Advertisement

Introduction: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?

  • Chunman ZhangEmail author
  • Xiaoyu Pu
Research Article

Abstract

Can China rise peacefully? Will China and the United States go to war? As U.S. and China face rising tensions in trade, technology, cyberspace, and the South China Sea, etc., scholars are concerned about the future of the Sino-U.S. relationship. In history, the relationship between a rising power and a hegemonic power often ends up with severe conflicts, even wars. The main reason is probably the Thucydides Trap, which Graham Allison defines as the severe structural stress caused when a rising power threatens to upend a ruling one. This special issue invite scholars from China, U.S. and other countries to examine the theoretical mechanisms and policy implications of the Thucydides Trap. Each of these articles in this special issue examines unique problems and makes original contributions to our understanding of the Thucydides Trap and U.S.-China relationship. Most authors in this special issue believe that the Thucydides Trap provides a useful lens for studying the China-U.S. relationship in spite of some reservations. This special issue addresses two broad questions: First, how can one construct a thick and comprehensive understanding of the Thucydides Trap? Second, how to analyze, examine and even predict the tensions, problems and future of the Sino-U.S. relationship? There is no doubt that the current relationship between the two has deteriorated to an extent that old paradigms of conflict resolutions seem to be obsolete. Although it’s difficult to predict the future of Sino-U.S. relations, both countries especially political leaders can search for new paradigms to escape the Thucydides Trap. America and China are not destined for war, but destined for an uncertain future.

Keywords

Sino-U.S. relations Power Thucydides trap Uncertainty 

References

  1. 1.
    Allison, G. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. 2009. Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fearon, J. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mearsheimer, J. 2010. The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Powell, R. 2006. War as a commitment problem. International Organization 60 (1): 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qin, Yaqing. 2016. A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review 18 (1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shirk, S. 2007. China: Fragile superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thucydides, translated by Rex Warner. 1972. History of the Peloponnesian war. London: Penguin Classics, Revised edition.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thucydides, translated by Richard Crawley and edited by Robert Strassler. 1996. The landmark Thucydides: A comprehensive guide to the Peloponnesian war. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Welch, D. 2003. Why international relations theorists should stop reading Thucydides. Review of International Studies 29 (3): 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yan, X. 2011. Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power, 2011. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, C. 2017. How to merge Western theories and Chinese indigenous theories to study Chinese politics? Journal of Chinese Political Science 22 (2): 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao, T. 2009. A political world philosophy in terms of all-under-heaven (tian-xia). Diogenes 56 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Study in Social SciencesFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations