Advertisement

Journal of Soils and Sediments

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 415–428 | Cite as

Historical sediment mercury deposition for select South Dakota, USA, lakes: implications for watershed transport and flooding

  • Maria K. Squillace
  • Heidi L. Sieverding
  • Hailemelekot H. Betemariam
  • Noel R. Urban
  • Michael R. Penn
  • Thomas M. DeSutter
  • Steven R. Chipps
  • James J. Stone
Sediments, Sec 1 • Sediment Quality and Impact Assessment • Research Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Select South Dakota, USA water bodies, including both natural lakes and man-made impoundments, were sampled and analyzed to assess mercury (Hg) dynamics and historical patterns of total Hg deposition.

Materials and methods

Sediment cores were collected from seven South Dakota lakes. Mercury concentrations and flux profiles were determined using lead (210Pb) dating and sedimentation rates.

Results and discussion

Most upper lake sediments contained variable heavy metal concentrations, but became more consistent with depth and age. Five of the seven lakes exhibited Hg accumulation fluxes that peaked between 1920 and 1960, while the remaining two lakes exhibited recent (1995–2009) Hg flux spikes. Historical sediment accumulation rates and Hg flux profiles demonstrate similar peak and stabilized values. Mercury in the sampled South Dakota lakes appears to emanate from watershed transport due to erosion from agricultural land use common to the Northern Great Plains.

Conclusions

For sampled South Dakota lakes, watershed inputs are more significant sources of Hg than atmospheric deposition.

Keywords

Flux Hg Lake radiometric dating Mercury Sediment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Aaron Larson and Robert Smith of South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) for their assistance with data collection. This article is dedicated to the memory of Gene Stueven (South Dakota DENR) who assisted with the initiation of this study. This research was supported by grants from South Dakota DENR and United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 8. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies. The United States Geological Survey South Dakota Coop Unit is jointly supported by the US Geological Survey, South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks, South Dakota State University, and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the United States Government.

Supplementary material

11368_2018_2014_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1764 kb)

References

  1. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Appleby P, Nolan P, Oldfield F, Richardson N, Higgitt S (1988) 210Pb dating of lake sediments and ombrotrophic peats by gamma essay. Sci Total Environ 69:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleby P, Oldfield F (1978) The calculation of 210Pb dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment. Catena 5:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettemariam HH, McCutcheon CM, Davis AD, Stetler LD, DeSutter TM, Penn MR, Stone JJ (2013) Geochemical behavior and watershed influences associated with sediment-bound mercury for South Dakota lakes and impoundments. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biester H, Bindler R, Martinez-Cortizas A, Engstrom DR (2007) Modeling the past atmospheric deposition of mercury using natural archives. Environ Sci Technol 41:4851–4860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birru G (2016) Spatial variability analysis and reclamation of saline-sodic soils in the northern Great Plains. Doctoral Dissertation, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SDGoogle Scholar
  7. Boës X, Rydberg J, Martinez-Corizas A, Bindler R, Renberg I (2011) Evaluation of conservative lithologic elements (Ti, Zr, Al, and Rb) to study anthropogenic element enrichments in lake sediments. J Paleolimnol 46:75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bond JJ, Umberger DE (1979) Technical and economic causes of productivity changes in U.S. wheat production 1949–1976. In: USDA (ed) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Science and Education Administration, Washington, DC, pp 102Google Scholar
  9. Bookman R, Driscoll CT, Effler SW, Engstrom DR (2010) Anthropogenic impacts recorded in recent sediments from Otisco Lake, New York, USA. J Paleolimnol 43:449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callender E, Robbins JA (1993) Transport and accumulation of radionuclides and stable elements in a Missouri River reservoir. Water Resour Res 29:1787–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chalmers AT, Argue DM, Gay DA, Brigham ME, Schmitt CJ, Lorenz DL (2011) Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969-2005. Environ Mont Assess 175:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craft CB, Seneca ED, Broome SW (1991) Loss on ignition and kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils: calibration with dry combustion. Estuaries 14:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dean WE (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition; comparison with other methods. J Sed Res 44:242–248Google Scholar
  14. Dillon P, Evans R (1982) Whole-lake lead burdens in sediments of lakes in southern Ontario, Canada. Hydrobiologia 91-92:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinescu LC, Steinnes E, Duliu OG, Ciortea C, Sjobakk TE, Dumitriu DE, Gugiu MM, Haralambie M (2004) Distribution of some major and trace elements in Danube Delta lacustrine sediments and soil. J Rad Nucl Chem 262:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drevnick PE, Engstrom DR, Driscol CT, Swain EB, Balogh SJ (2011) Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury accumulation in lacustrine sediments across the Laurentian Great Lakes region. Env Poll 161:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Driscoll C, Han Y, Chen C, Evers D, Lambert K, Holsen T, Kamman N, Munson R (2007) Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. Bioscience 57:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engstrom D, Swain E (1997) Recent declines in atmospheric mercury deposition in the upper Midwest. Environ Sci Technol 31:960–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engstrom D, Swain E, Henning T, Brigham M, Brezonik P (1994) Atomspheric mercury deposition to lakes and watersheds - a quantitative reconstruction from multiple sediment cores. In: Baker LA (ed) Advances in chemistry series: Environmental chemistry of lakes and reservoirs. Advances in Chemistry Series): American Chemical Society, vol 237, pp 33–66Google Scholar
  20. Engstrom DR, Balogh SJ, Swain EB (2007) History of mercury inputs to Minnesota lakes: influences of watershed disturbance and localized atmospheric deposition. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2467–2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EPA (2010) Laws and Regulations. http://www.epa.gov/mercury/regs.htm. Accessed August 20, 2014
  22. Euliss NH, LaBaugh JW, Fredrickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK, Swanson GA, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD (2004) The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands 24:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbertson JP (1995) Glaciers in South Dakota. In: Lehr JD (ed) Vermillion, SD: South Dakota Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  24. Graustein W, Turekian K (1986) 210Pb and 137Cs in air and soils measure the rate and vertical profile of aerosol scavenging. J Geophys Res 91:14355–14366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guy HP (1969) Laboratory theory and methods for sediment analysis. In: Laboratory analysis (Vol. TWRI 5-C1, pp. 64, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Vol. TWRI 5). USGS, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  26. Han YM, Cao JJ, Kenna TC, Yan B, Jin ZD, Wu F, An ZS (2011) Distribution and ecotoxicological significance of trace element contamination in a ~150 yr record of sediments in Lake Chaohu, eastern China. J Env Monit 13:743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayer CA, Chipps SR, Stone JJ (2011) Influence of physiochemical and watershed characteristics on mercury concentration in walleye, Sander vitreus, M. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heiri O, Lotter A, Lemcke G (2001) Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. J Paleolimnol 25:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeremiason JD, Engstrom DR, Swain EB, Nater EA, Johnson BM, Almendinger JE, Monson BA, Kolka RK (2006) Sulfate addition increases methylmercury production in an experimental wetland. Environ Sci Technol 40:3800–3806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson K, Aastrup M, Andersson A, Bringmark L, Iverfeldt A (1991) Mercury in swedish forest soils and waters — assessment of critical load. Water Air Soil Pollut 56:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamman N, Engstrom D (2002) Historical and present fluxes of mercury to Vermont and New Hampshire lakes inferred from 210Pb dated sediment cores. Atmos Environ 36:1599–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kharel TP (2016) Soil salinity study in the northern Great Plains sodium affected soil. Doctoral Dissertation, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SDGoogle Scholar
  33. Lan B, Zhang D, Yang Y (2018) Lacustrine sediment chronology defined by 137Cs, 210Pb and 14C and the hydrological evolution of Lake Ailike during 1901-2013, northern Xinjiang, China. Can Underwrit 161:104–112Google Scholar
  34. Lane EW, Koelzer VA (1943) Density of sediments deposited in reservoirs. Federal Interagency Sedimentation Project, Iowa City, Iowa 237:33–66Google Scholar
  35. Lorey P, Driscoll CT (1999) Historical trends of mercury deposition in Adirondack lakes. Environ Sci Technol 33:718–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mast M, Manthorne D, Roth D (2010) Historical deposition of mercury and selected trace elements to high-elevation National Parks in the western US inferred from lake-sediment cores. Atmos Environ 44:2577–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDonald C, Urban N, Barkach J, McCauley D (2010) Copper profiles in the sediments of a mining-impacted lake. J Soils Sediments 10:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonald CP, Urban NR (2007) Sediment radioisotope dating across a stratigraphic discontinuity in a mining-impacted lake. J Environ Radioactiv 92:80–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mierle G (1990) Aqueous inputs of mercury to precambrian shield lakes in Ontario. Env Tox Chem 9:843–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NASS (2014) CropScape - Cropland data layer. In USDA (ed). http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/
  41. Climate at a Glance (2014) National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/. Accessed August 20, 2014
  42. Historical Palmer Drought Indices (2014) National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/drought/historical-palmers.php. Accessed August 19, 2014
  43. NOAA (2014) Summary of Historic Floods and Flash Floods. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/unr/?n=history. Accessed August 22, 2014
  44. NRCS (2017) 2017 South Dakota cropping systems inventory. United States Natural Resources and Conservation Service, pp 12Google Scholar
  45. Owen RK (2015) Spatial variability of saline and sodic soils in the Black Glaciated Region of the northern Great Plains, USA. Masters Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SDGoogle Scholar
  46. Perreault JT (2014) Impact of lake expansion on mercury concentrations in lake sediments, Mackenzie Bison sanctuary, northwest territories. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perry E, Norton SA, Kamman NC, Lorey PM, Driscoll CT (2005) Deconstruction of historic mercury accumulation in lake sediments, northeastern United States. Ecotoxicology 14:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raper RL, Erback DC (1986) Bulk density measurement variability with core samplers. Trans ASAE 30:878–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robbins J (1982) Stratigraphic and dynamic effects of sediment reworking by Great Lakes zoobenthos. Hydrobiologia 91-92:611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robbins J (1985) Great Lakes regional fallout source functions (NOAA technical memorandum ERL GLERL; 56, Vol. Accessed from http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn4392306). Ann Arbor, MI: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Research Laboratories, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory
  51. Rypel A (2010) Mercury concentrations in lentic fish populations related to ecosystem and watershed characteristics. Ambio 39:14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-009-0001-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanei H, Goodarzi F (2006) Relationship between organic matter and mercury in recent lake sediment: the physical–geochemical aspects. Appl Geochem 21:1900–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schelske C, Peplow A, Brenner M, Spencer C (1994) Low-background gamma counting: applications for 210Pb dating of sediments. J Paleolimnol 10:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SDDENR (2015) South Dakota mercury total maximum daily load. Pierre, SD: South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (SDDENR), pp 149Google Scholar
  55. SDGS (2014) South Dakota geology. http://www.sdgs.usd.edu/geologyofsd/geosd.html. Accessed August 20, 2014
  56. Selch T, Hoagstrom C, Weimer E, Duehr J, Chipps S (2007) Influence of fluctuating water levels on mercury concentrations in adult walleye. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon SL, Bouville A, Beck HL (2004) The geographic distribution of radionuclide deposition across the continental US from atmospheric nuclear testing. J Env Rad 74:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singleton AA, Schmidt AH, Bierman PR, Rood DH, Neilson TB, Greene ES, Bower JA, Perdrial N (2017) Effects of grain size, mineralogy, and acid-extractable grain coatings on the distribution of the fallout radionuclides 7Be, 10Be, 137Cs, and 210Pb in river sediment. Geochim Et Cosmo Acta 197:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith A, Abuzeineh AA, Chumchal MM, Bonner TH, Nowlin WH (2010) Mercury contamination of the fish community of a semi-arid and arid river system: spatial variation and the influence of environmental gradients. Env ToxChem 29:1762–1772Google Scholar
  60. Swain EB, Engstrom DR, Brigham ME, Henning TA, Brezonik PL (1992) Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental north america. Science 257:784–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turekian K, Benninger L, Dion E (1983) 7Be and 210Pb total deposition fluxes at new haven, Connecticut and at Bermuda. J Geophys Res 88:5411–5415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Urban N, Eisenreich S, Grigal D, Schurr K (1990) Mobility and diagenesis of Pb and 210Pb in peat. Geochim Et Cosmo Acta 54:3329–3346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. USACE (2007) Environmental assessment: effects of the NY/NJ Harbor deepening project on the remedial investigation/feasibility study of the Newark Bay study area. USACE, New York Division, New York, p 124Google Scholar
  64. USGS (1995) Floods in South Dakota, spring 1995. United States Department of the Interior, pp 4Google Scholar
  65. USGS (2014) Mineral resources on-line spatial data. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/. Accessed August 20, 2014
  66. USGS (2018) Water Watch. http://waterwatch.usgs.gov. Accessed January 12, 2018
  67. Vaidya OC, Howell GD, Leger DA (2000) Evaluation of the distribution of mercury in lakes in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland (Canada). Water Air Soil Poll 117:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Von Gunten L, Grosjean M, Eggenberger U, Grob P, Urrutia R, Morales A (2009) Pollution and eutrophication history AD 1800-2005 as recorded in sediments from five lakes in Central Chile. Glob Planet Change 68:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walters D, Blocksom K, Lazorchak J, Jicha T, Angradi T, Bolgrien D (2010) Mercury contamination in fish in midcontinent great rivers of the United States: importance of species traits and environmental factors. Environ Sci Technol 44:2947–2953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang J, Baskaran M, Niedermiller J (2017) Mobility of 137Cs in freshwater lakes: a mass balance and diffusion study of Lake St. Clair, Southeast Michigan, USA. Geochim Et Cosmo Acta 218:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward D, Nislow K, Chen C, Folt C (2010) Rapid, efficient growth reduces mercury concentrations in stream-dwelling Atlantic Salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (2000) Limnological analysis. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use changes in western corn belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Nat Acad Sci 110:4134–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang H, Engstrom D, Rose N (2010) Recent changes in atmospheric mercury deposition recorded in the sediments of remote equatorial lakes in the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Environ Sci Technol 44:6570–6575CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria K. Squillace
    • 1
  • Heidi L. Sieverding
    • 1
  • Hailemelekot H. Betemariam
    • 2
  • Noel R. Urban
    • 3
  • Michael R. Penn
    • 4
  • Thomas M. DeSutter
    • 5
  • Steven R. Chipps
    • 6
  • James J. Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyRapid CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyRapid CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-PlattevillePlattevilleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Soil ScienceNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  6. 6.U.S. Geological Survey, South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations