Advertisement

Review: the availability of life-cycle studies in Sweden

  • Joel Croft
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
  • A. O. Ladenika
  • O. S. MacGregor
  • Mpho Maepa
  • Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
  • Nicholas W. Burman
  • Taahira Goga
  • Kevin G. HardingEmail author
COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

An online review was conducted on the availability of life-cycle assessment (LCA), water, and carbon footprinting studies in Sweden. The main purpose was to quantify the number of available studies, which may be of general interest to non-specialists or as background data for LCA practitioners. Additionally, results from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reports were also included.

Methods

The study used online searches conducted in Google and Google Scholar to obtain the publically available reports. Additionally, searches in ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Wiley were performed to obtain other peer-reviewed academic papers. Only English language results were included.

Results and discussion

LCAs and carbon footprinting studies were the most commonly conducted studies (13 LCA and 12 carbon footprinting studies), whereas water footprinting reports, while still largely available, were fewer in number. A number of GRI reports were also available with the majority of studies conducted for the financial services and real estate sectors. Several studies were in the form of university theses, while companies and research organizations conducted the remainder of research projects.

Conclusions

While several life-cycle assessments, carbon, and water footprinting studies were accessible via Google searches, given the interest in LCA in the country, e.g., the LCM2013 conference in Gothenburg and The Swedish Life Cycle Centre, more studies were expected.

Keywords

Carbon footprinting Environmental management Life-cycle assessment Sweden Water footprinting 

References

  1. Berlin J (2002) Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese. Int Dairy J 12:939–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Goga T, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Maepa M, Harding KG (2018) The availability of life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting studies in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1701–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Börjesson P, Tufvesson L, Lantz M (2010) Life cycle assessment of biofuels in sweden life cycle assessment of biofuels in SwedenGoogle Scholar
  4. Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S et al (2018) Review: life-cycle assessment, water footprinting, and carbon footprinting in Portugal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:1693–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen S (2009) Life cycle assessment of wood pellet. Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  6. CIA (2017) The world factbook — Central Intelligence AgencyGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlgren L, Stripple H, Oliveira F (2015) Life cycle assessment - Comparative study of virgin fibre based packaging products with competing plastic materialsGoogle Scholar
  8. Danielsson L (2014) Water footprint calculation for truck production Beräkning av vattenfotavtryck vid produktion av lastbilar. Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS et al (2018) A discussion on the availability of life-cycle assessment studies in New Zealand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1708–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enso S (2011) Case Study on the Water Footprint of Stora Enso’s Skoghall MillGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksson E, Ek M, Öman A et al (2011) Water Profile for the Swedish forest industry. IVL Svenska MiljöinstitutetGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson O, Jonsson D, Hillman K (2016) Life cycle assessment of Swedish single malt whisky. J Clean Prod 112:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg Å (2005) Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results. J Clean Prod 13:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flysjö A, Henriksson M, Cederberg C, Ledgard S, Englund JE (2011) The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. Agric Syst 104:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. González-García S, Hospido A, Agnemo R, Svensson P, Selling E, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Environmental life cycle assessment of a Swedish dissolving pulp mill integrated biorefinery. J Ind Ecol 15:568–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González-García S, Mola-Yudego B, Murphy RJ (2013) Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:783–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GRI (2017) SDD - GRI database. In: Glob. Report. InitiatGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmner Å, Ebi KL, Lazuardi L, Nilsson M (2014) Carbon footprint of telemedicine solutions - unexplored opportunity for reducing carbon emissions in the health sector. PLoS One 9:e105040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson D (2015) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of apples – A comparison between apples produced in Sweden, Italy and Argentina. Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  20. Jönsson Å, Tillman A-M, Svensson T (1997) Life cycle assessment of flooring materials: case study. Build Environ 32:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lan X, Liu Y (2010) Life cycle assessment of lawnmowers -Two mowers’ case studies. Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  22. Liptow C, Tillman AM, Janssen M (2015) Life cycle assessment of biomass-based ethylene production in Sweden—is gasification or fermentation the environmentally preferable route? Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:632–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maepa M, Bodunrin MO, Burman NW, Croft J, Engelbrecht S, Ladenika AO, MacGregor OS, Harding KG (2017) Review: life cycle assessments in Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1159–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malmodin J, Lundén D (2016) The energy and carbon footprint of the ICT and EaM sector in Sweden 1990–2015 and beyondGoogle Scholar
  25. Minx J, Scott K, Peters G, Barrett J (2008) An Analysis of Sweden’s Carbon Footprint 2 Report for WWFGoogle Scholar
  26. Netz J, Sundin J (2015) Water Footprint of Concrete. KTH Royal University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsson A, Brandt N (2013) Consumption-Based Carbon Accounting of Swedish and Stockholm HouseholdsGoogle Scholar
  28. North Sea Foundation (2008) Seas at Risk: Climate and the Oceans - The carbon footprint of fisheriesGoogle Scholar
  29. Röös E (2013) Analysing the Carbon Footprint of Food Insights for Consumer Communication. Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  30. Röös E, Karlsson H (2013) Effect of eating seasonal on the carbon footprint of Swedish vegetable consumption. J Clean Prod 59:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruuska A (2013) Carbon footprint for building products. VTTGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholz K (2013) Institutionen för energi och teknik Carbon footprint of retail food wastage a case study of six Swedish retail storesGoogle Scholar
  33. Sundberg H (2012) The Water Footprint of Winter Wheat in Sweden – Introduction SUMMARY. Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Trading Economics (2017) Sweden Exports | 1960–2017 | Data | Chart | Calendar | Forecast | NewsGoogle Scholar
  35. von Uthmann H, Lindfors A, Lundgren G (2010) Life-cycle assessment Vattenfall’s electricity in SwedenGoogle Scholar
  36. Wärmark K (2015) Assessment of water footprint for civil construction projects. Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Weather And Climate (2017) Climate and average weather in SwedenGoogle Scholar
  38. Weather Online (2017) Climate of the World: Sweden | weatheronline.co.uk
  39. Zamani B (2016) The challenges of Fast fashion- Environmental and Social LCA of Swedish clothing consumption. Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  40. Zamani B, Svanström M, Peters G, Rydberg T (2015) A carbon footprint of textile recycling: a case study in Sweden. J Ind Ecol 19:676–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Croft
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shaun Engelbrecht
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. O. Ladenika
    • 1
  • O. S. MacGregor
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mpho Maepa
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin
    • 1
    • 3
    • 6
  • Nicholas W. Burman
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Taahira Goga
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Kevin G. Harding
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Chemical and Metallurgical EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Sustainable Process Engineering UnitUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, African Materials Science and Engineering NetworkUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  4. 4.Industrial and Mining Water Research Unit (IMWaRU)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  5. 5.Centre in Water Research and Development (CiWaRD)University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  6. 6.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringFederal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria

Personalised recommendations