Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Ecological development efficiency index of tropics and subtropics in China

  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

This paper proposes an ecological development efficiency index (EDEI) based on comprehensive metrics to measure the ecological efficiency and human development of the tropics and subtropics in China for the 2005–2016 period. In particular, the proposed index integrates the ecological footprint into the input metrics considering resource exploitation, carbon emission, and energy infrastructures. The traditional output factor, i.e., GDP, is substituted with the human development index to evaluate the local development quality on the basis of health, education, and income. It is observed that the EDEI of the tropics and subtropics in China grew slowly before stabilizing at approximately 0.92. Moreover, as shown in the Theil index analysis, the spatial heterogeneity of the EDEI in tropics and subtropics of China is increasing significantly. The EDEI of the eastern region of China is higher than that of the central region, and the EDEI of the western region is the lowest. Finally, based on the Tobit factor model, research density and urbanization are observed to be the keys to improving the EDEI for achieving sustainable growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Akita T (2003) Decomposing regional income inequality in China and Indonesia using two-stage nested Theil decomposition method. Ann Reg Sci 37:55–77

  2. Bai Y, Hua C, Jiao J, Yang M, Li F (2018) Green efficiency and environmental subsidy: evidence from thermal power firms in China. J Clean Prod 188:49–61

  3. Bian Y, Yang F (2010) Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energ Policy 38:1909–1917

  4. Borrell LN, Talih M (2011) A symmetrized Theil index measure of health disparities: an example using dental caries in U.S. children and adolescents. Stat Med 30:277–290

  5. Çelen A (2013) Efficiency and productivity (TFP) of the Turkish electricity distribution companies: an application of two-stage (DEA&Tobit) analysis. Energ Policy 63:300–310

  6. Cerutti AK, Beccaro GL, Bagliani M, Donno D, Bounous G (2013) Multifunctional ecological footprint analysis for assessing eco-efficiency: a case study of fruit production systems in northern Italy. J Clean Prod 40:108–117

  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

  8. Costanza R, Daly L, Fioramonti L, Giovannini E, Kubiszewski I, Mortensen LF, Pickett KE, Ragnarsdottir KV, De Vogli R, Wilkinson R (2016) Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecol Econ 130:350–355

  9. Deng C, Liu Z, Li R, Li K (2018) Sustainability evaluation based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: a case study in Hunan, China. Sustainability-Basel 10:4498

  10. Freeman AM, Haveman RH, Kneese AV (1972) Economics of environmental policy. Wiley, New York

  11. Guo S, Li H, Zhao R, Zhou X (2019) Industrial environmental efficiency assessment for China’s western regions by using a SBM-based DEA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:27542–27550

  12. He J, Wan Y, Feng L, Ai J, Wang Y (2016) An integrated data envelopment analysis and emergy-based ecological footprint methodology in evaluating sustainable development, a case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Ecol Indic 70:23–34

  13. He J, Wang S, Liu Y, Ma H, Liu Q (2017) Examining the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment using a coupling analysis: case study of Shanghai, China. Ecol Indic 77:185–193

  14. Hoang V, Nguyen TT (2013) Analysis of environmental efficiency variations: a nutrient balance approach. Ecol Econ 86:37–46

  15. Hu J, Kao C (2007) Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies. Energ Policy 35:373–382

  16. Hu J, Wang S (2006) Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energ Policy 34:3206–3217

  17. Hu W, Guo Y, Tian J, Chen L (2019) Eco-efficiency of centralized wastewater treatment plants in industrial parks: a slack-based data envelopment analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:176–186

  18. Huang J, Yang X, Cheng G, Wang S (2014) A comprehensive eco-efficiency model and dynamics of regional eco-efficiency in China. J Clean Prod 67:228–238

  19. Ji X, Chen B (2017) Assessing the energy-saving effect of urbanization in China based on stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology (STIRPAT) model. J Clean Prod 163:S306–S314

  20. Koch M, Buch-Hansen H, Fritz M (2017) Shifting priorities in degrowth research: an argument for the centrality of human needs. Ecol Econ 138:74–81

  21. Korhonen PJ, Luptacik M (2004) Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 154:437–446

  22. Lee Y, Hu J, Kao C (2011) Efficient saving targets of electricity and energy for regions in China. Int J Elec Power 33:1211–1219

  23. Li L, Hu J (2012) Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energ Policy 46:216–224

  24. Luo W, Bai H, Jing Q, Liu T, Xu H (2018) Urbanization-induced ecological degradation in Midwestern China: an analysis based on an improved ecological footprint model. Resour Conserv Recycl 137:113–125

  25. Ma B (2015) Does urbanization affect energy intensities across provinces in China?Long-run elasticities estimation using dynamic panels with heterogeneous slopes. Energy Econ 49:390–401

  26. Ma C, Zhao X (2015) China's electricity market restructuring and technology mandates: plant-level evidence for changing operational efficiency. Energy Econ 47:227–237

  27. Ma L, Long H, Chen K, Tu S, Zhang Y, Liao L (2019) Green growth efficiency of Chinese cities and its spatio-temporal pattern. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:441–451

  28. Masuda K (2016) Measuring eco-efficiency of wheat production in Japan: a combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 126:373–381

  29. Mickwitz P, Melanen M, Rosenström U, Seppälä J (2006) Regional eco-efficiency indicators – a participatory approach. J Clean Prod 14:1603–1611

  30. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (MEEPRC) (2016) Natural ecological environment in 2015. Available from <http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthj/201606/t20160602_353281.shtml> Accessed 03 Feb 2020

  31. Monastyrenko E (2017) Eco-efficiency outcomes of mergers and acquisitions in the European electricity industry. Energ Policy 107:258–277

  32. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2019) Statistical Communique of the People's Republic of China on the 2018 National Economic and Social Development. Available from <http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201902/t20190228_1651335.html> Accessed 03 Feb 2020

  33. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2017) Statistical Communique of the People's Republic of China on the 2017 National Economic and Social Development. Available from <http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201902/t20190228_1651335.html> Accessed 03 Feb 2020

  34. Passetti E, Tenucci A (2016) Eco-efficiency measurement and the influence of organisational factors: evidence from large Italian companies. J Clean Prod 122:228–239

  35. Pelenc J, Ballet J (2015) Strong sustainability, critical natural capital and the capability approach. Ecol Econ 112:36–44

  36. Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Beltrán-Esteve M, Gómez-Limón JA (2012) Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. Eur J Oper Res 220:798–809

  37. Rashidi K, Saen FR (2015) Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Econ 50:18–26

  38. Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4(2):121–130

  39. Reinhard S, Lovell CAK, Thijssen GJ (2000) Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables: estimated with SFA and DEA. Eur J Oper Res 121:287–303

  40. Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT Press, Cambridge

  41. Song M, Fisher R, Kwoh Y (2019a) Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technol Forecast Soc 144:361–368

  42. Song M, Zhu S, Wang J, Wang S (2019b) China's natural resources balance sheet from the perspective of government oversight: based on the analysis of governance and accounting attributes. J Environ Manag 248:109232

  43. Theil H (1967) Economics and information theory. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

  44. Ullah S, Li Z (2019) Hydro-electric power in the Panjkora basin at the expense of environmental deterioration and biodiversity loss—immediate action required for mitigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1008–1011

  45. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2010) Human development report 2010: the real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. Oxford University Press, New York

  46. Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

  47. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, Susana López Falfán I, Méndez Garcìa J, Isabel Suárez Guerrero A, Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero M (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375–390

  48. Wang S, Ma H, Zhao Y (2014) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment—a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Ecol Indic 45:171–183

  49. Wang W, Jiang D, Chen D, Chen Z, Zhou W, Zhu B (2016) A material flow analysis (MFA)-based potential analysis of eco-efficiency indicators of China's cement and cement-based materials industry. J Clean Prod 112:787–796

  50. Wang S, Zhao D, Chen H (2020) Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Energy Econ 85:104573

  51. Wilson B, Trieu LH, Bowen B (1994) Energy efficiency trends in Australia. Energ Policy 22:287–295

  52. Wu H, Du S, Liang L, Zhou Y (2013) A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits. Math Comput Model 58:1095–1101

  53. Xing Z, Wang J, Zhang J (2018) Total-factor ecological efficiency and productivity in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: a non-parametric distance function approach. J Clean Prod 200:844–857

  54. Yu Y, Chen D, Zhu B, Hu S (2013) Eco-efficiency trends in China, 1978–2010: decoupling environmental pressure from economic growth. Ecol Indic 24:177–184

  55. Yu Y, Huang J, Zhang N (2018) Industrial eco-efficiency, regional disparity, and spatial convergence of China’s regions. J Clean Prod 204:872–887

  56. Yue S, Yang Y, Pu Z (2017) Total-factor ecology efficiency of regions in China. Ecol Indic 73:284–292

  57. Yue S, Shen Y, Yuan J (2019) Sustainable total factor productivity growth for 55 states: an application of the new malmquist index considering ecological footprint and human development index. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:475–483

  58. Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z, Yuan Z, Ge J (2008) Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68:306–316

  59. Zhang X, Cheng X, Yuan J, Gao X (2011) Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energ Policy 39:644–650

  60. Zhang J, Zeng W, Shi H (2016) Regional environmental efficiency in China: analysis based on a regional slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs. Ecol Indic 71:218–228

  61. Zhou Y, Xing X, Fang K, Liang D, Xu C (2013) Environmental efficiency analysis of power industry in China based on an entropy SBM model. Energ Policy 57:68–75

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Editor, as well as the anonymous referees for valuable suggestions and comments that helped us improve our paper significantly.

Funding

This study was supported by the Social Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [grant number 17GLB008], Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [grant number 2242019S30044, 2242019 K40171], and Research Start-up Fund of Chuzhou University [grant number 2018qd10].

Author information

Correspondence to Shujing Yue.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, Y., Sun, S., Yue, S. et al. Ecological development efficiency index of tropics and subtropics in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07844-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • Ecological development efficiency index (EDEI)
  • Ecological footprint
  • Human development index (HDI)