Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 286–295 | Cite as

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy as a tool for the characterization of biochar from guava waste

  • Tassya T. S. Matos
  • Antônio S. MangrichEmail author
  • Estela M. C. Cardoso
  • Juliana Schultz
  • Mayara R. Fornari
  • Alberto WisniewskiJr
  • Ingrid S. C. Carregosa
Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • 120 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The ability of biochars prepared from pyrolysis of guava pulp and seed industrial wastes to form complexes with the ions vanadyl (VO2+), a Pearson hard acid, and copper divalent (Cu2+), an intermediate acid, was used to characterize the ligand groups of biochars prepared in a laboratory oven and in a pilot plant. These biochars are highly suitable for application as soil conditioners, due to their porous structures and the presence of functional groups on their surfaces.

Materials and methods

The biochars from guava pulp and seeds industrial wastes were obtained in two ways, using a batch process in a laboratory oven (sample BG1) and a continuous flow process in a pilot plant (sample BG2), in both cases employing a final temperature of 350 °C and off. The characterization techniques used were elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy,, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy.

Results and discussion

The FTIR spectroscopy results showed that carboxylic acid groups acted as ligands in the complexes with Cu2+ ions (samples BG1Cu and BG2Cu), with decreases in the intensities of these bands and increased intensities of carboxylate bands after complex formation. The EPR parameters indicated that the complexes with VO2+ ions (samples BG1VO and BG2VO) presented C4V symmetry, with coordination to oxygen ligands in the equatorial plane. The BG1Cu and BG2Cu complexes showed slightly distorted octahedral geometry, with stretching of the bonds on the z-axis, due to the Jahn-Teller effect.

Conclusions

The combination of spectroscopic analyses showed that the BG2 biochar was more effective in complexing with ions, compared to the BG1 biochar, because it underwent a milder pyrolysis that preserved greater amounts of oxygenated functional groups, as observed in the elemental analysis.

Keywords

Biomass waste Complexation Paramagnetic probes Pyrolysis Responsible editor: Yong Sik Ok 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to CNPq and CAPES for research fellowships.

Funding information

This study was supported by INCT E&A.

References

  1. Angelo LC, Mangrich AS, Mantovani KM, dos Santos SS (2014) Loading of VO2+ and Cu2+ to partially oxidized charcoal fines rejected from Brazilian metallurgical industry. J Soils Sediments 14:353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anitha C, Sheela CD, Tharmaraj P, Sumathi S (2012) Spectroscopic studies and biological evaluation of some transition metal complexes of azo Schiff-base ligand derived from (1-phenyl-2,3-dimethyl-4-aminopyrazol-5-one) and 5-((4-chlorophenyl)diazenyl)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 96:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balena SP, Messerschmidt I, Tomazoni JC, Guimarães E, Pereira BF, Ponzoni FJ, Blum WEH, Mangrich AS (2011) Use of Fe3+ ion probe to study intensively weathered soils utilizing electron paramagnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy. J Braz Chem Soc 22:1788–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Budziak CR, Maia CMBF, Mangrich AS (2004) Transformações químicas da matéria orgânica durante compostagem de resíduos da indústria madereira. Quim Nova 27:399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Lima SM, Gómez JA, Barros VP et al (2010) A new oxovanadium(IV)-cucurbit[6]uril complex: properties and potential for confined heterogeneous catalytic oxidation reactions. Polyhedron 29:3008–3013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Oliveira PR, Kalinke C, Gogola JL et al (2017) The use of activated biochar for development of a sensitive electrochemical sensor for determination of methyl parathion. J Electroanal Chem 799:602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Oliveira PR, Lamy-Mendes AC, Gogola JL et al (2015) Mercury nanodroplets supported at biochar for electrochemical determination of zinc ions using a carbon paste electrode. Electrochim Acta 151:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ding C-C, Wu S-Y, Hu X-F, Li GL, Xu YQ (2016) An investigation of the local distortions and the EPR parameters for Cu2+ in 40MgO-(10-x)PbF2-50SiO2-xCuO glasses. J Alloys Compd 664:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doumer ME, Rigol A, Vidal M, Mangrich AS (2016) Removal of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn from aqueous solutions by biochars. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2684–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doumer ME, Vidal M, Mangrich AS, Rigol A (2018) Feasibility of using low-cost, byproduct materials as sorbents to remove heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.144001
  11. Ferreira FP, Vidal-Torrado P, Otero XL, Buurman P, Martin-Neto L, Boluda R, Macias F (2013) Chemical and spectroscopic characteristics of humic acids in marshes from the Iberian Peninsula. J Soils Sediments 13:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavili E, Moosavi AA, Moradi Choghamarani F (2018) Cattle manure biochar potential for ameliorating soil physical characteristics and spinach response under drought. Arch Agron Soil Sci:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1453925
  13. Gevaerd A, De Oliveira PR, Mangrich AS et al (2016) Evaluation of antimony microparticles supported on biochar for application in the voltammetric determination of paraquat. Mater Sci Eng C 62:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph S, Husson O, Graber ER, van Zwieten L, Taherymoosavi S, Thomas T, Nielsen S, Ye J, Pan G, Chia C, Munroe P, Allen J, Lin Y, Fan X, Donne S (2015) The electrochemical properties of biochars and how they affect soil redox properties and processes. Agronomy 5:322–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leones R, Donoso JP, Magon CJ, Silva IDA, de Camargo ASS, Pawlicka A, Silva MM (2015) Ionic, paramagnetic and photophysical properties of a new biohybrid material incorporating copper perchlorate. Electrochim Acta 173:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liao S, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing B (2014) Detecting free radicals in biochars and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 48:8581–8587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mangrich AS, Cardoso EMC, Doumer ME et al (2015) Improving the water holding capacity of soils of Northeast Brazil by biochar augmentation. ACS Symp Ser 1206:339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mangrich AS, Vugman NV (1988) Bonding parameters of vanadyl ion in humic acid from the Jucu river estuarine region, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 75:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matos TTS, Schultz J, Khan MY et al (2017) Using magnetized (Fe3O4 / biochar nanocomposites) and activated biochar as adsorbents to remove two neuro-active pesticides from waters. J Braz Chem Soc 28:1975–1987Google Scholar
  20. McPhail DB, Goodman BA (1987) Oxovanadium (IV) complexes of cysteine characterized by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 Phys Chem Condens Phases 83:3627–3633Google Scholar
  21. Moorhead EG, Sutin N (1966) Rate and equilibrium constants for the formation of the monooxalate complex of iron (III). Inorg Chem 5:1866–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicolini KP, Fukamachi CRB, Wypych F, Mangrich AS (2009) Dehydrated halloysite intercalated mechanochemically with urea: thermal behavior and structural aspects. J Colloid Interface Sci 338:474–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Novotny EH, Martin-Neto L (2002) Effects of humidity and metal ions on the free radicals analysis of peat humus. Geoderma 106:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearson G (1963) Hard and soft acids and bases. J Am Chem Soc 85:3533–3539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reddy NS, Viswanatha R, Chakradhar RPS, Reddy CN (2017) EPR and optical studies of microwave synthesized glasses containing VO2+ ions: meta and pyrophosphate regime. J Alloys Compd 695:1368–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reeder RR, Rieger PH (1971) Electron spin resonance and pH studies of vanadyl complex formation with a-hydroxy and a-mercapto carboxylic acids. Inorg Chem 10:1258–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rezende EIP, Angelo LC, Dos Santos SS, Mangrich AS (2011) Biocarvão (biochar) e sequestro de carbono. Rev Virtual Quim 3:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sakaguchi U, Addison AW (1979) Spectroscopic and redox studies of some copper(II) complexes with biomimetic donor atoms: implications for protein copper centres. JCS Dalton J Chem Soc Dalt Trans:600–608Google Scholar
  29. Senesi N, Sposito G, Martin JP (1986) Copper (II) and iron (III) complexation by soil humic acdis: an IR and ESR study. Sci Total Environ 55:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Senesi N, Calderoni G (1988) Structural and chemical characterization of copper, iron and manganese complexes formed by paleosol humic acids. Adv Org Geochem 13:1145–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stainsack J, Mangrich AS, Maia CMBF, Machado VG, dos Santos JCP, Nakagaki S (2003) Spectroscopic investigation of hard and soft metal binding sites in synthetic melanin. Inorg Chim Acta 356:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, Gu Y, Yang Z (2015) Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 125:70–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thaker BT, Barvalia RS (2013) Bidentate coordinating behaviour of chalcone based ligands towards oxocations: VO(IV) and Mo(V). Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 112:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trubetskaya A, Jensen PA, Jensen AD, Glarborg P, Larsen FH, Andersen ML (2016) Characterization of free radicals by electron spin resonance spectroscopy in biochars from pyrolysis at high heating rates and at high temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 94:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yadav A, Khasa S, Hooda A, Dahiya MS, Agarwal A, Chand P (2016) EPR and impedance spectroscopic investigations on lithium bismuth borate glasses containing nickel and vanadium ions. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 157:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tassya T. S. Matos
    • 1
  • Antônio S. Mangrich
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author return OK on get
  • Estela M. C. Cardoso
    • 1
  • Juliana Schultz
    • 1
  • Mayara R. Fornari
    • 1
  • Alberto WisniewskiJr
    • 2
  • Ingrid S. C. Carregosa
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade Federal de SergipeSão CristovãoBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Energia e Ambiente (INCT E&A)Campus Universitário de OndinaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations