Advertisement

Responsive Authoritarianism in China -- a Review of Responsiveness in Xi and Hu Administrations

  • Runya QiaoanEmail author
  • Jessica C. Teets
Review Essay

Abstract

Xi Jinping’s efforts to recentralize political power have triggered a debate over if these changes will destroy the “authoritarian responsiveness” in China credited with regime durability. This review essay assesses “responsiveness” based on empirical research on three types of mechanisms through which the Hu-Wen administration interacted with citizens – within official settings (e.g. responding through government online portals), beyond official government arrangements (e.g. responding to protesters), and channels “in between” (e.g. responding to public outcry on social media). Recent studies seem to suggest that government responsiveness has been declining due to the centralization of political control, the tightening of ideological discipline, and the intolerance of citizen participation. Through our evaluation of the literature on responsiveness of the Chinese government under Xi’s leadership, we find that although initial signs of a less responsive government do exist, there are also counter-forces both inside and outside of the political system. Our findings suggest the need for longitudinal empirical studies of responsiveness to understand if the government might be less resilient due to changing feedback mechanisms.

Keywords

Authoritarian responsiveness China Feedback mechanism Government response Xi administration 

References

  1. 1.
    Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reilly, James. 2011. Strong society, smart state: The rise of public opinion in China's Japan policy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weller, Robert P. 2012. Responsive authoritarianism and blind-eye governance in China. In Socialism vanquished, socialism challenged: Eastern Europe and China, 1989–2009, ed. Nina Bandelj and Dorothy J. Solinger, 83–99. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai, Yongshun. 2004. Managed participation in China. Political Science Quartarly 119 (3): 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    He, Baogang, and Mark E. Warren. 2011. Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stern, Rachel E., and Jonathan Hassid. 2012. Amplifying silence: Uncertainty and control parables in contemporary China. Comparative Political Studies 45 (10): 1230–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stockmann, Daniela. 2013. Media commercialization and authoritarian rule in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Truex, Rory. 2014. Consultative authoritarianism and its limits. Comparative Political Studies 50 (3): 329–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hurst, William. 2016. Chinese law and governance: Moving beyond responsive authoritarianism and the rule of law. Journal of Chinese Governance 1 (3): 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Jidong, Jennifer Pan, and Xu. Yiqing. 2015. Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science 60 (2): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heurlin, Christopher. 2016. Responsive authoritarianism in China: Land, protests, and policy making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marquis, Christopher, and Yanhua Bird. 2018. The Paradox of Responsive Authoritarianism: How Civic Activism Spurs Environmental Penalties in China. Organization Science, Articles in Advance: 1-12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yue, Lori Qingyuan, Jue Wang, and Botao Yang. 2018. Contesting Commercialization: Political Influence, Responsive Authoritarianism, and Cultural Resistance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1-13.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shambaugh, David. 2015. The coming Chinese Crackup. Wall Street Journal 6: 382.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fewsmith, Joseph, and Andrew J. Nathan. 2019. Authoritarian resilience revisited: Joseph Fewsmith with response from Andrew J. Nathan. Journal of Contemporary China 28 (116): 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, Xuedong, and Yan Jian. 2018. Top-level design, reform pressures, and local adaptations. In Governance innovation and policy change: Recalibrations of Chinese politics under xi Jinping, ed. Nele Noesselt, 97–124. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noesselt, Nele, ed. 2018. Governance innovation and policy change: Recalibrations of Chinese politics under xi Jinping. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds. 1999. Democracy, accountability, and representation. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    He, Baogang, and Stig Thogersen. 2010. Giving people a voice? Experiments with consultative authoritarian institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China 19 (66): 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teets, Jessica C. 2014. Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teets, Jessica C. 2013. Let many civil societies bloom: The rise of consultative authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly 213: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schatz, Edward. 2009. The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Comparative Politics 41 (2): 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, Ching Kwan, and Yonghong Zhang. 2013. The power of instability: Unraveling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. American Journal of Sociology 118 (6): 1475–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism hybrid regimes after the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dimitrov, Martin K. 2009. Popular Autocrats. Journal of Democracy 20 (1): 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Means, Gordon Paul. 1996. Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy 7 (4): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Distelhorst, Greg, and Yue Hou. 2017. Constituency service under nondemocratic rule: Evidence from China. The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 1024–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Rooij, Benjamin, Rachel E. Stern, and Kathinka Fürst. 2016. The authoritarian logic of regulatory pluralism: Understanding China’s new environmental actors. Regulation Governance 10 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gallagher, Mary. 2017. Authoritarian legality: Law, workers, and the state in contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lorentzen, Peter L. 2013. Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Repnikova, Maria. 2017. Media politics in China: Improvising power under authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Manion, Melanie. 2015. Information for autocrats: Representation in Chinese local congresses. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wallace, Jeremy L. 2016. Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen, Dan. 2016. Review essay: The safety valve analogy in Chinese politics. Journal of East Asian Studies 16 (2): 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gao, Xiang. 2017. Promotion prospects and career paths of local party-government leaders in China. Journal of Chinese Governance 2 (2): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pepinsky, Thomas. 2014. The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 631–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Teets, Jessica C. 2018. The power of policy networks in authoritarian regimes: Changing environmental policy in China. Governance 31 (1): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lorentzen, Peter. 2017. Designing contentious politics in Post-1989 China. Modern China 43 (5): 459–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Habich, Sabrina. 2015. Dams, migration and authoritarianism in China: The local state in Yunnan. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    O'Brien, Kevin J., and Lianjiang Li. 2006. Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Qiaoan, Runya. 2018. David Speaks to Goliath: Civil Society Policy Advocacy in China. Ph.D. dissertation. Masaryk University, Brno.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang, Guobin. 2009. The power of the internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hassid, Jonathan. 2015. Chinese government responsiveness to internet opinion: Promising but dangerous. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 44 (2): 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wines, Michael, and Sharon LaFraniere. 2011. In Baring Facts of Train Crash, Blogs Erode China Censorship. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/29/world/asia/29china.html 28 July.
  47. 47.
    Nanfang Daily. 2003. The Death of Detaineee Sun Zhigang (Bei shourongzhe Sun Zhigang zhi si). http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2003-04-25/11111016223.html 25 April.
  48. 48.
    Lewis, Orion A. 2013. Net inclusion: New Media’s impact on deliberative politics in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43 (4): 678–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhao, Yuezhi. 2008. Communication in China: Political Economy, power, and conflict. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    King, Garry, Jennifer Pan, and Margret E. Roberts. 2013. How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    King, Garry, Jennifer Pan, and Margret E. Roberts. 2017. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review 111 (3): 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2013. Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for internet freedom. New York: Basic Books (AZ).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Minzner, Carl. 2018. End of an era: How China’s authoritarian revival is undermining its rise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nathan, Andrew J. 2018. China: Back to the Future. ChinaFile. http://www.chinafile.com/library/nyrb-china-archive/china-back-future. 10 May.
  55. 55.
    Teets, Jessica C., and Almen, Oscar. 2018. Advocacy under Xi: NPO Strategies to Influence Policy Change. In Nonprofit Policy Forum (Vol. 9, No. 1). https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/npf.2018.9.issue-1/npf-2017-0028/npf-2017-0028.xml 20 February.
  56. 56.
    Ahlers, Anna L., and Matthias Stepan. 2016. Top-level Design and Local-level Paralysis: Local Politics in Times of Political Centralization, Pp 34-39 in Heilmann, Sebastian and Matthias Stepan eds, China’s Core Executive. Leadership Styles, Structures and Processes under Xi Jinping. Merics.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chen, Xuelian, and Christian Göbel. 2016. Regulations against revolution: Mapping policy innovations in China. Journal of Chinese Governance 1 (1): 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Teets, Jessica C., Reza Hasmath, and Orion A. Lewis. 2017. The incentive to innovate? The behavior of local policymakers in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 22 (4): 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schubert, Gunter, and Björn Alpermann. 2019. Studying the Chinese policy process in the era of “top-level design”: The contribution of “political steering” theory. Journal of Chinese Political Science 2 (24): 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tepperman, Jonathan. 2018. China’s Great Leap Backward. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/15/chinas-great-leap-backward-xi-jinping/ 15 October.
  61. 61.
    Hasmath, Reza, Jessica Teets, and Orion Lewis. 2018. The Innovative Personality? Policymaking and Experimentation in an Authoritarian Bureaucracy. International Conference on Social Policy and Governance Innovation (Guangzhou, China), October.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gao, Xiang, and Jessica C. Teets, Forthcoming 2019. “Citizen Participation in China”, in Karen Baehler and Jeffrey Straussman eds, The Oxford International Handbook of Public Administration for Social Policy: Promising Practices and Emerging Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jia, Kai, and Shaowei Chen. 2019. Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China's central environmental protection inspection. Journal of Environmental Management 245: 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wang, Ray, and Gerry Groot. 2018. Who represents? Xi Jinping’s grand united front work, legitimation, participation and consultative democracy. Journal of Contemporary China 27 (112): 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mu, Xuequan. 2019. Xi Calls for "Greater Strategic Achievements" in Party Governance. Xinhua News. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/12/c_137737144.htm?mc_cid=e4e85f1a32&mc_eid=8c540057ed 12 Jan.
  66. 66.
    Economy, Elizabeth. 2018. The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the Chinese State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Qiaoan, Runya. 2019. Critical Cultural Discourse Analysis: A Case Study of Chinese Official Discourse on Civil Society, Pp.643-654 in Shei, Chris eds, The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Fu, Hualing, and Han Zhu. 2017. After the July 9 (709) crackdown: The future of human rights lawyering. Fordham International Law Journal 41: 1135.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fincher, Leta Hong. 2016. China's feminist five. Dissent 63 (4): 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tiezzi, Shannon. 2018 Communist China’s Crackdown on Labor Protesters. August 28. https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/communist-chinas-crackdown-on-labor-protesters/
  71. 71.
    Hsu, Carolyn, and Jessica Teets. 2016. Is China’s new overseas NGO management law sounding the death knell for civil society? Maybe not. The Asia-Pacific Journal 14 (4): 1–17.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kostka, Genia, and Chunman Zhang. 2018. Tightening the grip: Environmental governance under xi Jinping. Environmental Politics 27 (5): 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    People’s Daily 2013 The Chinese Internet Convention Advocates Seven Baselines. (Renmin ribao: Zhongguo hulianwang dahui changyi gongshou ‘qitiao didian’ http://opinion.people.com.cn/n/2013/0816/c368024-22588798.html. 16 August.
  74. 74.
    Mattis, Peter, and Samantha Hoffman. 2018. China shapes the international media environment, Pp. In 33-52 in Berman, Ilan eds, Digital Dictators: Media, Authoritarianism, and America’s New Challenge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Repnikova, Maria, and Kecheng Fang. 2018.Authoritariann Participatory Persuasion 2.0: Netizens as Thought Work Collaborators in China. Journal of Contemporary China: 1-17.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gan, Chunmei, and Weijun Wang. 2015. Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of microblog and WeChat. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 17 (4): 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Harwit, Eric. 2017. WeChat: Social and political development of China's dominant messaging app. Chinese Journal of Communication 10 (3): 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    The Cyberspace Administration of China 2017 Released New Regulations to Clarify the Responsibility of Every Platform and Govern Together the Public Account. (Wangxinban xingui: Mingque pingtai zeren duofang gongzhi guifan gongzhong zhanghao) http://www.cac.gov.cn/2017-09/12/c_1121648860.htm 12 September.
  79. 79.
    Nathan, Andrew J. 2017. What is Xi Jinping Afraid of? China’s Regime is Less Secure Than It Seems. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-12-08/what-xi-jinping-afraid. 8 December.
  80. 80.
    ChinaFile. 2016. A Thousand Yes-Men Cannot Equal One Honest Advisor. http://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/features/thousand-yes-men-cannot-equal-one-honest-advisor. 21 March.
  81. 81.
    Minard, Paul. 2015. Does ICT diffusion increase government responsiveness in autocracies? An empirical assessment of the political implications of China’s internet. Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1048–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chang, Kuei-min. 2018. New wine in old bottles: Sinicisation and state regulation of religion in China. China Perspectives 1/2: 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gueorguiev, Dimitar D. 2018. Dictator's shadow: Chinese elite politics under xi Jinping. China Perspectives 1-2: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Leutert, Wendy. 2018. Firm control: Governing the state-owned Economy under xi Jinping. China Perspectives 1-2: 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Solinger, Dorothy J. 2018. A challenge to the dominant portrait of xi Jinping. China Perspectives 1-2: 3–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Asian Studies, Faculty of ArtsPalacky UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.Political Science DepartmentMiddlebury CollegeMiddleburyUSA

Personalised recommendations