China’s fiscal decentralization has the dual characteristics of revenue decentralization and expenditure decentralization, and their impacts on green total factor productivity are also different. By calculating the Malmquist-Luenburger index and using the Spatial Durbin Model, this study examines the effects of dual decentralization on green total factor productivity (GTFP) from the perspective of fiscal competition. It was found that revenue decentralization significantly hindered the improvement of a local area’s GTFP, and that the impact of fiscal revenue competition on a local area’s GTFP is also significantly negative. The expenditure decentralization and the fiscal expenditure competition among different areas are conducive to improving the local area’s GTFP. Moreover, the impact of revenue decentralization on efficiency improvement is significantly negative, while the expenditure decentralization is conducive to technical progress. All these findings may provide enlightenment for optimizing China’s fiscal decentralization and promoting high-quality economic development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Source: China Statistical Yearbook.
Source: Report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.
TFP mainly reflects the ratio of total output to real input of all production factors in the process of economic growth. Here, total output mainly refers to economic output (such as GDP), and input factors include labour and capital. However, GTFP includes the environmental benefits in the process of economic growth, and the total outputs include not only the economic output, but also the environmental output (the undesired output mentioned later, such as environmental pollution), the input factors include not only the labour and capital, but also the energy. Therefore, compared with TFP, GTFP comprehensively considers the dual constraints of economic growth and environmental quality, and the calculation results are more targeted, more accurate, and more practical.
Limited to space, we do not introduce the decomposition process of the direct effect and indirect effect in detail here. The specific content can refer to the Lesage and Pace (2009).
It should be noted that θ in Eq. (2) is used to represent fiscal competition, its economic meaning is consistent with the indirect effect here. But the indirect effect is the “net effect” after decomposition with the partial differential method. Therefore, we also report the results of θ and indirect effects.
In terms of the research method selection, compared with the SFA (Stochastic Frontier Analysis method), the DEA is based on the linear programming analysis method, which does not need to set the form of production function subjectively, and avoids the measurement error caused by subjectivity. Therefore, this study uses the DEA method to calculate the ML index considering undesired output, and to measure GTFP.
In later robustness test, we will measure the ML index based on the variable returns to scale again.
“The first law of geography” refers to the fact that any economic thing is related to the other things, and things closer in distance are always more intimate than the things in a far distance (Tobler 1970).
Anselin L, Gallo JL (2006) Interpolation of air quality measures in hedonic house price models: spatial aspects. Spat Econ Anal 1(1):31–52
Arbia G, Ghiringhelli C, Mira A (2019) Estimation of spatial econometric linear models with large datasets: how big can spatial big data be? Reg Sci Urban Econ 76:67–73
Banzhaf HS, Chupp BA (2012) Fiscal federalism and interjurisdictional externalities: new results and an application to US air pollution. J Public Econ 96:449–464
Bernauer T, Koubi V (2006) States as providers of public goods: how does government size affect environmental quality? SSRN
Bian YC, Song KY, Bai JH (2019) Market segmentation, resource misallocation and environmental pollution. J Clean Prod 228:376–387
Borck R, Caliendo M, Steiner V (2006) Fiscal competition and the composition of public spending: theory and evidence. IZA Working Paper, No. 2428
Cai JY, Zhang JH (2018) Fiscal decentralization and environmental governance: evidence from province-managing-county reforms. Econ Perspect 1:53–68
Cai F, Du Y, Wang MY (2008) The political economy of emission in China: will a low carbon growth be incentive compatible in next decade and beyond? Econ Res J 6:4–11
Chung YH, Fare R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-south trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109:755–787
Edmark K, Agren H (2008) Identifying strategic interactions in Swedish local income tax policies. J Urban Econ 63(3):849–857
Elhorst JP (2012) Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods and inferences. J Geogr Syst 14(1):5–28
Farhadi M (2015) Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transp Res A Policy Pract 74:73–90
Fredriksson PG, Wollscheid JR (2014) Environmental decentralization and political centralization. Ecol Econ 107:402–410
Halkos G, Paizanos E (2013) The effect of government expenditure on the environment: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 91:48–56
Huang SF (2017) Study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on smog pollution in China. J World Econ 2:127–152
Jin H, Qian Y, Weingast BR (2005) Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. J Public Econ 89(9–10):1719–1742
Jin G, Shen KY, Li J (2018) Interjurisdiction political competition and green total factor productivity in China: an inverted-U relationship. China Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.09.005
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2008) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. J Reg Sci 48(5):941–967
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman & Hall CRC Press, Boca Raton
Li K, Lin BQ (2017) Economic growth model, structural transformation, and green productivity in China. Appl Energy 187:489–500
Li B, Wu SS (2017) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153:342–353
Li B, Qi Y, Li Q (2016) Fiscal decentralization, FDI and green total factor productivity: an empirical test of dynamic GMM method based on panel data. J Int Trade 7:119–129
Lin BQ, Chen ZY (2018) Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in China? J Clean Prod 197:25–33
Lopez R, Galinato GI, Islam A (2011) Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2):180–198
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, New York
Oates WE, Portney RR (2003) The political economy of environmental policy. In: Maler KG, Vincent JR (eds) Handbook of environmental economics. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam
Ogawa H, Wildasin DE (2009) Think locally, act locally: spillovers, spillbacks, and efficient decentralized policy making. Am Econ Rev 99:1206–1217
Paas T, Schlitte F (2006) Regional income inequality and convergence processes in the EU-25. ERSA Conference Papers, No. ersa06p229
Pittman RW (1983) Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. Econ J 93:883–891
Sigman H (2014) Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution levels and variation. Land Econ 90(1):114–130
Song ML, Du JT, Tan KH (2018) Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity. Int J Prod Econ 205:359–367
Stewart R (1977) Pyramids of sacrifice? Problems of federalism in mandating state implementation of national environmental policy. Yale Law J 86:1196–1272
Stigler G (1957) The tenable range of functions of local government. In: federal expenditure policy for economic growth and stability. Joint Economic Committee, Subcommittee on Fiscal Politics, Washington DC, 213–219
Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(2):234–240
Uchimura H, Jütting JP (2009) Fiscal decentralization, Chinese style: good for health outcomes? World Dev 37(12):1926–1934
World Bank (1994) Annual report. Washington, World Bank
Wu HT, Li YW, Hao Y, Ren SY, Zhang PF (2019) Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: evidence from China. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135085
Yang ZA, Wang JY (2018) Study on fiscal decentralization system and green total factor productivity: inspection based on system GMM and the threshold effect. Ecol Econ 34(11):132–139
Yu YZ, Liu DY (2013) The effect of the space outflow of China’s regional innovation and the effect of the outflow of value chains: a study from the perspective of the innovative value chain, on the model of the panel of multidimensional space. Manag World 7:6–20
Yuyu C, Avraham E, Michael G, Hongbin L (2013) Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. PNAS 110(32):12936–12941
Zeng F (2012) Environmental pollution in China. Sci Technol Inf 33:142
Zhang K, Wang J, Cui X (2011) Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: from the perspective of carbon emission. China Ind Econ 10:65–75
Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energy Policy 103:203–211
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No.71573138]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No.71874084]; and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [Grant No. KYCX19_0709].
Conflict of interest
the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
About this article
Cite this article
Song, K., Bian, Y., Zhu, C. et al. Impacts of dual decentralization on green total factor productivity: evidence from China’s economic transition. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07953-8
- Dual decentralization
- Green total factor productivity
- Fiscal competition
- Spatial Durbin Model