Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 2381–2392 | Cite as

Biochar induced Pb and Cu immobilization, phytoavailability attenuation in Chinese cabbage, and improved biochemical properties in naturally co-contaminated soil

  • Abdus Salam
  • Saqib Bashir
  • Imran Khan
  • Qaiser Hussain
  • Ruili Gao
  • Hongqing HuEmail author
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Contamination of agricultural soils with potential toxic elements (PTEs) has caused serious health and environmental concern all over the world. Therefore, eco-friendly solutions for Pb and Cu immobilization were required to minimize their mobility through various types of biochar amendments in contaminated soil.

Materials and methods

A greenhouse pot study was conducted to evaluate the comparative effect of rapeseed residue (RP), and rice straw (RS)-derived biochars, produced at different temperatures on Pb and Cu mobility and their accumulation in a high metal accumulating crop such as Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L.). Sequential extraction, leaching toxicity, and phytoavailability techniques were used to assess Pb and Cu mobility. The impacts of various types of biochars on soil surface electronegative charge and soil enzymatic activity were also investigated in contaminated soil.

Results and discussion

The sequential extraction results revealed that the application of 5% of high-temperature rice straw biochar (RS550) and rapeseed residue biochar (RP550) significantly reduced the acid-soluble fractions (active fractions) of Pb and Cu by 53.50 and 50.35% respectively. Following the addition of 5% RS550, the residual fraction (stable fractions) of Pb and Cu were increased by 36.14 and 50.94% respectively. A remarkable decrease in Pb and Cu phytoavailability and solubility was observed after the soil was treated with 5% of both RS550 and RP550 biochars. In all biochar treatments, the maximum reduction of Pb concentration in roots and shoots of the cabbage was 37.81 and 26.54%, respectively, while the concentration of Cu decreased by 50.41 and 46.25%, respectively. Incorporation of biochar into contaminated soils also improved soil urease, catalase, and acid phosphatase activities as compared to the control soil.

Conclusions

Biochar application greatly enhanced the Pb and Cu immobilization, reduced phytoavailability to Chinese cabbage, and improved soil enzymes activity. The significant increment in soil surface electronegative charges and soil pH after biochar incorporation was considered one of the Pb and Cu immobilization mechanisms. Overall, application of rice straw biochar produced at 550 °C could potentially be a safe, efficient, and sustainable approach to stabilize Pb and Cu and restore soil functions in contaminated soil.

Keywords

Biochar Chinese cabbage Cu Immobilization Pb Soil enzymes 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41371470), and National Sci-Tech Support Plan (2015BAD05B02).

Supplementary material

11368_2019_2250_MOESM1_ESM.docx (713 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 712 kb)

References

  1. Acosta-Martínez V, Tabatabai MA (2000) Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils 31:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J, Bolan NS (2004) Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 122:121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad M, Ok YS, Rajapakshaa AU, Lim JE, Kim B, Ahn J, Lee YH, Al-Wabel M, Lee S, Lee SS (2016) Lead and copper immobilization in a shooting range soil using soybean stover and pine needle-derived biochars: chemical, microbial and spectroscopic assessments. J Hazard Mater 301:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2017) Biochar-induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 17:717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1989) Standard methods for chemical analysis of wood charcoal, ASTM D1762–84. ASTM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Smith JL, Bolton H (2011) Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biol Biochem 43:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bashir S, Shaaban M, Hussain Q, Mehmood S, Zhu J, Fu Q, Aziz O, Hu H (2018a) Influence of organic and inorganic passivators on Cd and Pb stabilization and microbial biomass in a contaminated paddy soil. J Soils Sediments 18:2948–2959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bashir S, Hussain Q, Akmal M, Riaz M, Hu HQ, Ijaz SS, Iqbal M, Abro S, Mehmood S, Ahmad M (2018b) Sugarcane bagasse derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 18:874–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bashir S, Hussain Q, Shaabn M, Hu H (2018c) Efficiency and surface characterization of different plant derived biochar for cadmium (Cd) mobility, bioaccessibility and bioavailability to Chinese cabbage in highly contaminated soil. Chemosphere 211:632–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolan NS, Naidu R, Syers JK, Tillman RW (1999) Surface charge and solute interactions in soils. Adv Agron 67:87–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60514-3
  11. Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W (2009) Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ Sci Technol 43:3285–3291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cely P, Gascó G, Ferreiro P, Méndez JA (2015) Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 111:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen J, Liu X, Zheng J, Zhang B, Lu H, Chi Z, Pan G, Li L, Zheng J, Zhang X, Wang J, Yu X (2013) Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 71:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cui L, Genxing P, Lianqing L, Jinlong Y, Afeng Z, Rongjun Z, Andrew C (2013) The reduction wheat Cd uptake in contaminated soil via biochar amendments: a two to three year experiment. Bioresource 7:5666–5676Google Scholar
  15. Dempster DN, Gleeson DB, Solaiman ZM, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with Eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant Soil 354:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. El-Naggar AE, Shaheen SM, Ok YS, Rinklebe J (2018) Biochar affects the dissolved and colloidal concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn and their phytoavailability and potential mobility in a mining soil under dynamic redox-conditions. Sci Total Environ 624:1059–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Rinklebe J, Farooq M, Song H, Sarmahh AK, Zimmermani AR, Ahmad M, Shaheen SM, Ok YS (2019) Biochar application to low fertility soils: a review of current status, and future prospects. Geoderma 337:536–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83:1262–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinojosa MB, Carreira JA, García-Ruiz R, Dick RP (2004) Soil moisture pretreatment effects on enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal contaminated and reclaimed soils. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1559–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013) Mobility, bioavailability and pH dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 92:1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hussain M, Farooq M, Nawaz A, Al-Sadi AM, Solaiman ZM, Alghamdi SS, Ammara U, Ok YS, Siddique KHM (2017) Biochar for crop production: potential benefits and risks. J Soils Sediments 17:685–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang J, Xu R, Jiang TY, Li Z (2012) Immobilization of Cu(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) by the addition of rice straw derived biochar to a simulated polluted Ultisol. J Hazard Mater 229:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kandeler E, Gerber H (1988) Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 6:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim SH, Kim KR, Kim JH, Yoon HJ, Yang EJ, Ok SY, Owens G, Kim HK (2015) Effect of biochar on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in agricultural soil. Environ Earth Sci 74:1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liang Y, Cao X, Zhao L, Arellano E (2014) Biochar and phosphate induced immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soil and water: implication on simultaneous remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4665–4674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu K, Yang X, Shen J, Robinson B, Huang H, Liu D, Bolan N, Pei J, Wang H (2014) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn to Sedum plumbizincicola. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, Bolan N, Ok SY, Niazi KN, Xu S, Yuan G, Chen X, Zhang X, Liu D, Song Z, Liu X, Wang H (2017) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil. J Environ Manag 186:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manya JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46:7939–7954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Masto RE, Kumar S, Rout TK, Sarkar P, George J, Ram LC (2013) Biochar from water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) and its impact on soil biological activity. Catena 111:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohamed I, Zhang G, Li Z, Liu Y, Chen F, Dai K (2015) Ecological restoration of an acidic Cd contaminated soil using bamboo biochar application. Ecol Eng 84:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naidu R, Syers J, Tillman R, Kirkman J (1990) Effect of liming and added phosphate on charge characteristics of acid soils. J Soil Sci 41:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouyang L, Tang Q, Yu L, Zhang R (2014) Effects of amendment of different biochars on soil enzyme activities related to carbon mineralization. Soil Res 52:706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Papa S, Bartoli G, Pellegrino A, Fioretto A (2010) Microbial activities and trace element contents in an urban soil. Environ Monit Assess 165:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T (2011a) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348:439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park JH, Lamb D, Paneerselvam P, Choppala G, Bolan N, Chung J (2011b) Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (oid) contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 185:549–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Puga AP, Abreu CA, Melo LCA, Beesley L (2015) Biochar application to a contaminated soil reduces the availability and plant uptake of zinc, lead and cadmium. J Environ Manag 159:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM, Frohne T (2016) Amendment of biochar reduces the release of toxic elements under dynamic redox conditions in a contaminated floodplain soil. Chemosphere 142:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rizwan M, Ali S, Adrees M, Rizvi H, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Hannan F, Qayyum MF, Hafeez F, Ok YS (2016) Cadmium stress in rice: toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and management: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:17859–17879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salam A, Bashir S, Khan I, Hussain Q, Ruili G, Hu H (2018) Biochars immobilize lead and copper in naturally contaminated soil. Environ Eng Sci 35(12):1349–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0086
  41. Shaheen MS, Balbaa AA, Khatab MA, Rinklebe J (2017) Compost and sulfur affect the mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd and Ni to sorghum and barnyard grass in a spiked fluvial soil. Environ Geochem Health 39:1305–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skłodowski P, Maciejewska A, Kwiatkowska J (2006). The effect of organic matter from brown coal on bioavailability of heavy metals in contaminated sioil. In: Twardowska I, Allen HE, Häggblom MM, Stefaniak S (eds) Soil and Water Pollution Monitoring, Protection and Remediation. NATO Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht, 69:299–307Google Scholar
  43. Soil Science Society of China (SSSC) (1999) Analysis methods for soil and agricultural chemistry. China Science and Technology Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  44. Spiers GA, McGill WB (1979) Effects of phosphorus addition and energy supply on acid phosphatase production and activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 11:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Klasson KT, Wartelle LH (2010) Contaminant immobilization and release by biochar soil amendment: roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 80:935–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uchimiya M, Chang S, Klasson KT (2011) Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: role of oxygen functional groups. J Hazard Mater 190:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. USEPA (1992) Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), method 1311. Publication SW 846: test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. Available at: www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/1311.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
  49. Wang Y, Shi J, Lin Q, Chen X, Chen Y (2007) Heavy metal availability and impact on activity of soil microorganisms along a Cu/Zn contamination gradient. J Environ Sci 19:848–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu GH, Zheng HY (1986) Handbook of analysis of soil microorganisms. Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  51. Yang X, Liu J, McGrouther K, Huang H, Lu K, Guo X, He L, Lin X, Che L, Ye Z, Wang H (2016) Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:974–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yuan J, Xu R, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdus Salam
    • 1
  • Saqib Bashir
    • 1
    • 2
  • Imran Khan
    • 1
  • Qaiser Hussain
    • 3
  • Ruili Gao
    • 1
  • Hongqing Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtse River), Ministry of Agriculture, College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department Soil & Environmental ScienceGhazi UniversityDG KhanPakistan
  3. 3.Department Soil Science & SWCPMAS-Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations