Advertisement

Assessment of lead and beryllium sorption to exposed stream channel sediment under varying freshwater channel conditions

  • Ethan D. PawlowskiEmail author
  • Diana L. Karwan
Sediment Fingerprinting in the Critical Zone
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Beryllium (Be) and lead (Pb) sorption is important to the utility of the radioisotopes of these elements for sediment fingerprinting. This paper examines the sorption of Be and Pb exposed to fluvial sediment under varying chemical conditions representative of freshwater streams draining two distinct Critical Zone environments in the eastern United States: the mid-Atlantic piedmont and heavily glaciated Great Lakes region.

Materials and methods

Batch experiments were completed using well-characterized in-stream deposit sediments collected from these two systems and varying solutions to reflect background and elevated levels of iron oxide in the form of goethite across times ranging from 0.25 to 360 h. The mid-Atlantic piedmont sediment had further treatments testing dissolved organic carbon and increased sediment to solution ratio effects on Pb and Be sorption.

Results and discussion

Beryllium partition coefficients (Kd) ranged from a log Kd of 1.46 to 3.48 L kg−1 and Pb ranged from 0 to 5.03 L kg−1 across all treatments displaying several noticeable patterns. Two-stage sorption was observed such that sorption increased over time across all treatments and substrates. Goethite additions either enhanced or reduced sorption relative to the unaltered treatment depending on the original sediment and mixing time. Lead sorption with the addition of 100 mg of goethite increased during shorter mixing times before being surpassed by the unaltered, or base, treatment at longer mixing times for both the mid-Atlantic piedmont and glaciated Great Lakes sediment. Beryllium sorption was increased with the mid-Atlantic piedmont sediment whereas it was primarily decreased with the glaciated Great Lakes sediment. The 1 mg of goethite generally showed equal to or slightly enhanced sorption relative to the base setup of both Pb and Be with the exception of Pb sorption to the Great Lakes sediment. The highest DOC concentration tested of 11.86 mg L−1 retained a greater amount of Be and Pb in solution compared to other treatments after 360 h. Increasing the sediment to solution ratio showed decreased partition coefficients across all analogous times for Be compared to the base treatment whereas Pb sorption surpassed the unaltered treatment after 24 h.

Conclusions

These results suggest that fluvial sediment mineralogy, organic matter concentration, and biogeochemical cycling of common stream chemical constituents may play a role in the mobilization or retention of these two trace metals and alter their utility for sediment fingerprinting.

Keywords

Beryllium Lead Sediment Sorption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the field and laboratory assistance that brought this work to fruition in particular from Dr. Stephen Sebestyen, Dr. Kyungsoo Yoo, Dr. Katherine Skalak, Adam Benthem, Dr. James Pizzuto, and many others.

Funding information

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation in grant EAR 1424147, the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, and by the University of Minnesota. Parts of this work were carried out in the Characterization Facility, University of Minnesota, which receives partial support from NSF through the MRSEC program. ICP-MS measurements were performed at the Yale Analytical and Stable Isotope Center (YASIC), a Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies (YIBS) research center.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aldahan A, Haiping Y, Possnert G (1998) Distribution of beryllium between solution and minerals (biotite and albite) under atmospheric conditions and variable pH. Chem Geol 156:209–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkian F, Meshkatee AH, Bidokhti AA (2010) The effects of large-scale atmospheric flows on beryllium-7 activity concentration in surface air. Environ Monit Assess 168:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson CA, Jolley DF, Simpson SL (2007) Effect of overlying water pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity and sediment disturbances on metal release and sequestration from metal contaminated marine sediments. Chemosphere 69:1428–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belmont P, Gran KB, Schottler SP, Wilcock PR, Day SS, Jennings C, Lauer JW, Viparelli E, Willenbring JK, Engstrom DR, Parker G (2011) Large shift in source of fine sediment in the upper Mississippi River. Environ Sci Technol 45:8804–8810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belmont P, Willenbring JK, Schottler SP, Marquard J, Kumarasamy K, Hemmis JM (2014) Toward generalizable sediment fingerprinting with tracers that are conservative and nonconservative over sediment routing timescales. J Soils Sediments 14:1479–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benoit G, Rozan TF (1999) The influence of size distribution on the particle concentration effect and trace metal partitioning in rivers. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63(1):113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake WH, Wallbrink PJ, Wilkinson SN, Humphreys GS, Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Tomkins KM (2009) Deriving hillslope sediment budgets in wildfire-affected forests using fallout radionuclide tracers. Geomorphology 104:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschi V, Willenbring JK (2016) The effect of pH, organic ligand chemistry and mineralogy on the sorption of beryllium over time. Environ Chem 13:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brezonik PL, Bloom PR, Sleighter RL, Cory RM, Khwaja AR, Hatcher PG (2015) Chemical differences of aquatic humic substances extracted by XAD-8 and DEAE-cellulose. J Environ Chem Eng 3:2982–2990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caille N, Tiffreau C, Leyval C, Morel JL (2003) Solubility of metals in an anoxic sediment during prolonged aeration. Sci Total Environ 301:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantwell MG, Burgess RM, Kester DR (2002) Release and phase partitioning of metals from anoxic estuarine sediments during periods of simulated resuspension. Environ Sci Technol 36(24):5328–5334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cappuyns V, Swennen R, Deviver A (2006) Dredged river sediments: potential chemical time bombs? A case study. Water Air Soil Pollut 171:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (1997) Sediment sources in the Upper Severn catchment: a fingerprinting approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1(3):509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis JA, Leckie JO (1978) Effect of adsorbed complexing ligands on trace metal uptake by hydrous oxides. Environ Sci Technol 12(12):1309–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Degryse F, Smolders E, Parker DR (2009) Partitioning of metals (Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) in soils: concepts, methodologies, prediction and applications—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 60:590–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Nanno MP, Curutchet G, Ratto S (2007) Anaerobic sediment potential acidification and metal release risk assessment by chemical characterization and batch resuspension experiments. J Soils Sediments 7:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diamond HJ, Karl TR, Palecki MA et al (2013) U.S. Climate Reference Network after one decade of operations: status and assessment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drake AA, Morgan BA (1981) The piney branch complex—a metamorphosed fragment of the central Appalachian ophiolite in northern Virginia. Am J Sci 281:484–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Du YJ, Hayashi S (2005) Investigation on some factors controlling the sorption of heavy metals on ariake clay. Lowland Technol Int 7:43–49Google Scholar
  21. Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack FMG (2008) Trace metal behavior in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:3972–3985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Du Laing G, Meers E, Dewispelaere M, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Verloo MG, Tack FMG (2009) Effect of water table level on metal mobility at different depths in wetland soils of the Scheldt Estuary (Belgium). Water Air Soil Pollut 202:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duenas C, Fernandez MC, Carretero J, Liger E, Canete S (2004) Long-term variation of the concentrations of long-lived Rn descendants and cosmogenic 7Be and determination of the MRT of aerosols. Atmos Environ 38:1291–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandez JSC, Sordo J (2006) Lead: chemistry, analytical aspects, environmental impact and health effects, 1st edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Gault AG, Langley S, Ibrahim A, Renaud R, Takahashi Y, Boothman C, Lloyd JR, Clark ID, Ferris FG, Fortin D (2012) Seasonal changes in mineralogy, geochemistry and microbial community of bacteriogenic iron oxides (BIOS) deposited in circumneutral wetland. Geomicrobiol J 29:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gellis A, Fitzpatrick F, Schubauer-Berigan J (2016) A manual to identify sources of fluvial sediment. EPA/600/R-16/210. U.S. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Gellis AC, Fuller CC, Van Metre PC (2017) Sources and ages of fine-grained sediment to streams using fallout radionuclides in the Midwestern United States. J Environ Manag 194:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerringa LJA (1990) Aerobic degradation of organic matter and the mobility of Cu, Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn, Fe and Mn in marine sediment slurries. Mar Chem 29:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerristse RG, Van Driel W (1984) The relationship between adsorption of trace metals, organic matter, and pH in temperate soils. J Environ Qual 13:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grybos M, Davranche M, Gruau G, Petitjean P (2007) Is trace metal release in wetland soils controlled by organic matter mobility or Fe-oxyhydroxides reduction? J Colloid Interface Sci 314:490–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gustafsson JP, Tiberg C, Edkymish A, Kleja DB (2011) Modelling lead(II) sorption to ferrihydrite and soil organic matter. Environ Chem 8:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hegler F, Losekann-Behrens T, Hanselmann K, Behrens S, Kappler A (2012) Influence of seasonal and geochemical changes on the geomicrobiology of an iron carbonate mineral water spring. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(20):7185–7196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu M, Morsali A, Aboutorabi L (2011) Lead(II) carboxylate supramolecular compounds: coordination modes, structures and non-structures aspects. Coord Chem Rev 255:2821–2859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huisman NLH, Karthikeyan KG (2012) Using radiometric tools to track sediment and phosphorus movement in an agricultural watershed. J Hydrol 450-451:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hupp CR, Noe GB, Schenk ER, Benthem AJ (2013) Recent and historic sediment dynamics along Difficult Run, a suburban Virginia Piedmont stream. Geomorphology 180-181:156–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hwang K-Y, Kim H-S, Hwang I (2011) Effect of resuspension on the release of heavy metals and water chemistry in anoxic and oxic sediments. Clean Soil Air Water 39:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Itoh H, Narazaki Y (2017) Meterological notes for understanding the transport of beryllium-7 in the troposphere. Jpn J Health Phys 52:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karwan DL, Pizzuto JE, Aalto R, Marquard J, Harpold A, Skalak K, Benthem A, Levia DF, Siegert CM, Aufdenkampe AK (2018) Direct channel precipitation and storm characteristics influence short-term fallout radionuclide assessment of sediment source. Water Resour Res 54:4579–4594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaste JM, Norton SA, Hess CT (2002) Environmental chemistry of beryllium-7. Rev Mineral Geochem 50:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaste JM, Magilligan FJ, Renshaw CE, Fisher GB, Dade WB (2014) Seasonal controls on meteoric beryllium-7 in coarse-grained river channels. Hydrol Process 28:2738–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koch D (1998) Beryllium 10/beryllium 7 as a tracer of stratospheric transport. J Geophys Res 103(D4):3907–3917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koiter AJ, Owens PN, Petticrew EL, Lobb DA (2013) The behavioural characteristics of sediment properties and their implications for sediment fingerprinting as an approach for identifying sediment sources in river basins. Earth-Sci Rev 125:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kosmulski M, Maczka E, Jartych E, Rosenholm JB (2003) Synthesis and characterization of goethite and goethite-hematite composite: experimental study and literature survey. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 103:57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krmar M, Mihailovic DT, Arsenic L, Radnovic D, Pap I (2016) Beryllium-7 and 210Pb atmospheric deposition measured in moss and dependence on cumulative precipitation. Sci Total Environ 541:941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lang F, Kaupenjohann M (2003) Immobilisation of molybdate by iron oxides: effects of organic coatings. Geoderma 113:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu G, Yang M, Warrington D, Liu P, Tian J (2011) Using beryllium-7 to monitor the relative proportions of interrill and rill erosion from loessal soil slopes in a single rainfall event. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lusardi BA, Dengler EL (1994/2017) Minnesota at a glance. Minnesota Geological Survey, Saint PaulGoogle Scholar
  48. Mabit L, Benmansour M, Walling DE (2008) Comparative advantages and limitations of the fallout radionuclides 137 Cs, 210 Pbex and 7 Be for assessing soil erosion and sedimentation. J Environ Radioact 99:1799–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mabit L, Benmansour M, Abril JM, Walling DE, Meusburger K, Iurian AR, Bernard C, Tarjan S, Owens PN, Blake WH, Alewell C (2014) Fallout 210Pb as a soil and sediment tracer in catchment sediment budget investigations: a review. Earth-Sci Rev 138:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matisoff G, Bonniwell EC, Whiting PJ (2002) Soil erosion and sediment sources in an Ohio watershed using beryllium-7, cesium-137, and lead-210. J Environ Qual 31:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matisoff G, Wilson CG, Whiting PJ (2005) The7Be/210Pbxs ratio as an indicator of suspended sediment age or fraction new sediment in suspension. Earth Surf Process Landf 30:1191–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McDonnell JJ (2014) The two water worlds hypothesis: ecohydrological separation of water between streams and trees?. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 1(4):323–329Google Scholar
  53. McKenzie RM (1980) The adsorption of lead and other heavy metals on oxides of manganese and iron. Aust J Soil Res 18:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McKinley JP, Jenne EA (1991) Experimental investigation and review of the “solids concentration” effect in adsorption studies. Environ Sci Technol 25:2082–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Monnin L, Ciffroy P, Garnier JM, Ambrosi JP, Radakovitch O (2018) Remobilization of trace metals during laboratory resuspension of contaminated sediments from a dam reservoir. J Soils Sediments 18:2596–2613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy EM, Zachara JM, Smith SC, Phillips JL (1992) The sorption of humic acids to mineral surfaces and their role in contaminant binding. Sci Total Environ 117/118:413–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development) (2000): OECD-guideline for testing of chemicals 106: adsorption/desorption, pp 1–45Google Scholar
  58. Ohkouchi N, Ogawa NO, Chikaraishi Y, Tanaka H, Wada E (2015) Biochemical and physiological bases for the use of carbon and nitrogen isotopes in environmental and ecological studies. Prog Earth Planet Sci 2(1)Google Scholar
  59. Powell KJ, Brown PL, Byrne RH, Gajda T, Hefter G, Leuz AK, Sjöberg S, Wanner H (2009) Chemical speciation of environmentally significant metals with inorganic ligands. Part 3: the Pb2+ + OH, Cl, CO3 2−, SO4 2−, and PO4 3− systems (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 81:2425–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roy WR, Krapac IG, Chou SFJ, Griffin RA (1991) Batch-type procedures for estimating soil adsorption of chemicals. EPA 530-SW-87-006-F. U.S. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Saulnier I, Mucci A (2000) Trace metal remobilization following the resuspension of estuarine sediments: Saguenay Fjord, Canada. Appl Geochem 15:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sepulveda A, Schuller P, Walling DE, Castillo A (2008) Use of 7Be to document soil erosion associated with a short period of extreme rainfall. J Environ Radioact 99:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith HG, Blake WH (2014) Sediment fingerprinting in agricultural catchments: a critical re-examination of source discrimination and data corrections. Geomorphology 204:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sprenger M, Leistert H, Gimbel K, Weiler M (2016) Illuminating hydrological processes at the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interface with water stable isotopes. Rev Geophys 54:674–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strawn DG, Sparks DL (2000) Effects of soil organic matter on the kinetics and mechanisms of Pb(II) sorption and desorption in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stuckey JW, Schaefer MV, Kocar BD, Benner SG, Fendorf S (2015) Arsenic release metabolically limited to permanently water-saturated soil in Mekong Delta. Nat Geosci 9:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sulu-Gambari F, Seitaj D, Meysman FJR, Schauer R, Polerecky L, Slomp CP (2016) Cable bacteria control iron-phosphorus dynamics in sediments of a coastal hypoxic basin. Environ Sci Technol 50:1227–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Swadzba-Kwasny M (2015) Lead: inorganic chemistry. Encyclopedia of inorganic and bioinorganic chemistry.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951438.eibc0111.pub2
  69. Takahashi Y, Minai Y, Ambe S, Makide Y, Ambe F (1999) Comparison of adsorption behavior of multiple inorganic ions on kaolinite and silica in the presence of humic acid using the multitracer technique. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:815–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tang WW, Zeng GM, Gong JL, Liang J, Xu P, Zhang C, Huang BB (2014) Impact of humic/fulvic acid on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using nanomaterials: a review. Sci Total Environ 468-469:1014–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taylor A, Blake W, Couldrick L, Keith-Roach M (2012) Sorption behaviour of beryllium-7 and implications for its use as a sediment tracer. Geoderma 187-188:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor A, Blake WH, Smith HG, Mabit L, Keith-Roach MJ (2013) Assumptions and challenges in the use of fallout beryllium-7 as a soil and sediment tracer in river basins. Earth-Sci Rev 126:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. U.S. Geological Survey (2016) National water information system data available on the World Wide Web (USGS Water Data for the Nation). Accessed 10 Apr 2016 https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?01645704
  74. U.S. Geological Survey (2018) National water information system data available on the World Wide Web (USGS water data for the nation). Accessed 10 June 2018 https://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?01645704.  https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN
  75. Underwood JW, Renshaw CE, Magilligan FJ, Dade WB, Landis JD (2015) Joint isotopic mass balance: a novel approach to quantifying channel bed to channel margins sediment transfer during storm events. Earth Surf Process Landf 40:1563–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Understanding variation in partition coefficient Kd values. Volume 1: the Kd model, methods of measurement and application of chemical reaction codes. EPA 402-R-99-004A. U.S. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. Wagai R, Mayer LM, Kitayama K (2009) Extent and nature of organic coverage of soil mineral surfaces assessed by a gas sorption approach. Geoderma 149:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wallbrink PJ, Murray AS (1996) Distribution and variability of 7Be in soils under different surface cover conditions and its potential for describing soil redistribution processes. Water Resour Res 32:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Walling DE (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang EX, Benoit G (1996) Mechanisms controlling the mobility of lead in the spodosols of a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Environ Sci Technol 30:2211–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang X, Lu J, Xu M, Xing F (2008) Sorption of pyrene by regular and nanoscaled metal oxide particles: influence of adsorbed organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 42:7267–7272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Welp G, Brummer GW (1999) Adsorption and solubility of ten metals in soil samples of different composition. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 162:155–161Google Scholar
  83. Wong CY, Woolins JD (1994) Beryllium coordination chemistry. Coord Chem Rev 130:243–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu Z, Gu Z, Wang X, Evans L, Guo H (2003) Effects of organic acids on adsorption of lead onto montmorillonite, goethite and humic acid. Environ Pollut 121:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang W, Guo L, Chuang CY, Schumann D, Ayranov M, Santschi PH (2013) Adsorption characteristics of 210Pb, 210Po and 7Be onto micro-particle surfaces and the effects of macromolecular organic compounds. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 107:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yang W, Guo L, Chuang CY, Santschi PH, Schumann D, Ayranov M (2015) Influence of organic matter on the adsorption of 210Pb, 210 Po and 7Be and their fractionation on nanoparticles in seawater. Earth Planet Sci Lett 423:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. You C, Lee T, Li YH (1989) The partition of Be between soil and water. Chem Geol 77:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yu R, Gan P, MacKay AA, Zhang S, Smets BF (2009) Presence, distribution, and diversity of iron-oxidizing bacteria at a landfill leachate-impacted groundwater surface water interface. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zapata F (2003) The use of environmental radionuclides as tracers in soil erosion and sedimentation investigations: recent advances and future developments. Soil Tillage Res 69:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang XC, Friedrich JM, Nearing MA, Norton LD (2001) Potential use of rare earth oxides as tracers for soil erosion and aggregation studies. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1508–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations