Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Weihs C, Ligges U, Luebke K, Raabe N (2005) klaR analyzing German business cycles. In: Baier D, Decker R, Schmidt-Thieme L (eds) Data analysis and decision support. Springer, Berlin, pp 335–343Google Scholar
- Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar