Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Argentina: Unraveling the Path

  • Javier LuqueEmail author
Research Article


This article explores the political economy of Chinese outward foreign direct investment (FDI) in Argentina during the reign of Nestor Kirchner and Cristina Fernandez. Among other things, it contemplates possible links between Chinese outward FDI (OFDI) volumes and Argentina’s domestic and foreign policies. It also analyses a mixture of successful and unsuccessful Chinese investment cases in the agricultural, chemical, and banking sectors in order to engage the debate about the drivers of Chinese OFDI (COFDI), with some stressing business and economic factors and others emphasizing the primacy of political factors. In regards to the former, my study shows that Argentine policymakers did not offer special accommodations to Chinese investors despite the pro-China proclivities of Argentine leaders and their country’s economic and political need for China. Moreover, at the local level, Argentine politics actually proved to be an obstacle to successful Chinese deals. As for the latter issue, Chinese companies were not inclined to invest in Argentina because of the China stance of the Argentine government, but rather because they saw opportunities to exploit fertile agricultural soil, special tax regimes for investors, and opportunities to integrate into global value chain. My findings have a number of important theoretical and policy implications.


Chinese outward foreign direct investment Argentina Kirchnerism China 



This is a revised version of a paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association of Chinese Political Studies, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. The author would like to thank the participants on the “China’s Trade and Investment Relations with Latin America Panel” for their useful feedback and suggestions and especially the special issue editor Jean-Marc F. Blanchard for his substantial guidance regarding content and editorial issues. The author also would like to thank his two anonymous interviewees, both government officials, for their contribution.


  1. 1.
    Barilochense. 2011. Sodero Nievas avala suspender la aplicación del convenio agroalimentario con China. Barilochense.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baškarada, S. 2014. Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report 19 (40): 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanchard, J.-M.F. 2011. Chinese MNCs as China’s new long march: a review and critique of the western literature. Journal of Chinese Political Science 16 (1): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanchard, J.-M.F. 2016. The political economy of China’s contemporary Latin American relations: issues, findings, and prospects. Asian Perspective 40 (4): 553–578.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blanco, J. 2011. Busca ingresar en el país el mayor banco chino y va por el Standard. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardoza, G., G. Fornes, P. Li, N. Xue, and S. Xu. 2015. China goes global: public policies’ influence on small- and medium-sized enterprises’ international expansion. Asia Pacific Business Review 21 (2): 188–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarin. 2010. Malestar oficial con China por la crisis de la soja: citan al embajador. Clarin.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarin. 2010. Polémica por una inversión china en Tierra del Fuego. Clarin.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarin. 2011. Cresud negocia asociarse con una empresa china. Clarin.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Creutzfeldt, B.H. 2016. Not all plain sailing: opportunities and pitfalls for Chinese Investment in Peru. Asian Perspective 40 (4): 603–626.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delía, C., C. Galperín, and N. Stancanelli. 2008. El rol de China en el mundo y su relación con la Argentina. Revista del CEI 13: 67–89.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dinatale, M. 2014. Polémica por una estación espacial de China en el Sur. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dinatale, M. 2015. Susana Malcorra: Vamos a desideologizar la política exterior. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dinatale, M. 2015. La base militar china en Neuquén no podrá usarse con fines militares. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunning, J. 1979. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies 11 (1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    El Cronista. 2015. Carta de Macri a China: los acuerdos podrían ser inconstitucionales. El Cronista.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    El Territorio. 2011. Oficializaron una nueva Ley de Tierras que rige en todo el país. El Territorio.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ellis, R.E. 2014. China on the ground in latin America: challenges for the chinese and impacts on the region (The Political Economy of East Asia). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galak, O. 2011. Invierten 1000 millones de dólares para fabricar urea. la Nacion.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hogget, L. 2013. Uncertainty surrounds TDFEQ's proposed urea project in Tierra del Fuego. BN Americas.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ICBC. 2007. ICBC to Pay $5.6 Billion for Stake in Standard Bank. ICBC.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Infocampo. 2010. El gobernador de Río Negro ya está en China para atraer inversiones agrícolas. Infocampo.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Infocampo. 2016. China continúa bloqueando las importaciones argentinas de aceite de soja. Infocampo.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jie, G., and M. Myers. 2017. Chinese agricultural Investment in Latin America: less there than meets the eye? In The political economy of China–Latin America relations in the new millennium: brave new world, ed. M. Margaret and W. Carol, 92–114. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kwok, D., and D. Dolan. 2011. China's ICBC to take over Standard Bank Argentina. Reuters.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    La Nacion. 2008. Empresas, planta de methanol. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    La Nacion. 2010. Empresas, avanzada China en el sur. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    La Nacion. 2017. La base china en la Patagonia. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Laufer, R. 2011. Argentina–China: New courses for an old dependency. Latin American Policy 4 (1): 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longoni, M. 2011. En medio de la polemica, los chinos ya trabajan en Rio Negro. Clarin.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    López, A., and D. Ramos. 2014. Argentina y China: nuevos encadenamientos mercantiles globales con empresas chinas. Los casos de Huawei, CNOOC y Sinopec. In La inversión extranjera directa de China en América Latina: 10 estudios de caso, ed. E.D. Peters, 13–59. Mexico: Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lu, J., X. Liu, M. Wright, and I. Filatotchev. 2014. International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: the moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies 45 (4): 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luo, Y., Q. Xue, and B. Han. 2010. How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: experience from China. Journal of World Business 45 (1): 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 1995. Acuerdo por canje de notas entre el Gobierno de la República Argentina y el Gobierno de la República Popular China para el Establecimiento de una Consulado General en Shanghai. Beijing.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2000. Negociaciones entre el Gobierno de la República Argentina y el Gobierno de la República Popular China para el ingreso de la República Popular China a la Organización Mundial de Comercio. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2004. Memorandum de Entendimiento sobre Inversiones entre el Ministerio de Economía y Producción de la República Argentina y el Ministerio de Comercio de la República Popular China. Beijing.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2004. Memorándum de Entendimiento entre la República Argentina y la República Popular China sobre Cooperación en Materia de Comercio e Inversiones. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2010. Memorándum de Entendimiento entre el Gobierno de la República Argentina y el Gobierno de la República Popular China para Expandir y Diversificar su Relación en Materia de Comercio e Inversiones. Beijing.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2010. Declaración Conjunta entre la República Argentina y la República Popular China. Beijing.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2014. Declaración Conjunta sobre el Establecimiento de la Asociación Estratégica Integral entre la República Argentina y la República Popular China. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto. 2015. Declaración Conjunta sobre el Fortalecimiento de la Asociación Estratégica Integral entre la República Argentina y la República Popular China. Beijing.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Obarrio, M. 2014. Cristina y Xi Jinping acordaron inversiones por US$ 7500 millones. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Obarrio, M. 2015. Cristina firmó 15 convenios con China y ofreció invertir en recursos naturales. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Olivera, F. 2017. El Gobierno quiere que China financie dos nuevas centrales nucleares. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Orihuela, R. 2011. Chinese agro giant to invest $1.5b in Argentina. China Daily.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oviedo, E.D. 2010. Historia de las relaciones internacionales entre Argentina y China 1945-2010. Buenos Aires: Dunken.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oviedo, E.D. 2012. Argentina y China: causas de la disputa en torno al aceite de soja. Estudios de Asia y África: 337–376.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oviedo, E.D. 2013. Argentina facing China: modernization, interests and economic relations model. East Asia 30 (1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oviedo, E.D. 2015. Argentina and China: an analysis of the actors in the soybean trade and the migratory flow. Journal of Chinese Political Science 20 (3): 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ramasamy, B., M. Yeung, and S. Laforet. 2012. China’s outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership. Journal of World Business 47: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Roman, V. 2015. Un proyecto polémico, La estación espacial china empezará a funcionar en 2016. La Nacion.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Romig, S. 2011. Hungry China Shops in Argentina. Wall Street journal.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sauvant, K.P., and C.V. Zitian. 2014. China’s regulatory framework for outward foreign direct investment. China Economic Journal 7 (1): 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sina. 2011. 北大荒15亿美元阿根廷 种地. Sina.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Standard Bank. 2011. ICBC to acquire controlling shareholding in Standard Bank Argentina. Standard Bank.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tierra del Fuego Government. 2016. Decree 1426/16. The government terminate the Chinese agreement. Ushuaia, Argentina.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Urdinez, F., J. Knoerich, and P. Feliú Ribeiro. 2016. Don’t cry for me “Argenchina”: unraveling political views of China through legislative debates in Argentina. USP and King’s College London Working Paper.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wang, H. 2012. Ten Chinese going global models: emerging patterns and analysis. The European Journal of Finance 20 (7-9): 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xia, J., X. Ma, J.W. Lu, and D.W. Yiu. 2014. Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: a resource dependence logic. Strategic Management Journal 35: 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang, J., J. Jiang, and C. Zhou. 2014. Diplomacy and investment–the case of China. International Journal of Emerging Markets 9 (2): 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ziggers, D. 2011. China invests in Argentinean farmland.). All about feed.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    胡军华. 2011. 北大荒将赴阿根廷种地业内称难解中国大豆危局. 第一财经日报.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Advanced International and Area StudiesEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Mr. & Mrs. S.H. Wong Center for the Study of Multinational CorporationsLos GatosUSA

Personalised recommendations