Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 2405–2416 | Cite as

Mutual relationships of biochar and soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations in a model laboratory experiment

  • Niguss Solomon Hailegnaw
  • Filip Mercl
  • Kateřina Pračke
  • Jiřina SzákováEmail author
  • Pavel Tlustoš
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

The majority of biochar studies use soils with only a narrow range of properties making generalizations about the effects of biochar on soils difficult. In this study, we aimed to identify soil properties that determine the performance of biochar produced at high temperature (700 °C) on soil pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and exchangeable base cation (Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+) content across a wide range of soil physicochemical properties.

Materials and methods

Ten distinct soils with varying physicochemical properties were incubated for 12 weeks with four rates of biochar application (0.5, 2, 4, and 8% w/w). Soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations (Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+) were determined on the 7th and 84th day of incubation.

Results and discussion

Our results indicate that the highest biochar application rate (8%) was more effective at altering soil properties than lower biochar rates. Application of 8% biochar increased pH significantly in all incubated soils, with the increment ranging up to 1.17 pH unit. Biochar induced both an increment and a decline in soil CEC ranging up to 35.4 and 7.9%, respectively, at a biochar application rate of 8%. Similarly, biochar induced increments in exchangeable Ca2+ up to 38.6% and declines up to 11.4%, at an 8% biochar application rate. The increment in CEC and exchangeable Ca2+ content was found in soils with lower starting exchangeable Ca2+ contents than the biochar added, while decreases were observed in soils with higher exchangeable Ca2+ contents than the biochar. The original pH, CEC, exchangeable Ca2+, and texture of the soils represented the most crucial factors for determining the amount of change in soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable Ca2+ content.

Conclusions

Our findings clearly demonstrate that application of a uniform biochar to a range of soils under equivalent environmental conditions induced two contradicting effects on soil properties including soil CEC and exchangeable Ca2+ content. Therefore, knowledge of both biochar and soil properties will substantially improve prediction of biochar application efficiency to improve soil properties. Among important soil properties, soil exchangeable Ca2+ content is the primary factor controlling the direction of biochar-induced change in soil CEC and exchangeable Ca2+ content. Generally, biochar can induce changes in soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable Ca2+, K+, and Mg2+ with the effectiveness and magnitude of change closely related to the soil’s original properties.

Keywords

Biochar CEC Exchangeable base cations (Ca2+, K+, Mg2+pH 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hana Zámečníková and Zlata Holečková for their analyses of the samples. We would also like to extend our appreciation to all departmental members of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, for their unlimited suggestions and kindness to cooperate. Correction and improvement of language was provided by Proof-Reading-Service.com Ltd. Devonshire Business Centre, Works Road, Letchworth Garden City, SG6 1GJ, UK.

Funding information

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund—Project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000845; the Czech Ministry of Agriculture (QK1710379); the Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (CIGA 20172015); and the Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (CIGA 21140/1313/3141).

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2264_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. Al-Wabel MI, Hussain Q, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS (2018) Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: a review. Land Degrad Dev 29:124–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai XF, Zhou XQ, Li ZF, Ni JW, Bai X (2017) Properties and applications of biochars derived from different biomass feedstock sources. Int J Agric Biol Eng 10:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berek AK (2014) Exploring the potential roles of biochars on land degradation mitigation. J Degraded Min Lands Manag 1:149–158Google Scholar
  4. Chathurika JAS, Kumaragamage D, Zvomuya F, Akinremi OO, Flaten DN, Indraratne SP, Dandeniya WS (2016) Woodchip biochar with or without synthetic fertilizers affects soil properties and available phosphorus in two alkaline, chernozemic soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 96:472–484Google Scholar
  5. Chintala R, Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Malo DD, Julson JL (2014) Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clough A, Skjemstad JO (2000) Physical and chemical protection of soil organic carbon in three agricultural soils with different contents of calcium carbonate. Soil Res 38:1005–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornelissen G, Jubaedah, Nurida NL, Hale SE, Martinsen V, Silvani L, Mulder J (2018) Fading positive effect of biochar on crop yield and soil acidity during five growth seasons in an Indonesian Ultisol. Sci Total Environ 634:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Naggar AH, Usman AR, Al-Omran A, Ok YS, Ahmad M, Al-Wabel MI (2015) Carbon mineralization and nutrient availability in calcareous sandy soils amended with woody waste biochar. Chemosphere 138:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agron J 102:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillman GP (1979) A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of highly weathered soils. Soil Res 17:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser B, Guggenberger G, Zech W, Ruivo MDL (2003) Soil organic matter stability in Amazonian Dark Earths. In: Amazonian Dark Earths. Springer, pp 141–158Google Scholar
  13. Gul S, Whalen JK, Thomas BW, Sachdeva V, Deng H (2015) Physico-chemical properties and microbial responses in biochar-amended soils: mechanisms and future directions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 206:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilioti Z, Michailof CM, Valasiadis D, Iliopoulou EF, Koidou V, Lappas AA (2017) Characterization of castor plant-derived biochars and their effects as soil amendments on seedlings. Biomass Bioenergy 105:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jien SH, Wang CS (2013) Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones JB Jr (2012) Plant nutrition and soil fertility manual. CRC Press, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kameyama K, Iwata Y, Miyamoto T (2017) Biochar amendment of soils according to their physicochemical properties. JARQ-Jap Agric Res Quart 51:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kongthod T, Thanachit S, Anusontpornperm S, Wiriyakitnateekul W (2015) Effects of biochars and other organic soil amendments on plant nutrient availability in an Ustoxic Quartzipsamment. Pedosphere 25:790–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kwon S, Pignatello JJ (2005) Effect of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): pseudo pore blockage by model lipid components and its implications for N2-probed surface properties of natural sorbents. Environ Sci Technol 39:7932–7939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li S, Barreto V, Li R, Chen G, Hsieh YP (2018) Nitrogen retention of biochar derived from different feedstocks at variable pyrolysis temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 133:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mandal S, Donner E, Vasileiadis S, Skinner W, Smith E, Lombi E (2018) The effect of biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and application rate on the reduction of ammonia volatilisation from biochar-amended soil. Sci Total Environ 627:942–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martinsen V, Mulder J, Shitumbanuma V, Sparrevik M, Børresen T, Cornelissen G (2014) Farmer-led maize biochar trials: effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:681–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinsen V, Alling V, Nurida NL, Mulder J, Hale SE, Ritz C, Rutherford DW, Heikens A, Breedveld GD, Cornelissen G (2015) pH effects of the addition of three biochars to acidic Indonesian mineral soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61:821–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masud MM, Li JY, Xu RK (2014) Use of alkaline slag and crop residue biochars to promote base saturation and reduce acidity of an acidic Ultisol. Pedosphere 24:791–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matthews BC, Sherrell CG (1960) Effect of drying on exchangeable potassium of Ontario soils and the relation of exchangeable potassium to c 35 rop yield. Can J Soil Sci 40:–41Google Scholar
  28. Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, Martinsen V, Schmidt HP, Cornelissen G (2018) Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil. Sci Total Environ 625:1380–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pignatello JJ, Kwon S, Lu Y (2006) Effect of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): attenuation of surface activity by humic and fulvic acids. Environ Sci Technol 40:7757–7763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prommer J, Wanek W, Hofhansl F, Trojan D, Offre P, Urich T, Schleper C, Sassmann S, Kitzler B, Soja G, Hood-Nowotny RC (2014) Biochar decelerates soil organic nitrogen cycling but stimulates soil nitrification in a temperate arable field trial. PLoS One 9:e86388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen YH (1999) Sorption of natural dissolved organic matter on soil. Chemosphere 38:1505–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82Google Scholar
  33. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry. Academic Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trakal L, Veselská V, Šafařík I, Vítková M, Číhalová S, Komárek M (2016) Lead and cadmium sorption mechanisms on magnetically modified biochars. Bioresour Technol 203:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang L, Butterly CR, Wang Y, Herath HMSK, Xi YG, Xiao XJ (2014) Effect of crop residue biochar on soil acidity amelioration in strongly acidic tea garden soils. Soil Use Manag 30:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu H, Yip K, Kong Z, Li CZ, Liu D, Yu Y, Gao X (2011) Removal and recycling of inherent inorganic nutrient species in mallee biomass and derived biochars by water leaching. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:12143–12151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu G, Wei LL, Sun JN, Shao HB, Chang SX (2013) What is more important for enhancing nutrient bioavailability with biochar application into a sandy soil: direct or indirect mechanism? Ecol Eng 52:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang C, Liu L, Zhao M, Rong H, Xu Y (2018) The environmental characteristics and applications of biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:21525–21534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zornoza R, Moreno-Barriga F, Acosta JA, Muñoz MA, Faz A (2016) Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere 144:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural ResourcesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePrague 6 - SuchdolCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations