Advertisement

Hotspot identification in the Indonesian tempeh supply chain using life cycle assessment

  • Edi Iswanto WilosoEmail author
  • Pelle Sinke
  • Muryanto
  • Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan
  • Ajeng Arum Sari
  • Joko Waluyo
  • Ary Mauliva Hada Putri
  • Jeroen Guinée
LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Tempeh is a traditional Indonesian fermented soybean product, which plays an essential role in its culture and economy and forms an important non-meat protein source in the diet of its people. Nationally, there are around 80,000 small and medium tempeh producers consuming more than 1 million tonnes of soybeans annually. This raw material is however mostly imported from the USA, which might bring unintended environmental consequences. This paper evaluates the life cycle environmental performance of tempeh by comparing existing tempeh production alternatives in Indonesia, identifying impact hotspots and analysing parameter sensitivity for possible improvement.

Methods

A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted including 11 CML baseline impact categories for a case study of tempeh production in West Java. The study differentiated between two levels of technology, being conventional and hygienic tempeh production. The latter was characterised by the elimination of firewood, an increased energy and material intensity and higher product acceptance in certain market segments. Assuming that it best represents future practices, sensitivity analysis were further carried out on the hygienic tempeh production system.

Results and discussion

Minor differences in environmental impact exist between the conventional and hygienic production systems. For example, the global warming impact of 1 kg of either conventional or hygienic tempeh is between 0.9 and 1.0 kg CO2-eq. Where the soybean cultivation stage is the main contributor to the indicator results for land use and eutrophication, the transport stage is the main contributor to human toxicity, eco-toxicity, stratospheric ozone depletion, climate change, photochemical oxidation and acidification. Road transport within Indonesia was found to dominantly contribute to the total transport impact and to be a highly sensitive parameter, showing great variability due to changes in distance and assumed average load. This study also found that assumed average load from ecoinvent transport services may not reflect average transport conditions in Indonesia.

Conclusions

Hotspots of Indonesian tempeh are related to the transport of soybeans to the tempeh factory and their cultivation. This means that the processing of soybeans into tempeh at the factory only has a small contribution to total environmental impacts. Therefore, improvements aimed at environmental gains should focus mainly on the development of locally grown soybean or other beans and efficient modes of local transport, and to a lesser extent on the installation of wastewater treatment, increased use of renewable energy and increasing energy efficiency.

Keywords

Contribution analysis Environmental performance Fermented food Sensitivity analysis Soybean Traditional food 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions and insights into the Indonesian tempeh industry by former SCOPE project leader Muhammad Ridha (USSEC) and Joko Supardi (PT AFI). The first author would like to thank Program Bantuan Seminar Luar Negeri (BSLN), Ditjen Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan, RISTEKDIKTI-Indonesia for the financial support to attend the LCA Food 2018 conference in Bangkok, Thailand.

Supplementary material

11367_2019_1617_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1.18 mb)
11367_2019_1617_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (154 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 154 kb)

References

  1. Aryanta WR (2000) Traditional fermented foods in Indonesia. Japanese J Lact Acid Bact 10:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babu PD, Bhakyaraj R, Vidhyalakshmi R (2009) A low cost nutritious food “tempeh” - a review. World J Dairy Food Sci 4(1):22–27Google Scholar
  3. BAPPENAS (2014) Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) bidang pangan dan peranian 2015–2019. JakartaGoogle Scholar
  4. Berhow MA, Suk BK, Vermillion KE, Duval SM (2006) Complete quantification of group A and group B soyasaponins in soybeans. J Agric Food Chem 54:2035–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blonk H, Kool A, Luske B (2008) Milieueffecten van Nederlandse consumptie van eiwitrijke producten. GoudaGoogle Scholar
  6. BPS (2017) Rata-Rata Konsumsi per Kapita Seminggu Beberapa Macam Bahan Makanan Penting, 2007–2015. https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2014/09/08/950/rata-rata-konsumsi-per-kapita-seminggu-beberapa-macam-bahan-makanan-penting-2007-2017.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2018
  7. BSN (2012) Tempe: Persembahan Indonesia Untuk Indonesia. 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Delmas R, Lacaux JP, Brocard D (1995) Determination of biomass burning emission factors: methods and results. Environ Monit Assess 38:181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frischknecht R, Editors NJ, Althaus H, et al (2007) Ecoinvent overview and methodology. DübendorfGoogle Scholar
  11. GFA Consulting Group (2015) Impact sheet - SWITCH Asia project: scaling sustainable consumption and production - promoting eco-friendly production in Indonesian tofu and tempeh industryGoogle Scholar
  12. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G et al (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunarta IGWS, Santoso I, Ismanto B, Pradono (2008) Characterizing load limit offences in Indonesia; a statistical approach on overloading cases at WBSs. J Jalan-Jembatan 25:37–55Google Scholar
  14. Hadiwardoyo SP, Sumabrata RJ, Berawi MA (2012) Tolerance limit for trucks with excess load in transport regulation in Indonesia. Makara J Technol 16.  https://doi.org/10.7454/mst.v16i1.1336
  15. Heijungs R, de Koning A, Ligthart T, Korenromp R (2004) Improvement of LCA characterization factors and LCA practice for metals. ApeldoornGoogle Scholar
  16. Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, de Koning A, Green DM (2014) A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data - including estimates for uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henriksson PJG, Heijungs R, Dao HM, Phan LT, de Snoo GR, Guinée JB (2015) Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts. PLoS One 10:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iljas N, Peng AC, Gould WA (1973) Tempeh: an Indonesian fermented soybean food. Wooster, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimmelman M (2017) Jakarta is sinking so fast, it could end up underwater - the New York Times. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendoza Beltran A, Prado V, Font Vivanco D, Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2018) Quantified uncertainties in comparative life cycle assessment: what can be concluded? Environ Sci Technol 52:2152–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392):987–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. President Regulation (2016) Presidential regulation of the republic of Indonesia number 44 year 2016 concerning lists of business fields that are closed to and business fields that are open with conditions to investmentGoogle Scholar
  23. Qin Y, Suh S (2018) Does the use of pre-calculated uncertainty values change the conclusions of comparative life cycle assessments? – an empirical analysis. PLoS One 13:e0209474.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shurtleff W, Aoyagi A (1979) The book of tempeh. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Shurtleff W, Aoyagi A (2007) History of Tempeh: a special report on the history of traditional fermented soyfoods. In: Shurtleff W, Aoyagi A (eds) History of Soybeans and Soyfoods: 1100 B.C. to the 1980s, Unpublishe. Soyinfo center, LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  26. Spielmann M, Bauer C, Dones R, Tuchschmid M (2007) Ecoinvent Transport Services. Ecoinvent report no 14, Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Villigen and UsterGoogle Scholar
  27. Supartono W, Widyasari L, Purwadi D (2014) Implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA) on tempeh production in Bantul district - Yogyakarta special province - Indonesia. In: Aisyah IS, Kosmaryandi N, Jayanegara A, Kuehne RF (eds) Proceedings of the international workshop: tropical bio-resources for sustainable development. IPB Press, Bogor, pp 133–139Google Scholar
  28. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: a basis for greener processes and products, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. van Oers L (2016) CML-IA characterisation factors - Leiden University. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-output/science/cml-ia-characterisation-factors. Accessed 7 Oct 2018
  30. van Zelm R, Schipper AM, Rombouts M et al (2011) Implementing groundwater extraction in life cycle impact assessment: characterization factors based on plant species richness for the Netherlands. Environ Sci Technol 45:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Viana JS, Goncalves EP, Silva AC, Matos VP (2013) Climatic conditions and production of soybean in northeastern Brazil. In: Board J (ed) A comprehensive survey of international soybean research - genetics, physiology, agronomy and nitrogen relationships. InTech, London, pp 377–392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center for ChemistryIndonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)Tangerang SelatanIndonesia
  2. 2.Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML)Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations