Advertisement

Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 341–360 | Cite as

Mapping the Knowledge Domain: Research on Service-Oriented Government in China

  • Zhiqiang Xia
  • Sang Tian
  • Xingyu YanEmail author
Review Essay

Abstract

Establishing a service-oriented government (SOG) that can satisfy the needs of the people is not only a critical research topic in the field of public administration, but also a strategic agenda officially proposed since the Nineteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). As SOG research increases, it is important to thoroughly review the topics and trajectory of research on SOG in China. This paper uses CiteSpace, a visual analysis software, to provide an up-to-date overview and systematic summary of the research topics, trajectory, and gaps in SOG research in China. SOG research in China is classified into four categories: SOG concepts, development paths, government reforms, and performance evaluations. This paper illustrates the underlying problems, such as unsystematic theoretical development, research perspectives, and deficiency of the integrated research on the development mechanism, prominent focuses, and practical applicability. We concluded by identifying new trends in SOG research in China regarding government–society relations and big data.

Keywords

Service-oriented government Big data Research trends State-society relations 

References

  1. 1.
    Bo, Guili. 2012. An accurate explanation for the construction of SOG. Administrative Tribune 19 (1): 8–12.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, Zhenming. 2004. Building a public-service oriented government against a background of deepening the reform of administrative system. Chinese Public Administration 12: 54–58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Guo. 2008. E-government in the construction of SOG. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 1: 92–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Chaomei. 2009. CiteSpace II: Identification and visualization of new trends and new dynamics in scientific literature. Journal of The China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 3: 406–407.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Yahui. 2017. On the phase of the construction of the SOG. Chongqing. Social Sciences 6: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, Huang. 2004. Theoretical clarification of SOG. Chinese. Public Administration 11: 21.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao, Shangquan. 2007. Improving the public service system and accelerating the construction of SOG. China Reform 12: 11–20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao, Xiaoping, and Yanjun Sun. 2009. Service · responsibility · rule of law · integrity: Objectives, rules, mechanisms and evaluation criteria of SOG construction. Expanding. Horizons 4: 45–47.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hou, Yulan. 2005. New public service and construction of SOG. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 4: 31–34.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang, Xiaoping. 2007. Public participation in the construction of SOG. Social Science Research 4: 1–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang, Xiaoping, and Nan Su. 2014. An analysis of service government in China based on knowledge mapping. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 2: 98–109.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Junpeng. 2004. Reflections on building a public-service oriented government. Journal of the Party School of Tianjin Committee of the CPC 2: 40–44.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, Jing. 2005. The theoretical basis of building a SOG in China. CASS Journal of Political Science 4: 69–74.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Xirui. 2002. SOG: A selected target of China’s governmental reform in the context of economic globalization. Chinese Public Administration 7: 5–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, Junsheng. 2004. On the value and theoretical basis of a SOG. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences 5: 52–57.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, Xirui, and Longfei Duan. 2004. SOG: Essence and theoretical basis. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 5: 25–29.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng, Xianggang. 2008. The development tend of performance measurement for SOG in China. In Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition 2:22–28+159.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng, Xianggang, and Bohui Cheng. 2012. A review of research on performance evaluation of SOG. Administrative Tribune 1: 40–47.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peng, Xianggang, and Yongsheng Li. 2013. Performance evaluation of SOG: Value orientation and requirements. Administrative Tribune 20 (5): 25–29.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peng, Xianggang, and Na Zhao. 2010. An analysis on problems and countermeasures in the process of evaluating SOG performance. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section) 6: 77–84.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shen, Ronghua. 2004. Options to improve the level of government's public service. Chinese. Public Administration 1: 29–32.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shen, Ronghua, and Kuojian Wang. 2010. A study of research on SOG in China. Administrative Tribune 17 (4): 48–53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheng, Mingke. 2009. Comparison of subjective assessment and comprehensive indicators evaluation in government performance evaluation. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1: 14–18.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sheng, Mingke, and Guofu Peng. 2008. An outline of research on the performance evaluation system of public-service oriented government. Southeast Academic Research 3: 54–60.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, Hailing. 2017. Research on the path of social organizations participating in SOG's construction. People’s Tribune 7: 62–63.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu, Yuzong. 2004. The concept, connotation and characteristics of SOG. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science) 2: 406–410.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xie, Qingkui. 2005a. Government innovation: A basic approach to service style of government. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1: 126–132.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xie, Qingkui. 2005b. Theoretical research on the construction of SOG. Study & Exploration 5: 69–70.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu, Xingli. 2009. Study on the mechanisms of SOG's performance evaluation. Chinese Public Administration 8: 71–73.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xue, Gang, Guili Bo, Xiaokang Liu, and Yin Yanhong. 2013. Research on the application of performance evaluation results of SOG: Current situation, problems and countermeasures. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 2: 16–19.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yan, Jirong. 2006. Reflections on the reform of SOG. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 2: 21–24.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yang, Tuo, and Lu, Ning. 2012. Thinking of improving the third party performance evaluation system of the local government. Economy and Management 3:15–18.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yu, Jianxing, and Xiang Gao. 2012. The SOG in China: Past, present and the future. Chinese Public Administration 8: 22–27.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, Chengfu. 1999. China’s governmental reform to meet the needs of 21st century: Choices of basic strategies. Teaching and Research 7: 4–10+79.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, Chengfu. 2003. Governance in the information age: The essence of electronic government. Chinese Public Administration 1: 13–16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang, Xiaode. 2004. A systematic design of government process reengineering. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance 6: 26–29.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang, Zaisheng, and Yong Yang. 2009. Construction of SOG in China from the perspective of new public management. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science) 11 (2): 139–142.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zheng, Fanghui, and Ziwei Bi. 2009. The third party performance evaluation in construction of SOG. Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Science Edition) 4: 33–38.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhong, Ming. 2003. E-government: An approach to modern public-service oriented government. China Soft Science 9: 27–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Sichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations