Advertisement

Decreasing cadmium uptake of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the cadmium-contaminated paddy field through different cultivars coupling with appropriate soil amendments

  • Long Meng
  • Tuhai Huang
  • Jiachun Shi
  • Jian Chen
  • Fulin Zhong
  • Laosheng Wu
  • Jianming Xu
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

In southern China, Cd-tainted rice produced in Cd-contaminated acidic paddy soils is a serious health concern. Thus, it is essential and urgent to remediate Cd-contaminated soils and reduce Cd accumulation in rice grains for food safety and human health.

Materials and methods

Four soil amendments (e.g., lime, biochar, soil conditioner, and seaweed organic fertilizer) combined with two rice cultivars (Yongyou17, YY-17; and Xiushui09, XS-09) with different Cd accumulation abilities were selected to evaluate the efficacy of safe utilization in a slightly moderately Cd-contaminated paddy soil.

Results and discussion

Results showed that soil amendments significantly increased soil pH and reduced Cd bioavailability compared with the control. Linear regression analysis showed that the decrease in Cd bioavailability was significantly and positively correlated with soil pH increase (P < 0.001). Soil amendments were efficient in reducing Cd uptake by rice root as well as translocation from root to aboveground plant parts. The Cd concentrations in brown rice of YY-17 and XS-09 were 0.34 and 0.22 mg kg−1 for control treatments, respectively, while the Cd concentrations of rice grain using were reduced by 45 to 88% and 55 to 88% soil amendments for two cultivars. Considering the costs and efficiency of soil amendments, the soil conditioner was the best amendment.

Conclusions

In situ immobilization combined with low-Cd-accumulation rice cultivar is an effective approach for food safety in lightly moderately Cd-contaminated acidic paddy soils.

Keywords

Cadmium (Cd) In situ immobilization Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Safe utilization Soil amendments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0200106) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571450 and 41721001).

Supplementary material

11368_2018_2186_MOESM1_ESM.docx (101 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 101 kb)

References

  1. Abad-Valle P, Iglesias-Jimenez E, Alvarez-Ayuso E (2017) A comparative study on the influence of different organic amendments on trace element mobility and microbial functionality of a polluted mine soil. J Environ Manag 188:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91(7):869–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alloway BJ (2013) Heavy metals in soils: trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability (third edition). Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/9789400744707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antoniadis V, Robinson JS, Alloway BJ (2008) Effects of short-term pH fluctuations on cadmium, nickel, lead, and zinc availability to ryegrass in a sewage sludge-amended field. Chemosphere 71(4):759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashir S, Zhu J, Fu QL, Hu HQ (2018) Comparing the adsorption mechanism of Cd by rice straw pristine and KOH-modified biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(12):11875–11883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bian RJ, Joseph S, Cui LQ, Pan GX, Li LQ, Liu XY, Zhang AF, Rutlidge H, Wong S, Chia C, Marjo C, Gong B, Munroe P, Donne S (2014) A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. J Hazard Mater 272:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bian RJ, Li LQ, Bao DD, Zheng JW, Zhang XH, Zheng JF, Liu XY, Cheng K, Pan GX (2016) Cd immobilization in a contaminated rice paddy by inorganic stabilizers of calcium hydroxide and silicon slag and by organic stabilizer of biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(10):10028–10036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Curtin D (2003a) Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability. Adv Agron 78(21):215–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Mani PA, Duraisamy A (2003b) Immobilization and phytoavailability of cadmium in variable charge soils. II. Effect of lime addition. Plant Soil 251(2):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolan NS, Makino T, Kunhikrishnan A, Kim P, Ishikawa S, Murakami M, Naidu R, Kirkham MB (2013) Cadmium contamination and its risk management in rice ecosystems. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic, New York, pp 183–273Google Scholar
  12. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T, Kirkham MB, Scheckel K (2014) Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils—to mobilize or to immobilize? J Hazard Mater 266:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown S, Chaney R, Hallfrisch J, Ryan JA, Berti WR (2004) In situ soil treatments to reduce the phyto- and bioavailability of lead, zinc, and cadmium. J Environ Qual 33(2):522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown S, Christensen B, Lombi E, McLaughlin M, McGrath S, Colpaert J, Vangronsveld J (2005) An inter-laboratory study to test the ability of amendments to reduce the availability of Cd, Pb, and Zn in situ. Environ Pollut 138(1):34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buekers J, Degryse F, Maes A, Smolders E (2008) Modelling the effects of ageing on Cd, Zn, Ni and Cu solubility in soils using an assemblage model. Eur J Soil Sci 59(6):1160–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cao XD, Wahbi A, Ma L, Li B, Yang YL (2009) Immobilization of Zn, Cu, and Pb in contaminated soils using phosphate rock and phosphoric acid. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):555–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen SB, Xu MG, Ma YB, Yang JC (2007) Evaluation of different phosphate amendments on availability of metals in contaminated soil. Ecotox Environ Safe 67(2):278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen D, Guo H, Li RY, Li LQ, Pan GX, Chang A, Joseph S (2016) Low uptake affinity cultivars with biochar to tackle Cd-tainted rice—a field study over four rice seasons in Hunan, China. Sci Total Environ 541:1489–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Contin M, Mondini C, Leita L, Nobili MD (2007) Enhanced soil toxic metal fixation in iron (hydr) oxides by redox cycles. Geoderma 140(1–2):164–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cui HB, Fan YC, Xu L, Zhou J, Zhou DM, Mao JD, Fang GD, Cang L, Zhu ZQ (2016) Sustainability of in situ remediation of Cu- and Cd-contaminated soils with one-time application of amendments in Guixi, China. J Soils Sediments 16(5):1498–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Degryse F, Smolders E, Parker DR (2009) Partitioning of metals (Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) in soils: concepts, methodologies, prediction and applications—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 60:590–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doan TT, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Rumpel C, Janeau J, Jouquet P (2015) Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Sci Total Environ 514:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. García-Carmona M, Romero-Freire A, Sierra Aragón M, Martínez Garzón FJ, Martín Peinado FJ (2017) Evaluation of remediation techniques in soils affected by residual contamination with heavy metals and arsenic. J Environ Manag 191:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godt J, Scheidig F, Grosse-Siestrup C, Esche V, Brandenburg P, Reich A, Groneberg DA (2006) The toxicity of cadmium and resulting hazards for human health. J Occup Med Toxicol 1(1):22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gu HL, Qiu H, Tian T, Zhan SS, Deng THB, Chaney RL, Wang SR, Tang YT, Morel JL, Qiu RL (2011) Mitigation effects of silicon rich amendments on heavy metal accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) planted on multi-metal contaminated acidic soil. Chemosphere 83(9):1234–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327(5968):1008–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hale B, Evans L, Lambert R (2012) Effects of cement or lime on Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb and Zn mobility in field-contaminated and aged soils. J Hazard Mater 199:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harter RD, Naidu R (1995) Role of metal-organic complexation in metal sorption by soils. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic, New York, pp 219–263Google Scholar
  29. Hartley W, Edwards R, Lepp NW (2004) Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests. Environ Pollut 131(3):495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. He YB, Huang DY, Zhu QH, Wang S, Liu SL, He HB, Zhu HH, Xu C (2017) A three-season field study on the in-situ remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy soil using lime, two industrial by-products, and a low-Cd-accumulation rice cultivar. Ecotox Environ Safe 136:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013) Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 92(11):1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khan S, Reid BJ, Li G, Zhu YG (2014) Application of biochar to soil reduces cancer risk via rice consumption: a case study in Miaoqian village, Longyan, China. Environ Int 68:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kördel W, Bernhardt C, Derz K, Hund-Rinke K, Harmsen J, Peijnenburg W, Comans R, Terytze K (2013) Incorporating availability/bioavailability in risk assessment and decision making of polluted sites, using Germany as an example. J Hazard Mater 261:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kostarelos K, Reale D, Dermatas D, Rao E, Moon DH (2006) Optimum dose of lime and fly ash for treatment of hexavalent chromium–contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 6(1–2):171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee TM, Lai HY, Chen ZS (2004) Effect of chemical amendments on the concentration of cadmium and lead in long-term contaminated soils. Chemosphere 57(10):1459–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li RY, Stroud JL, Ma JF, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2009) Mitigation of arsenic accumulation in rice with water management and silicon fertilization. Environ Sci Technol 43(10):3778–3783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li HY, Ye XX, Geng ZG, Zhou HJ, Guo XS, Zhang YX, Zhao HJ, Wang GZ (2016) The influence of biochar type on long-term stabilization for Cd and Cu in contaminated paddy soils. J Hazard Mater 304:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liang XF, Han J, Xu YM, Sun YB, Wang L, Tan X (2014) In situ field-scale remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil using sepiolite and palygorskite. Geoderma 235-236:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu CP, Li FB, Luo CL, Liu XM, Wang SH, Liu TX, Li XD (2009) Foliar application of two silica sols reduced cadmium accumulation in rice grains. J Hazard Mater 161(2–3):1466–1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lombi E, Hamon RE, McGrath SP, McLaughlin MJ (2003) Lability of Cd, Cu, and Zn in polluted soils treated with lime, beringite, and red mud and identification of a non-labile colloidal fraction of metals using isotopic techniques. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):979–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McBride MB (2002) Cadmium uptake by crops estimated from soil total Cd and pH. Soil Sci 167(1):62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meers E, Samson R, Tack FMG, Ruttens A, Vandegehuchte M, Vangronsveld J, Verloo MG (2007) Phytoavailability assessment of heavy metals in soils by single extractions and accumulation by Phaseolus vulgaris. Environ Exp Bot 60(3):385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meng J, Zhong LB, Wang L, Liu XM, Tang CX, Chen HJ, Xu JM (2018) Contrasting effects of alkaline amendments on the bioavailability and uptake of Cd in the rice plants in a Cd-contaminated acid paddy soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(9):8827–8835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mignardi S, Corami A, Ferrini V (2012) Evaluation of the effectiveness of phosphate treatment for the remediation of mine waste soils contaminated with Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn. Chemosphere 86(4):354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mühlbachová G, Simon T, Pechová M (2005) The availability of Cd, Pb and Zn and their relationships with soil pH and microbial biomass in soils amended by natural clinoptilolite. Plant Soil Environ 51(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 60(1–4):193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naidu R, Bolan NS, Kookana RS, Tiller KG (1994) Ionic strength and pH effects on surface charge and Cd sorption characteristics of soils. Eur J Soil Sci 45:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ning DF, Liang YC, Song AL, Duan AW, Liu ZD (2016) In situ stabilization of heavy metals in multiple-metal contaminated paddy soil using different steel slag-based silicon fertilizer. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(23):23638–23647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Novozamsky I, Lexmond TM, Houba VJG (1993) A single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals by plants. Int J Environ An Ch 51(1–4):47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pietrzykowski M, Socha J, van Doorn NS (2014) Linking heavy metal bioavailability (Cd, Cu, Zn and Pb) in scots pine needles to soil properties in reclaimed mine areas. Sci Total Environ 470-471:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter SK, Scheckel KG, Impellitteri CA, Ryan JA (2004) Toxic metals in the environment: thermodynamic considerations for possible immobilization strategies for Pb, Cd, As, and Hg. Crit Rev Environ Sci Tec 34(6):495–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rafiq MT, Aziz R, Yang XE, Xiao WD, Rafiq MK, Ali B, Li TQ (2014) Cadmium phytoavailability to rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in representative Chinese soils. A model to improve soil environmental quality guidelines for food safety. Ecotox Environ Safe 103:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Römkens PFAM, Brus DJ, Guo HY, Chu CL, Chiang CM, Koopmans GF (2011) Impact of model uncertainty on soil quality standards for cadmium in rice paddy fields. Sci Total Environ 409(17):3098–3105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J (2015) Impact of emerging and low cost alternative amendments on the (im)mobilization and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in a contaminated floodplain soil. Ecol Eng 74:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Udeigwe TK, Eze PN, Teboh JM, Stietiya MH (2011) Application, chemistry, and environmental implications of contaminant-immobilization amendments on agricultural soil and water quality. Environ Int 37(1):258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang AS, Angle JS, Chaney RL, Delorme TA, Reeves RD (2006) Soil pH effects on uptake of Cd and Zn by Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 281(1–2):325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang HY, Wen SL, Chen P, Zhang L, Cen K, Sun GX (2016) Mitigation of cadmium and arsenic in rice grain by applying different silicon fertilizers in contaminated fields. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(4):3781–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams PN, Lei M, Sun GX, Huang Q, Lu Y, Deacon C, Meharg AA, Zhu YG (2009) Occurrence and partitioning of cadmium, arsenic and lead in mine impacted paddy rice: Hunan, China. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu G, Kang HB, Zhang XY, Shao HB, Chu LY, Ruan CJ (2010) A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: issues, progress, eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. J Hazard Mater 174(1–3):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. Isrn Ecology 2011:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu XY, Cao XD, Zhao L (2013) Comparison of rice husk- and dairy manure-derived biochars for simultaneously removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions: role of mineral components in biochars. Chemosphere 92(8):955–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang Y, Wang ME, Chen WP, Li YL, Peng C (2017) Cadmium accumulation risk in vegetables and rice in southern China: insights from solid-solution partitioning and plant uptake factor. J Agric Food Chem 65(27):5463–5469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yu HY, Liu CP, Zhu JS, Li FB, Deng DM, Wang Q, Liu CS (2016) Cadmium availability in rice paddy fields from a mining area: the effects of soil properties highlighting iron fractions and pH value. Environ Pollut 209:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zeng FR, Ali S, Zhang HT, Ouyang YN, Qiu BY, Wu FB, Zhang GP (2011) The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plants. Environ Pollut 159(1):84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang WL, Du Y, Zhai MM, Shang Q (2014) Cadmium exposure and its health effects: a 19-year follow-up study of a polluted area in China. Sci Total Environ 470-471:224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao KL, Liu XM, Xu JM, Selim HM (2010) Heavy metal contaminations in a soil–rice system: identification of spatial dependence in relation to soil properties of paddy fields. J Hazard Mater 181(1–3):778–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhao FJ, Ma YB, Zhu YG, Tang Z, McGrath SP (2015) Soil contamination in China: current status and mitigation strategies. Environ Sci Technol 49(2):750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhu QH, Huang DY, Liu SL, Zhou B, Luo ZC, Zhu HH (2012) Flooding-enhanced immobilization effect of sepiolite on cadmium in paddy soil. J Soils Sediments 12(2):169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhu HH, Chen C, Xu C, Zhu QH, Huang DY (2016) Effects of soil acidification and liming on the phytoavailability of cadmium in paddy soils of central subtropical China. Environ Pollut 219:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural and EnvironmentZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Agricultural and Forestry Bureau of WenlingWenlingChina
  3. 3.Agricultural Public Service Center of ZeguoWenlingChina
  4. 4.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations