Challenges of including human exposure to chemicals in food packaging as a new exposure pathway in life cycle impact assessment
- 98 Downloads
Limiting exposure to potentially toxic chemicals in food packaging can lead to environmental impact trade-offs. No available tool, however, considers trade-offs between environmental impacts of packaging systems and exposure to potentially toxic chemicals in food packaging. This study therefore explores the research needs for extending life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to include exposure to chemicals in food packaging.
The LCIA framework for human toxicity was extended for the first time to include consumer exposure to chemicals in food packaging through the product intake fraction (PiF) metric. The related exposure pathway was added to LCIA without other modifications to the existing toxicity characterization framework used by USEtox®, i.e., effect factor derivation. The developed method was applied to a high impact polystyrene (HIPS) container case study with the functional unit of providing 1 kg of yogurt in single servings. Various exposure scenarios were considered, including an evidence-based scenario using concentration data and a migration model. Human toxicity impact scores in comparative toxic units (CTUh) for the use stage were evaluated and then compared to human toxicity impact scores from a conventional LCIA methodology.
Results and discussion
Data allowed toxicity characterization of use stage exposure to only seven chemicals in HIPS out of fourty-four identified. Data required were the initial concentration of chemicals in food packaging, chemical mass transfer from packaging into food, and relevant toxicity information. Toxicity characterization demonstrated that the combined CTUh for HIPS material acquisition, manufacturing, and disposal stages exceeded the toxicity scores related to consumer exposure to previously estimated concentrations of the seven characterizable chemicals in HIPS, by about two orders of magnitude. The CTUh associated with consumer exposure became relevant when migration was above 0.1% of the European regulatory levels. Results emphasize missing data for chemical concentrations in food contact materials and a need to expand the current USEtox method for effect factor derivation (e.g., to consider endocrine disruption, mixture toxicity, background exposure, and thresholds when relevant).
An LCIA method was developed to include consumer exposure to chemicals in food packaging. Further study is required to assess realistic scenarios to inform decisions and policies, such as circular economy, which can lead to trade-offs between environmental impacts and potentially toxic chemicals in packaging. To apply the developed method, data regarding occurrence, concentration, and toxicity of chemicals in food packaging are needed. Revisiting the derivation of effect factors in future work could improve the interpretation of human toxicity impact scores.
KeywordsFood contact materials Human toxicity potential Near-field exposure Risk assessment
The authors thank Olivier Jolliet, Philippe Roux, and David Amienyo for their feedback on this study.
This work was financially supported by the Marie Curie projects Tox-Train (grant agreement no. 285286) and Quan-Tox (grant agreement no. 631910) funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme. R. Rosenbaum received support from ANR (grant no. 13-CHIN-0005-01), SUEZ, BRL, SCP, Compagnie Fruitière, and VINADEIS.
- Biryol D, Phillips K, Nicolas C, et al (2015) High-throughput dietary exposure predictions for chemical migrants from food packaging materials. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=311911. Accessed 28 Aug 2017
- Bradley E, Coulier L (2007) Report FD 07/01, An investigation into the reaction and breakdown products from starting substances used to produce food contact plastics. London: Central Science LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- DG Environment, EC (2016) Strategic Plan 2016–2020. http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/synthesis/amp/doc/env_sp_2016-2020_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2016
- EC (2011) EU Regulation 10/2011. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32011R0010. Accessed 21 Nov 2016
- EC-JRC (2014) ILCD handbook - EPLCA. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/?page_id=86. Accessed 28 Apr 2014
- EFSA (2017) Non-plastic food contact materials | European Food Safety Authority. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/non-plastic-food-contact-materials. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
- European Bureau for Conservation and Development (2015) Ensuring a non-toxic circular economy promotion of material cycles without hazardous substance. European Parliament, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- European Parliament (2015) Don’t allow recycling of plastics that contain toxic phthalate DEHP, Warn MEPs http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20151120IPR03616/Don%E2%80%99t-allow-recycling-of-plastics-that-contain-toxic-phthalate-DEHP-warn-MEPs. Accessed 2 Apr 2016
- FDA (2015a) CEDI Database http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/PackagingFCS/CEDI/default.htm. Accessed 6 Apr 2016
- FDA (2015b) Recycled plastics in food packaging. http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/PackagingFCS/RecycledPlastics/default.htm. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
- FDA (2016) Guidance documents & regulatory information by topic—guidance for industry: preparation of premarket submissions for food contact substances: chemistry recommendations. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ucm081818.htm. Accessed 16 Sep 2015
- Flanigan L, Frischknecht R, Montalbo T (2013) An analysis of life cycle assessment in packaging for food and beverage applications. United Nations Environment Programme http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/food_packaging_11.11.13_web.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2015
- Gérand Y, Roux P (2014) Novinpak® system life cycle assessment, comparative life cycle assessment of the Novinpak® PET bottle vs. traditional glass bottle including win manufacturing. UMR ITAP, ELSA group, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (eds) (2015) Life cycle impact assessment. Springer Netherlands, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Macleod M, Margni M, van de Meent D, Rosenbaum RK, McKone TE (2008) Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environ Sci Technol 42:7032–7037. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703145t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoekstra EJ, Brandsch R, Dequatre C et al (2015) Practical guidelines on the application of migration modelling for the estimation of specific migration. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC98028/reqno_jrc98028_report%20-%20annex%2010%20-%20pubsy.pdf Accessed 3 Feb 2016
- JRC (2015) European Life Cycle Database. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/ Accessed 15 Sep 2016
- National Toxicology Program (2014) Report on Carcinogens, Thirteenth Edition: Styrene. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles/styrene.pdf. Accessed 9 Sep 2016
- Piringer OG, Baner AL (2008) Plastic packaging materials for food: barrier function, mass transport, quality assurance, and legislation. Wiley Weinheim, Germany, pp 79-157Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Swan SH, Main KM, Liu F, Stewart SL, Kruse RL, Calafat AM, Mao CS, Redmon JB, Ternand CL, Sullivan S, Teague JL, the Study for Future Families Research Team (2005) Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect 113:1056–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R et al (2013) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodology, Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3,. www.ecoinvent.org Accessed 15 Sep 2016
- Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Allen B, Ferguson SS, Sochaski MA, Setzer RW, Houck KA, Strope CL, Cantwell K, Judson RS, LeCluyse E, Clewell HJ, Thomas RS, Andersen ME (2015) Incorporating high-throughput exposure predictions with dosimetry-adjusted in vitro bioactivity to inform chemical toxicity testing. Toxicol Sci 148:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Economic Forum and Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2016) The new plastics economy: rethinking the future of plastics. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/the-new-plastics-economy-rethinking-the-future-of-plastics. Accessed 18 Apr 2016