Life cycle assessment of ferro niobium

  • Iulia Dolganova
  • Fabian Bosch
  • Vanessa BachEmail author
  • Martin Baitz
  • Matthias Finkbeiner



Ferro niobium (FeNb) is a metallic alloy whose industrial use has been increasing steadily in the last decades. This work aims to systematize the available information on FeNb production, provide its inventory data and generate its first technologically representative publicly available life cycle impact assessment (LCIA).


The production of 1 kg of FeNb from pyrochlore in the baseline year 2017 was modelled following a cradle-to-gate approach. Primary information on mass, energy and water flows was collected when possible from the Brazilian leading FeNb supplier, CBMM (80% of the world market). The CML method (CML-IA 4.7) was applied for the impact assessment including global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), ozone layer depletion potential (ODP), abiotic depletion potential (fossil and elemental) (ADPfossil and ADPelemental) and photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP).

Results and discussion

The first stage of pyrochlore processing (pyrochlore ore extraction, mechanical processing and flotation) and the last stage (aluminothermic reaction) bear the highest impact in all analyzed CML impact categories. The primary aluminium consumption has the most important contribution in five out of seven impact categories (50% in ADPfossil, 55% in AP, 35% in EP, 57% in GWP and 40% in POCP). In this sense, the industry should promote a higher share of secondary aluminium in the production process. Also, the impact from electricity consumption and processing chemicals showed to be relevant.


This work is the first LCIA on ferro niobium to be published with representative, high-quality data. A dataset was produced in order to enable ferro niobium to be incorporated to future LCIA-modelling.


Ferro niobium Niobium Life cycle assessment Mining Pyrochlore 



Part of the work presented here was prepared in the context of the DFG project RessMob (Assessment of abiotic and biotic resources within the mobility sector–development of assessment criteria, methods and concepts) (project number: FI 1622/6-1). We would like to thank the DFG for the financial support. The authors are also thankful for the production data kindly provided by CBMM.


  1. Alves A (2015) Proposição de um modelo para a avaliação do ciclo de vida do nióbio. Universidade Metodista de PiracicabaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves AR, dos Reis Coutinho A (2019) Life cycle assessment of niobium: A mining and production case study in Brazil. Miner Eng 132:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach V, Finkbeiner M (2017) Approach to qualify decision support maturity of new versus established impact assessment methods—demonstrated for the categories acidification and eutrophication. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baitz M, Makishi Colodel C, Kupfer T et al (2019) GaBi Database and Modelling Principles. Leinfelden-EchterdingenGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley DC, Stillings LL, Jaskula BW et al (2017) Critical Mineral Resources of the United States — Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply: Niobium and Tantalum. USGS Science Publishing NetworkReston Publishing Service CenterGoogle Scholar
  6. CBMM (2018a) Sustainability Report 2017 CBMM. Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  7. CBMM (2018b) About CBMM. Accessed 10 Jul 2018
  8. Chatham House (2018) ‘’ Accessed 5 Jun 2019
  9. CML - Department of Industrial Ecology (2016) CML-IA Characterisation Factors. Accessed 5 Jun 2019
  10. Comissão de Minas e Energia (2017) Session 1182/17. BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckert J (2012) Niobium and Niobium Compounds. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaAGoogle Scholar
  12. Gediga J, Morfino A, Finkbeiner M et al (2019) Life Cycle Assessment of Zircon Sand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(11):1976–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta CK, Suri AK (1994) Extractive Metallurgy of Niobium, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO 14040 (2006) International Standard – Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and frameworkGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO 14044 (2006) International Standard – Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemos M (2012) Estudos para avaliação da capacidade de reservatório de rejeitos de nióbio. Universidade Federal de Ouro PretoGoogle Scholar
  17. Moura HRS, De Moura L (2007) Melting and purification of niobium. AIP Conf Proc 927:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nikishina EE, Drobot DV, Lebedeva EN (2014) Niobium and tantalum: State of the world market, application fields, and sources of raw materials. Part 2. Russ J Non-Ferrous Met 55:130–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nuss P, Eckelman MJ (2014) Life cycle assessment of metals: A scientific synthesis. PLoS One 9:1–12Google Scholar
  20. Oliveira JF, Saraiva SM, Pimenta JS, Oliveira APA (2001) Technical note: Kinetics of pyrochlore flotation from Araxa mineral deposits. Miner Eng 14:99–105Google Scholar
  21. Santero N, Hendry J (2016) Harmonization of LCA methodologies for the metal and mining industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1543–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schulz K, DeYoung J, Seal R, Bradley D (2017) Niobium and Tantalum. In: Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply. Mineral Resources Program Coordinator U.S. Geological Survey, pp M1–M34Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Geological Survey (2019) Mineral Commodity SummariesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iulia Dolganova
    • 1
  • Fabian Bosch
    • 2
  • Vanessa Bach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Baitz
    • 2
  • Matthias Finkbeiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Sustainable EngineeringTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.thinkstepLeinfelden-EchterdingenGermany

Personalised recommendations