Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 4206–4218 | Cite as

Impact of consumer–resource dynamics on C. elegans–E. coli system exposed to nano zero-valent iron (nZVI)

  • Ying-Fei Yang
  • Chi-Yun Chen
  • Tien-Hsuan Lu
  • Chung-Min LiaoEmail author
Research Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) is one of the most paramount nanoparticles (NPs) applied in environmental remediation, leading to great concerns for the potential impacts on soil ecosystem health. The objective of this study was to link toxicokinetics and consumer–resource dynamics in the Caenorhabditis elegansEscherichia coli (worm–bacteria) ecosystem. The biokinetic parameters of bacteria and worms were obtained from toxicokinetic experiments and related published literature. Biomass dynamics of bacteria and worms were estimated by employing the modified Lotka–Volterra model. Dynamics of bacteria and worm biomass, internal concentrations of nZVI, bioconcentration factors (BCFs), and biomagnification factors (BMFs) were simulated based on the consumer–resource dynamics. Results showed that the biomass of worms steadily increased from 22.25 to 291.49 g L−1, whereas the biomass of bacteria decreased from 17.17 to 4.70 × 10−8 g L−1 after 96-h exposures of nZVI. We also observed ratios of nZVI concentrations in worms and bacteria increased from 0.06 to 26.60 after 96 h. Moreover, decrements of the bioconcentration factor of E. coli (BCFE) values from 0.82 to 0.03 after 96 h were observed, whereas values of BMFs increased from 0.06 to 57.62 after 96 h. Internal concentrations of nZVI in worms were found to be mainly influenced by the ingestion rate of bacteria by worms, and the biomass conversion of bacteria had the lowest effect. Implementation of the integrated bioaccumulation–consumer–resource model supports the hypothesis that the C. elegansE. coli dynamics of internal nZVI concentrations could be effectively associated with the predator–prey behavior and was dominated by the same physiological parameter in the two biological systems.

Keywords

Nano zero-valent iron Toxicokinetics Consumer–resource dynamics Caenorhabditis elegans Escherichia coli Environmental dynamics 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 105-2313-B002-020-MY3).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Research involving human participants and animal rights

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Auffan M, Achouak W, Rose J, Roncato MA, Chanéac C, Waite DT, Masion A, Woicik JC, Wiesner MR, Bottero JY (2008) Relation between the redox state of iron-based nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity toward Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol 42(17):6730–6735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baalousha M, Yang Y, Vance ME, Colman BP, McNeal S, Xu J, Blaszczak J, Steele M, Bernhardt E, Hochella MF Jr (2016) Outdoor urban nanomaterials: the emergence of a new, integrated, and critical field of study. Sci Total Environ 557-558:740–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardos P, Bone B, Daly P, Elliott D, Jones S, Lowry G, Merly C (2014) A risk/benefit appraisal for the application of nano-scale zero valent iron (nZVI) for the remediation of contaminated sites. WP9 NanoRemGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes RJ, van der Gast CJ, Riba O, Lehtovirta LE, Prosser JI, Dobson PJ, Thompson IP (2010) The impact of zero-valent iron nanoparticles on a river water bacterial community. J Hazard Mater 184(1 − 3):73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berthouex PM, Brown LC (1994) Statistics for environmental engineers, Lewis Publishers. CRC press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhuvaneshwari M, Kumar D, Roy R, Chakraborty S, Parashar A, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2017) Toxicity, accumulation, and trophic transfer of chemically and biologically synthesized nano zero valent iron in a two species freshwater food chain. Aquat Toxicol 183:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters: an inttroduction to design, data analysis, and model building. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd WA, Cole RD, Anderson GL, Willians PL (2003) The effects of metals and food availability on the behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:3049–3055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brockmann D, Hufnagel L, Geisel T (2006) The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439(7075):462–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campfens J, Mackay D (1997) Fugacity-based model of PCB bioaccumulation in complex aquatic food webs. Environ Toxicol Chem 31(2):577–583Google Scholar
  11. Chaithawiwat K, Vangnai A, McEvoy JM, Pruess B, Krajangpan S, Khan E (2016) Impact of nanoscale zero valent iron on bacteria is growth phase dependent. Chemosphere 144:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen PJ, Tan SW, Wu WL (2012) Stabilization or oxidation of nanoscale zerovalent iron at environmentally relevant exposure changes bioavailability and toxicity in medaka fish. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):8431–8439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen PJ, Wu WL, Wu KC (2013) The zerovalent iron nanoparticle causes higher developmental toxicity than its oxidation products in early lifestages of medaka fish. Water Res 47(12):3899–3909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi JI, Yoon KH, Subbammal Kalichamy S, Yoon SS, Il Lee J (2016) A natural odor attraction between lactic acid bacteria and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. ISME J 10(3):558–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comfort SD, Shea PJ, Machacek TA, Gaber H, Oh BT (2001) Field-scale remediation of a metolachlor-contaminated spill site using zerovalent iron. J Environ Qual 30(5):1636–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Comfort SD, Shea PJ, Machacek TA, Satapanajaru T (2003) Pilot-scale treatment of RDX-contaminated soil with zerovalent iron. J Environ Qual 32(5):1717–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook SM (2009) Assessing the use and application of zero-valent iron nanoparticle technology for remediation at contaminated sites. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology InnovationGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowan MK, Bunn J (2016) Microbiology fundamentals: a clinical approach, 2nd edn. Hill, McGrawGoogle Scholar
  19. Djurišić AB, Leung YH, Ng AM, Xu XY, Lee PK, Degger N, Wu RS (2015) Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: mechanisms, characterization, and avoiding experimental artefacts. Small 11(1):26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El-Temsah YS, Joner EJ (2012) Ecotoxicological effects on earthworms of fresh and aged nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) in soil. Chemosphere 89(1):76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fajardo C, Ortiz LT, Rodriguez-Membibre ML, Nande M, Lobo MC, Martin M (2012) Assessing the impact of zero-valent iron (ZVi) nanotechnology on soil microbial structure and functionality: a molecular approach. Chemosphere 86(8):802–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferson S (1996) Automated quality assurance checks on model structure in ecological risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2(3):558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman MN, Peredney CL, Williams PL (2000) A soil bioassay using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. In: Henshel DS, Black MC, Harrass MC (eds) Environmental toxicology and risk assessment: standardization of biomarkers for endocrine disruption and environmental assessment. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 305–318Google Scholar
  24. Gavaskar A, Tatar L, Condit W (2005) Cost and performance report: nanoscale zero-valent iron technologies for source remediation. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port HuenemeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gil-Díaz MM, Pérez-Sanz A, Vicente MÁ, Lobo MC (2014) Immobilisation of Pb and Zn in soils using stabilised zero-valent iron nanoparticles: effects on soil properties. Clean 42(12):1–9Google Scholar
  26. Gobas FAPC (1993) A model for predicting the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic chemicals in aquatic food-webs: application to Lake Ontario. Ecol Model 69(1 − 2):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomes HI, Dias-Ferreira C, Ribeiro AB (2013) Overview of in situ and ex situ remediation technologies for PCB-contaminated soils and sediments and obstacles for full-scale application. Sci Total Environ 445–446:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray JM, Hill JJ, Bargmann CI (2005) A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(9):3184–3191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallatschek O, Fisher DS (2014) The acceleration of evolutionary spread by long-range dispersal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(46):E4911–E4919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. He F, Zhao D (2007) Manipulating the size and dispersibility of zerovalent iron nanoparticles by use of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilizers. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6216–6221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. He F, Zhao D, Paul C (2010) Field assessment of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles for in situ destruction of chlorinated solvents in source zones. Water Res 44(7):2360–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedgecock EM, Russell RL (1975) Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72(10):4061–4065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hochella MF Jr, Mogk DW, Ranville J, Allen IC, Luther GW, Marr LC, McGrail BP, Murayama M, Qafoku NP, Rosso KM, Sahai N, Schroeder PA, Vikesland P, Westerhoff P, Yang Y (2019) Natural, incidental, and engineered nanomaterials and their impacts on the Earth system. Science 363(6434)Google Scholar
  34. Hohberg K, Traunspurger W (2005) Predator–prey interaction in soil food web: functional response, size-dependent foraging efficiency, and the influence of soil texture. Biol Fertil Soils 41(6):419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holling CS (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Can Entomol 91(5):293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson LJ (1996) A simulation model of PCB dynamics in the Lake Ontario pelagic food web. Ecol Modell 93(1-3):43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones D, Candido EPM (1999) Feeding is inhibited by sublethal concentrations of toxicants and by heat stress in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: relationship to the cellular stress response. J Exp Zool 284(2):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kadar E, Rooks P, Lakey C, White DA (2012) The effect of engineered iron nanoparticles on growth and metabolic status of marine microalgae cultures. Sci Total Environ 439:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M (2009) Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks. Environ Health Perspect 117(12):1813–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keenan CR, Goth-Goldstein R, Lucas D, Sedlak DL (2009) Oxidative stress induced by zero-valent iron nanoparticles and Fe(II) in human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Sci Technol 43(12):4555–4560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keller AA, Garner K, Miller RJ, Lenihan HS (2012) Toxicity of nano-zero valent iron to freshwater and marine organisms. PLoS One 7(8):e43983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lassuy DR (1980) Effects of “farming” behavior by Eupomacentrus lividus and Hemiglyphidodon plagiometopon on algal community structure. Bull Mar Sci 30(1):304–312Google Scholar
  43. Lee C, Kim JY, Lee WI, Nelson KL, Yoon J, Sedlak DL (2008) Bactericidal effect of zero-valent iron nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol 42(13):4927–4933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee JH, Kim YG, Kim M, Kim E, Choi H, Kim Y, Lee J (2017) Indole-associated predator-prey interactions between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 19(5):1776–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lefevre E, Bossa N, Wiesner MR, Gunsch CK (2016) A review of the environmental implications of in situ remediation by nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI): behavior, transport and impacts on microbial communities. Sci Total Environ 565:889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li B, Qiu Y, Glidle A, Cooper J, Shi H, Yin H (2014) Single cell growth rate and morphological dynamics revealing an “opportunistic” persistence. Analyst 139(13):3305–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of physical biology. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  48. Ma X, Gurung A, Deng Y (2013) Phytotoxicity and uptake of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) by two plant species. Sci Total Environ 443:844–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Margerit A, Gomez E, Gilbin R (2016) Dynamic energy-based modeling of uranium and cadmium joint toxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 146:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milo R, Jorgensen P, Moran U, Weber G, Springer M (2010) BioNumbers--the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Database issue):D750–D753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mueller NC, Braun J, Bruns J, Černík M, Rissing P, Rickerby D, Nowack B (2012) Application of nanoscale zero valent iron (NZVI) for groundwater remediation in Europe. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 19(2):550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mulder C, Hendriks AJ (2014) Half-saturation constants in functional responses. Glob Ecol Conserv 2:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naja G, Halasz A, Thiboutot S, Ampleman G, Hawari J (2008) Degradation of hexahydro-1, 3, 5-trinitro-1, 3, 5-triazine (RDX) using zerovalent iron nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 42(12):4364–4370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Němeček J, Lhotský O, Cajthaml T (2014) Nanoscale zero-valent iron application for in situ reduction of hexavalent chromium and its effects on indigenous microorganism populations. Sci Total Environ 485–486:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Carroll D, Sleep B, Krol M, Boparai H, Kocur C (2013) Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation. Adv Water Resour 51:104–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pawlett M, Ritz K, Dorey RA, Rocks S, Ramsden J, Harris JA (2013) The impact of zero-valent iron nanoparticles upon soil microbial communities is context dependent. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peredney CL, Williams PL (2000) Utility of Caenorhabditis elegans for assessing heavy metal contamination in artificial soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39(1):113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodríguez-Palero MJ, Lopez-Diaz A, Marsac R, Gemoes JE, Olmedo M, Artal-Sanz M (2018) An automated method for the analysis of food intake behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep 8(1):3633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roh JY, Sim SJ, Yi J, Park K, Chung KH, Ryu DY, Choi J (2009) Ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using functional ecotoxicogenomics. Environ Sci Technol 43(10):3933–3940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saccà ML, Fajardo C, Costa G, Lobo C, Nande M, Martin M (2014) Integrating classical and molecular approaches to evaluate the impact of nanosized zero-valent iron (nZVI) on soil organisms. Chemosphere 104:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sarkar A, Sengupta S, Sen S (2019) Nanoparticles for soil remediation. In: Gothandam KM, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Lichtfouse E (eds) Nanoscience and biotechnology for environmental applications. Springer, Cham, pp 249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiemer F (1975) Nematoda. In: Curds CR, Hawkes HA (eds) Ecological aspects of used-water treatment. Academic, NY, pp 269–288Google Scholar
  63. Schulenburg H, Félix MA (2017) The natural biotic environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 206:55–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spann N, Goedkoop W, Traunspurger W (2015) Phenanthrene bioaccumulation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 49(3):1842–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spencer M, Ginzburg LR, Goldstein RA (1997) Community-level risk assessment, food chains and bioaccumulation. Environ Prog 19:90–97Google Scholar
  66. Subasinghe RP, Bondad-Reantaso MG, SE MG (2001) Aquaculture development, health and wealth. In: Subasinghe RP, Bueno P, Phillips MJ, Hough C, McGladdery SE, Arthur JR (eds) Aquaculture in the third millenium. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millenium, Bangkok, pp 20–25 February 2000 Available at: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/AB412E/ab412e09.htm Google Scholar
  67. Thomann RV, Connolly JP, Parkerton TF (1992) An equilibrium model of organic chemical accumulation in aquatic food webs with sediment interaction. Environ Toxicol Chem 11(5):615–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thutupalli S, Uppaluri S, Constable GW, Levin SA, Stone HA, Tarnita CE, Brangwynne CP (2017) Farming and public goods production in Caenorhabditis elegans populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(9):2289–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tilston EL, Collins CD, Mitchell GR, Princivalle J, Shaw LJ (2013) Nanoscale zerovalent iron alters soil bacterial community structure and inhibits chloroaromatic biodegradation potential in Aroclor 1242-contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 173:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Traunspurger W, Bergtold M, Goedkoop W (1997) The effect of nematodes on bacterial activity and abundance in a freshwater sediment. Oecologia 112(1):118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vinken M (2013) The adverse outcome pathway concept: a pragmatic tool in toxicology. Toxicology 312:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118:558–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Volterra JL (1931) Variations and fluctuations of a number of individuals in animal species living together. Translation. In: Chapman RN (ed). Animal ecology, McGraw Hill, pp 409–448Google Scholar
  74. Wang CB, Zhang WX (1997) Synthesizing nanoscale iron particles for rapid and complete dechlorination of TCE and PCBs. Environ Sci Technol 31(7):2154–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wu D, Cypser JR, Yashin AI, Johnson TE (2008) The U-shaped response of initial mortality in Caenorhabditis elegans to mild heat shock: does it explain recent trends in human mortality? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63(7):660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yang YF, Chen PJ, Liao VH (2016) Nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) at environmentally relevant concentrations induced multigenerational reproductive toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 150:615–623Google Scholar
  77. Yang YF, Lin YJ, Liao CM (2017) Toxicity-based toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic assessment for bioaccumulation and nanotoxicity of zero-valent iron nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Int J Nanomedicine 12:4607–4621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang R, Zhang N, Fang Z (2018) In situ remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by CMC-stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron composited with biochar. Water Sci Technol 77(6):1622–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioenvironmental Systems EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations