Advertisement

Mainstream IR Theoretical Perspectives and Rising China Vis-À-Vis the West: The Logic of Conquest, Conversion and Socialisation

  • Young Chul ChoEmail author
  • Yih-Jye Hwang
Research Article

Abstract

The aim of this article is to critically examine how the mainstream International Relations (IR) theoretical perspectives — realist, liberalist, and constructivist — make sense of the relationships between Self and Others in explaining the rise of China in IR. Our argument is two-fold. First, although mainstream IR perspectives are believed to produce objective, neutral, scientific, and universal knowledge about reality and how the world works, they are not value-free explanations but normative approaches that serve the US/West hegemony, and Orientalism appears to constitute the hidden normative underpinning of those perspectives. Second, considering mainstream IR perspectives as problem-solving approaches for the hegemonic US/West reveals that the hegemonic Self uses the logic of conquest, conversion, and socialisation to deal with the Other, rising China.

Keywords

IR theoretical perspectives Rising China Self/Other East Asia International relations 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A3A2923970).

References

  1. 1.
    Abe, Shinzo. 2012. Asia’s democratic security diamond. 27 November 2012, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-strategic-alliance-for-japan-and-india-by-shinzo-abe?barrier=true. Accessed 14 July 2016.
  2. 2.
    Art, Robert. 2008. The United States and the Rise of China: Implications for the Long Haul. In China’s Ascent: Power, Security and the Future of International Politics, ed. Robert S. Ross and Zhu Feng, 260–292. USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asthana, Anushka, Justin McCurry, and Patrick Wintour. 2016. David Cameron: China must abide by ruling on South China Sea. The: Guardian.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaney, David L., and Inayatullah, Naeem (2016). "Difference." In Critical imaginations in international relations, eds. Aoileann Ni Mhurchu and Reiko Shindo. London: Routledge. 70–86.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bräuner, Oliver. 2009. China’s changing approach to international intervention: In the post-cold war era. Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buzan, Barry. 2010. China in international society: Is 'Peaceful Rise' possible. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Callahan, William A. 2008. Chinese visions of world order: Post-hegemonic or a new hegemony? International Studies Review 10 (4): 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chacko, Priya 2004. Modernity, Orientalism and the Construction of International Relations. Paper Presented at the Oceanic Conference on International Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, 14–16 July.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan, Gerald. 1999. Chinese Perspectives on International Relations: A Framework for Analysis. New Zealand: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Rong. 2013. A critical analysis of the U.S. “pivot” toward the Asia-Pacific: How realistic is neo-realism? Connections: The Quarterly Journal 12 (3): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, Ching-Chang, and Young Chul Cho. 2016. Theory. In Critical imaginations in international relations, ed. Aoileann Ni Mhurchu and Reiko Shindo, 245–261. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, Young Chul. 2012. State identity formation in constructivist security studies: A suggestive essay. Japanese Journal of Political Science 13: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho, Young Chul, and Byoungha Lee. 2016. In/security discourses of the U.S. rebalance to Asia, and rising China: An investigation from mainstream and critical theories. East and West Studies 28 (3): 177–207.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christensen, Thomas J. 2015. The China challenge: Shaping the choices of a rising power. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen, Paul A. 2003. China unbound: Evolving perspectives on the Chinese past. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen, Warren I. 2007. China's rise in historical perspective. The Journal of Strategic Studies 30: 683–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox, Robert W. 1983. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium 12: 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cox, Robert W. 1986. Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. In Neorealism and its critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane, 204–254. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cronin, Patrick M. 2012. As the world rebalances in the Asia-Pacific century, so must the United States. Global Asia 7 (4): 8–13.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dalby, Simon. 1988. Geopolitical discourse: The Soviet Union as other. Alternatives XIII 13: 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Delanty, Gerard. 2005. Social science: Philosophical and methodological foundations. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doyle, Michael W. 2012. Liberal Peace: Selected Peace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dunne, Tim. 2008. Liberalism. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, ed. John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, 108–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dyer, Geoff. 2014. The contest of the century: The new era of competition with China - and how America can win. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fairbank, John King, ed. 1968. The Chinese world order: Traditional China's foreign relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feng, Hui. 2006. The politics of China's accession to the World Trade Organization: The dragon Goes global. New York: Routledge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fravel, M. Taylor. 2005. Regime insecurity and international cooperation: Explaining China's compromises in the territorial dispute. International Security 30 (2): 46–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedberg, Aaron L. 2005. The future of US-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security 30 (2): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Friedberg, Aaron L. 2011. A contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Friedberg, Aaron L. 2012. Bucking Beijing: An alternative U.S. China policy. Foreign Affairs 91 (5): 49–58.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gill, Bates. 2007. Rising star: China’s new security diplomacy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldstein, Avery. 2005. Rising to the challenge: China's grand strategy and international security. Stanford: Stanford University press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goldstein, Avery. 2007. Power transitions, institutions, and China's rise in East Asia: Theoretical expectations and evidence. The Journal of Strategic Studies 30 (4–5): 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gregory, Donna U. 1989. Foreword. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, ed. James Der Derian and Michael J. Shapiro, xiii–xxxi. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hagerdal, Hans. 1997. The orientalism debate and the Chinese Wall: An essay on Said and sinology. Itinerario 21: 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Halper, Stefan. 2010. The Beijing consensus: How China's authoritarian model will dominate the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harner, Stephen. 2015. ‘Obama’s “Pivot” Policy Toward China in the South China Sea Sure to Backfire.” Forbes, June 4, 2015. http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenharner/2015/06/04/obamas-pivot-policy-toward-china-in-the-south-china-sea-sure-to-backfire/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  40. 40.
    Hayot, Eric, Haun Saussy, and Steven G. Yao. 2008. Sinographies: Writing China. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Holslag, Jonathan. 2015. China's coming war with Asia. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hopf, Ted. 1998. The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security 23: 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ikemberry, G. John, and Charles A. Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization 44: 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Inayatullah, Naeem, and David L. Blaney. 2004. International relations and the problem of difference. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jacques, Martin. 2012. When China rules the world: The rise of the middle kingdom and the end of the Western world. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ji, Fengyuan. 2017. The West and China: Discourses, agendas, and change. Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4): 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1998. Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2008. Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. New Jersey: Princeton. University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnston, Alastair Iain, and Paul Evans. 1999. China's engagement with multilateral security institutions. In Engaging China: The management of an emerging power, ed. Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert Ross, 241–278. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jones, Branwen Gruffydd. 2006. Introduction: International relations, eurocentrism, and imperialism. In Jones, ed. Branwen Gruffydd, 1–19. Lanham: Decolonizing International Relations.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kang, David C. 2007. China rising: Peace, power, and order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kant, I. 2017. Perpetual Peace. In Conflict after the cold war, ed. R.K. Betts, 138–144. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kaplan, Robert D. (2005). How we would fight China. The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/06/how-we-would-fight-china/303959/, Assessed 4 Feb. 2018.
  56. 56.
    Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Introduction: Alternative perspectives on National Security. In The culture of National Security: Norms and identity in world politics, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kavalski, Emilian. 2012. Waking IR up from its 'Deep Newtonian Slumber'. Millennium 41 (1): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1973. Power and Interdependence. Survival 15: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kirshner, Jonathan. 2010. The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18: 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kissinger, Henry. 2012. On China. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Koo, M.G. 2009. The Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute and Sino-Japanese political-economic relations: Cold politics and hot economics? The Pacific Review 22 (2): 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kowert, Paul, and Jaffrey Legro. 1996. Norms, identity, and their limits: Atheoretical reprise. In The culture of National Security: Norms and identity in world politics, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein, 451–497. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2008. Offensive: How china's soft power is transforming the world. Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lampton, D.M. 2008. The three faces of Chinese power: Might, money, and minds. US: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lardy, Nicholas R. 1999. China and international financial system. In China joins the world: Progress and prospects, ed. Elizabeth Economy and Michel Oksenberg, 206–230. New York: Council on Foreign Relation Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Liao, Rebecca. 2015. Sorry, Obama: America Can’t contain China. The National Interest, http://nationalinterest.org/feature/sorry-obama-america-cant-contain-china-13097. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  68. 68.
    Ling, L.H.M. 2002. Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the West. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ling, L.H.M. 2014. The Dao of world politics: Towards a post-Westphalian, Worlist international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lyon, Rod. 2015. Assessing the US Rebalance to the Asia–Pacific. The Strategist, January 16, 2015. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/assessing-the-us-rebalance-to-the-asia-pacific/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  71. 71.
    Mackerras, Colin. 1999. Western images of China. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Manners, Ian. 2002. Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mearsheimer, John J. 2010. The gathering Strom: China's challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3: 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mediros, Evan, and Fravel M. Taylor. 2003. China's new diplomacy. Foreign Affairs 82 (6): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Morgenthau, Hans J. 1964. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nayak, Meghana, and Eric Selbin. 2010. Decentering international relations. London: Zen Books.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Neumann, Iver B. 1996. Self and other in international relations. European Journal of International Relations 2 (2): 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Organski, Abramo F.K. 1958. World politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Palat, Ravi Arvind. 2000. Beyond orientalism: Decolonizing Asian studies. Development and Society 29: 105–135.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pan, Chengxin. 2004. The "China threat" in American self-imagination: The discursive construction of other as power politics. Alternatives 29 (3): 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Pan, Chengxin. 2012. Knowledge, desire and power in global politics: Western representations of China’s rise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Pant, Harsh V. 2012. Great power politics in East Asia: The US and China in competition. China Report 48 (3): 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pempek, Thomas J. 2010. Soft balancing, hedging, and institutional Darwinism: The economic-security Nexus and east-Asian regionalism. Journal of East Asian Studies 10: 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pillsbury, Michael. 2016. The hundred-year Marathon: China’s secret strategy to replace America as the global superpower. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Qin, Yaqing. 2009. Relationality and processual construction: Bringing Chinese ideas into international relations theory. Social Sciences in China 30 (4): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Qin, Yaqing. 2016. A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review 18: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Qin, Yaqing. 2018. A relational theory of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rachman, Gideon. 2016. Easternisation: War and peace in the Asian century. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rice, Susan. 2015. National Security Advisor Susan E. Rice’s As Prepared Remarks on the U.S.-China Relationship at George Washington University. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/21/national-security-advisor-susan-e-rices-prepared-remarks-us-china. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  91. 91.
    Ross, Robert S. 2012. The problem with the pivot: Obama's new Asia policy is unnecessary and counterproductive. Foreign Affairs 91 (6): 70–82.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Russett, Bruce (2013). Liberalism. In: Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.) International relations theories: Discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 94–113.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism, 1–2. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Schell, Orville, and John Delury. 2013. Wealth and power: China's long march to the twenty-first century. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Seth, Sanjay. 2011. Postcolonial theory and the critique of international relations. Millennium 40: 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Shambaugh, David. 2016. China's future. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Shapiro, Michael J. 1988. The politics of representation: Writing practices in biography, photography, and policy analysis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Shih, Chih-Yu. 2013. Sinicizing international relations: Self, civilization and intellectual politics in subaltern East Asia. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Shih, Chih-yu, and Hwang, Yih-Jye (2018 forthcoming). Re-worlding the 'West' in post-Western IR: The reception of sun Zi's the art of war in the Anglosphere. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Shinn, David H. 2008. Military and security relations: China, Africa, and the rest of the world. In China into Africa: Trade, aid and influence, ed. Robert Rotberg, 155–192. Cambridge: MA World Peace Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Shirk, S. 2017. Trump and China: Getting to yes with Beijing. Foreign Affairs 96.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Smith, Tony. 1994. America's Mission: The United States and the worldwide struggle for democracy in the twentieth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Snyder, Jack. 2004. One world, rival theories. Foreign Policy 145 (November/December): 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Stähle, Stefan. 2008. China’s Shifting Attitude towards United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. The China Quarterly 195: 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Steinfeld, Edward. 2010. Playing our game: Why China rise Doesn't threaten the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    The White House. 1996. A National Security Strategy of engagement and enlargement. The White House: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Tickner, Arlene B. 2013. Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist international relations. European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Tickner, Arlene B., and David L. Blaney, eds. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Tiezzi, Shannon. 2015. Yes, the US does want to contain China (Sort of). The Diplomat: http://thediplomat.com/2015/08/yes-the-us-does-want-to-contain-china-sort-of/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  110. 110.
    Vukovich, Daniel F. 2012. China and orientalism: Western knowledge production and the P.R.C. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wang, Ning. 1997. Orientalism versus Occidentalism? New Literary History 28: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wang, Yuan-kang. 2011. Harmony and war: Confucian culture and Chinese power politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Weede, E. (2010). The capitalist peace and the rise of China: Establishing global harmony by economic interdependence. International Interactions 36, 2: 206–213.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46: 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Yan, Xuetong. 2011. Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Yan, Xuetong. 2016. Political leadership and power redistribution. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Zhao, Suisheng. 2004. Chinese foreign policy: Pragmatism and strategic behavior. In Chinese foreign policy: Pragmatism and strategic behavior, ed. Suisheng Zhao, 3–21. New York: An East Gate Book.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zhao, Tingyang. 2006. Rethinking empire from a Chinese concept: "all-under-heaven" (Tian-xia). Social Identities 12 (1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Zhou, Ning. 2006. Tianchao Yaoyuan: Xifang De Zhongguo Xingxiang Yanjiu. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Zhu, Yaowei. 1994. Hou Dongfang Zhuyi: Zhong-Xi Wenhua Piping Lunshu Celue. Taipei: Luotuo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The School of International StudiesChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Leiden University CollegeLeiden UniversityThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations