Coupling hysteresis analysis with sediment and hydrological connectivity in three agricultural catchments in Navarre, Spain
- 31 Downloads
Rain storm events mobilise large proportions of fine sediments in catchment systems. Sediments from agricultural catchments are often adsorbed by nutrients, heavy metals and other (in)organic pollutants that may impact downstream environments. To mitigate erosion, sediment transport and associated pollutant transport, it is crucial to know the origin of the sediment that is found in the drainage system, and therefore, it is important to understand catchment sediment dynamics throughout the continuity of runoff events.
Materials and methods
To assess the impact of the state of a catchment on the transport of fine suspended sediment to catchment outlets, an algorithm has been developed which classifies rain storm events into simple (clockwise, counter-clockwise) and compound (figure-of-eight; complex) events. This algorithm is the first tool that uses all available discharge and suspended sediment data and analyses these data automatically. A total of 797 runoff events from three experimental watersheds in Navarre (Spain) were analysed with the help of long-term, high-resolution discharge and sediment data that was collected between 2000 and 2014.
Results and discussion
Morphological complexity and in-stream vegetation structures acted as disconnecting landscape features which caused storage of sediment along the transport cascade. The occurrence of sediment storage along transport paths was therefore responsible for clockwise hysteresis due to the availability of in-stream sediment which could cause the “first flush” affect. Conversely, the catchment with steeper channel gradients and a lower stream density showed much more counter-clockwise hysteresis due to better downstream and lateral surface hydrological connectivity. In this research, hydrological connectivity is defined as the actual and potential transfer paths in a catchment. The classification of event SSC-Q hysteresis provided a seasonal benchmark value to which catchment managers can compare runoff events in order to understand the origin and locations of suspended sediment in the catchment.
A new algorithm uses all available discharge and suspended sediment data to assess catchment sediment dynamics. From these analyses, the catchment connectivity can be assessed which is useful to develop catchment land management.
KeywordsHeadwater catchment Hydrological event Hysteresis Sediment connectivity Sediment dynamics
This study was supported by the effective network that was created in COST Action CONNECTEUR (ES1306, Connecting European Connectivity Research). Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the support of the Research Project CGL2015-64284-C2-1-R, founded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
- Bendjoudi H, Hubert P (2002) Le coefficient de compacité de Gravelius: analyse critique d'un indice de forme des bassins versants. Hydrological sciences journal, 47(6):921–930Google Scholar
- Cerdà A, Keesstra SD, Rodrigo-Comino J, Novara A, Pereira P, Brevik E, Giménez-Morera A, Fernández-Raga M, Pulido M, di Prima S, Jordán A (2017) Runoff initiation, soil detachment and connectivity are enhanced as a consequence of vineyards plantations. J Environ Manag 202:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cerdan O, et al. (2010) Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe: a study based on erosion plot data. Geomorphology, 122. Jg., Nr. 1-2, S. 167–177Google Scholar
- Cooper JR, Wainwright J, Parsons AJ, Onda Y, Fukuwara T, Obana, E, Hargrave, GH (2012) A new approach for simulating the redistribution of soil particles by water erosion: a marker-in-cell model. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 117(F4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JF002499
- Einstein HA (1943) Flow on a movable bed. Proc Hydraulic Conf Univ of Iowa Bulletin, pp 333–341Google Scholar
- Heidel SG (1956) The progressive lag of sediment concentration with flood waves. EOS 37:56–66Google Scholar
- Klein M (1984) Anti clockwise hysteresis in suspended sediment concentration during individual storms: Holbeck Catchment; Yorkshire, England. Catena 11:251–257Google Scholar
- Linsley RK, Kohler MA (1951) Variations in storm rainfall over small areas. Eos, Transactions Am. Geophys Union 32:245–250Google Scholar
- Lloyd CEM, Freer JE, Johnes PJ, Collins AL (2015) Testing an improved index for analysing storm nutrient hysteresis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 12(8):7875–7892Google Scholar
- Masselink RJH, Temme AJAM, Giménez R, Casalí J, Keesstra SD (2017) Assessing hillslope-channel connectivity in an agricultural catchment using rare-earth oxide tracers and random forests models | Valorando la conectividad ladera-cauce en una cuenca agrícola, utilizando óxidos de tierras raras como trazadores y modelos de Cuad. Investig Geogr 43:19–39Google Scholar
- Monsalve Sáenz, G. (1999). Hidrología en la Ingeniería. Alfaomega, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
- Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion and conservation. Longman Group Limited, UK, pp 63–74Google Scholar
- Roehl JE (1962) Sediment source areas, delivery ratios and influencing morphological factors. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci Publ 59:202–213Google Scholar
- Sloto RA, Crouse MY (1996) HYSEP, a computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey 96(4040):96 Google Scholar
- Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2012) CANOCO. Biometris, Wageningen, p 5Google Scholar
- Williams GP (1989) Sediment concentration versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 111(1-4):89–106Google Scholar